Skip to main content

Multiple Thinking and Creativity in School Leadership: A New Paradigm for Sustainable Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover School Leadership - International Perspectives

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 10))

Abstract

In a context of rapid globalization and huge transformation in the new century, life-long education, action learning, creativity, and multiple intelligence are often strongly emphasized in ongoing educational reforms and believed as the key elements for the sustainable development of the next generation. Yet, people are puzzled about how thinking, creativity, and intelligence are related to the process of school leadership such that the sustainability of school development and effectiveness can be enhanced in a complicated and fast-changing environment.

Taking leadership as an action learning process, this chapter aims to elaborate a framework for re-conceptualizing the multiple nature of thinking and creativity in school leadership for sustainable development. The profiles of multiple thinking in school leadership are mapped in terms of characteristics of technological thinking, economic thinking, social thinking, political thinking, cultural thinking, and learning thinking. The approaches to multiple creativity in school leadership are re-conceptualized in terms of cross-level thinking and cross-type thinking. With this framework, a new paradigm can be proposed to broaden the possibilities and approaches to facilitating multiple thinking and creativity in school leadership that can contribute to sustainable development and effectiveness at both individual and school levels in the new century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Hawamdeh, S., & Hart, T. L. (2002). Information and knowledge society. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1999). The development of intelligence. UK: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinants of organizational creativity: A literature review. Management Decision, 39 (10) (pp. 834–840).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning and action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R. & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L, G. & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, J. J. (Ed.) (2004). Dynamics of organizational change and learning. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshyk, Y. (Ed.) (2002). Action learning worldwide: Experience of leadership and organizational development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B., Cooper, C. & West, P. (2003). Organizational learning: The new management paradigm? Management Decision, 41 (5/6) (pp. 452–464).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A. (1999). Knowledge capitalism: Business, work and learning in the new economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti, C. (2002). Economic thinking, traditional ecological knowledge and ethnoeconomics. Current Sociology, 50 (1) (pp. 39–55).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2000). Cultural factors in educational effectiveness: A framework for comparative and cross-cultural research. School Leadership and Management, 20 (2) (pp. 207–225).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2003). School leadership and three waves of education reforms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (3) (pp. 417–439).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2005a). Sustainable school effectiveness and improvement: Multiple thinking and creativity. Invited keynote speech presented at The First International Conference on School Effectiveness and School Improvement in China organized by Shenyang Nornal University Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2005b). Multiple thinking and multiple creativity in organizational learning. Invited plenary speech presented at the International Conference on Learning Organization: Research and Development (ILCORD2005) with the theme “Learning Organization in a Learning World”, jointly organized by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and All India Association of Educational Research at KMUTT, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2005c). Multiple thinking and creativity in organizational learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 19 (7) (pp. 605–622).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. & Cheung, W. M. (2003). Profiles of multi-level self-management in schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 17 (3) (pp. 100–115).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. & Cheung, W. M. (2004). Four types of school environment: Multi-level self management & education quality. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10 (1) (pp. 71–100).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniss, C. & Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligence workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, K. (2000). Resolving conflicts as work: A complete guide for everyone on the job. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M. (2001). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, R. L. & Willis, V. J. (2003). Action learning: Images and pathways. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Manpower Bureau (1998). Information technology for learning in a new era: Five-year strategy 1998/99 to 2002/03. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission. (2000a). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission. (2000b). Review of education system: Reform proposals (Consultation document). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, G. (2001). Keynes on the “nature of economic thinking”: The principle of non-neutrality of choice and the principle of non-neutrality of money. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60 (4) (pp. 711–743).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. (1999). Business@ the speed of thought: Using a digital nervous system. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M., Morgan, H. & Ogg, A. J. (Eds.) (2004). Leading organizational leading: Harnessing the power of knowledge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. & Rees, G. (2002). Creating a learning society: Learning careers and policies for lifelong learning. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. & Huberman, M. (Eds.) (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 1–6). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. W. & Cunningham, L. (1994). Creating interactive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. In: D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman, (Eds.). Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 255–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. (1999). The transforming power of information technology. Community College Journal, 70 (2) (pp. 10–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J. & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istance, D. (2003). Schooling and lifelong learning: Insights from OECD analyses. European Journal of Education, 38 (1) (pp. 85–98).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (Ed.) (2001). The age of learning: Education and the knowledge society. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B. (2004). Individual and organizational learning: A model for reform for public organizations. Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, January (pp. 91–103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, G. R. & Goodpaster, J. R. (2002). Thinking (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1985). Power and influence. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Leonard, L. & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34 (2) (pp. 243–76).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. (1998). Site based management and organizational learning: conceptualizing their combined potential for meaningful reform, Planning and Change, 29 (1) (pp. 24–46).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1994a). Cost–benefit analysis. In: T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) 2 (pp. 1127–1131). Oxford, England/New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1994b). Cost-effectiveness analysis. In: T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) 2 (pp. 1131–1136). Oxford, England/New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the learning organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., Bitterman, J. & R. van der Veen (2000). From the learning organization to learning communities towards a learning society. Columbus, OI: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Information Series; No. 382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. F. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, I. & Brockbank, A. (2004). The action learning handbook: Powerful techniques for education, professional development and training. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregory, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, M. & Cheng, Y. C. (2001). A theory of self learning in a human and technological environment: Implications for education reforms. International Journal of Education Management, 15 (4) (pp. 172–186).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (1997). Literacy skills for the knowledge society: Further results from the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD, Human Resources Development Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD, Center for Educational Research and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (2000). The invisible continent: Four strategic imperatives of the new economy. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. D. (1998). The economic consequences of American education. Economics of Education Review, 17 (2) (pp. 229–230).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrowski, M. J. (2000). Creativity research: Implications for teaching, learning and thinking. Reference Services Review, 28 (4) (pp. 304–312).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M. & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34 (2) (pp. 161–79).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. & Stephenson, J. (2001) (Eds.). Competence in the learning society. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1998). Political leadership and educational failure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology (1st ed., 1965, 2nd ed., 1970). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1999). The corporate culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth dimension: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R. & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (5) (pp. 613–642).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solmon, L. C. & Fagnano, C. L. (1994). Benefits of education. In: T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) 1 (pp. 510–521). Oxford, England/New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (Ed.) (2000). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, T. (2002). Anticipatory action learning: Conversations about the future. Futures, 34 (5) (pp. 417–425).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydänmaanlakka, P. (2002). An intelligent organization: Integrating performance, competence and knowledge management. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villers, R. (1960). Dynamic management in industry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wain, K. (2004). The learning society in a postmodern world: The education crisis. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, P. J. & Castleberry, M.S. (Eds.) (2000). Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). The theory of social and economic organization. In: A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons (Eds. & Trans., 1947), New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. L. (1998). Economic socialization: The economic beliefs and behaviours of young people. Economics of Education Review, 17 (2) (pp. 231–232).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Burnham, J. & O’Sullivan, F. (1998). Leadership and professional development in schools: How to promote techniques for effective professional learning. London: Financial Times Pitman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhall, M. (1992). Cost–benefit analysis in educational planning (3rd ed.). UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, J. H. & Naples, M. (2000). Educational finance to support high learning standards: A synthesis. Economics of Education Review, 19 (4) (pp. 305–318).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, P. Y. & Cheng, Y. C. (2000). Leadership for teachers’ action learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 14 (5) (pp. 198–209).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the support from the Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (CERG) awarded by the Research Grants Council of University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong SAR Government to his research project (HKIEd8003/03H) that contributed partly to the development of this chapter. This chapter was developed from the model presented in my previous papers (Cheng, 2005a,b,c).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yin Cheong Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheng, Y.C. (2010). Multiple Thinking and Creativity in School Leadership: A New Paradigm for Sustainable Development. In: Huber, S. (eds) School Leadership - International Perspectives. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3501-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics