Skip to main content

The Experiences of White Women on Corporate Boards in Canada

Compliance and Non-Compliance To Hegemonic Masculinity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 14))

Abstract

Hegemony: a complex web of conceptual and material arrangements that produce the fabric of everyday life and which work through pervading common sense, consent and by becoming part of the ordinary way of seeing the world, understanding one’s self and experiencing needs (Alvesson and Deetz, 1996)

We would like to acknowledge the research assistance of Asaf Zohar and Rhona Berengut in the preparation of this manuscript, and the financial support for this research from the Schulich School of Business at York University, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (1996) Critical Theory and Postmodern Approaches to Organizational Studies, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage Publications, pp. 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. and Humphrey, R.H. (1993) Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity, Academy of Management Review Vol. 18 (1), pp. 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. and Piderit, S. (1994) Board Committee Membership: Effects of Sex-Based Bias, Academy of Management Journal 37, (6), pp. 1453–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. and Huse, R. (1997) The Qualitative Comparison of the Boardroom Experiences of U.S. and Norwegian Women Corporate Directors, International Review of Women and Leadership 3, (2), pp. 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P. (1996) Women as Constituent Directors: Rereading Current Texts Using a Feminist-Postmodemist Approach, in D. Boje, R. Gephart and T.J. Thatchenkery (eds.), Postmodern Management and Organization Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P. (1998) Power and Dynamic Tension and its Implications for Radical Organizational Change, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 7, (2), pp 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P. and Wicks, D. (1997) Women in the Academy: Cycles of Resistance and Compliance, in P. Prassad, A. Mills, M. Elmes and A. Prassad (eds.), Managing the Organizational Melting Pot: Dilemmas of Workplace Diversity, Sage Publications, pp. 199–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Z. and Tharenou, P. (1997) Characteristics of Women on Boards of Directors in Australia, International Review of Women and Leadership 3 (2), pp. 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (1994) Women on Corporate Boards: Forces for Change?, Women in Management Review 19 (1), pp. 191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (1997) Women Directors’ Activism on Corporate Boards of Directors: Thriving or Surviving?, International Review of Women and Leadership 3, (2), pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst Census (1999)Women Board Directors of Canada, 120 Wall Street, New York, 10005–3904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covelli, L. (1989) Dominant Class Culture and Legitimation: Female Volunteer Directors, in R. Herman and J. Van Til (eds.), Nonprofit Boards of Directors: Analyses and Applications, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgart, L. (1983) Women on Fortune 500 Boards, California Management Review 25 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. and J. Frey (1994) Interviewing: The Art of Science, in N.Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, J. (1992) Boardroom Renaissance: Power, Morality, and Performance in the Modern Corporation, Toronto: McGraw I Iill Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. and A. Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. (1981) Numbers and Positions of Women Elected to Corporate Boards, Academy of Management Journal 24 (3), pp. 619–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (1995) ’[he Social Organization of Boards of Directors, British Journal of Sociology,46 (2), pp. 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, D. and Talmud, 1. (1997) Getting Aboard: Mode of Recruitment and Gender Composition, The Case of Women Directors In Israel, International Review of Women and Leadership 3 (2), pp. 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, 1. (1998) Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure and Gender, Academy of Management Journal 31 (1), pp. 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, D. (1993) How Can Women Access Boards?, Women in Management. Nov/Dec, 4 ( 2 ). Published by the National Centre for Management Research’s Women in Management Program, Western School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J. (1939) Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and Meyerson, D. (1998), Women and Power: Conformity, Resistance and Disorganized Coaction, in R. Kramer, M.Neale (eds:j Power and Influence in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, M. (1993) Women Directors: Progress and Opportunities for the Future, Business and the Contemporary World, V (3), pp. 140–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (1997) Making Good Women Visible: The -Issues of Profile in New Zealand Corporate Directorships, International Review of Women in Leadership, 3 (2), pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. and Scully, M. (1995) Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change, Organization Science 6, pp 585–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J. (1989) Organization, Gender, and Culture, Organization Studies, 9, pp. 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (1984) A Profile of the Canadian Women Director, Western Business Quarterly, Spring, pp. 121–127. Morrison, A., White, R. and Van Velsor, E. (1987) Executive Women: Substance Plus Style, Psychology Today, August, pp. 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (1975) The Canadian Establishment, Toronto, Ontario: McCelland and Stewart Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2nd edition, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. and Whipp, R. (1991) Managing Change for Competitive Success, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1992) On Studying Managerial Elites, Strategic Management Journal 13, pp. 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S., Swanson, C. and Harrigan, K. (1981) Women on Corporate Boards. Working Paper, Centre for Research in Business and Social Policy, School of Management and Administration, The University of Texas at Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F. (1980) Invisible Resource: Women for Boards, Harvard Business Review, March-April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1986) Feminism and Law: Some Problems of Analysis and Strategy, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 14, pp. 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J. (1999) Collaboration in the Board Room: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties, Academy of Management Journal, 42, (1), pp. 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A. and Savage, M. (1992) The gender of organizations, in M. Savage and A. Witz (eds.) Gender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. and Westphal, J. (1996) Who Shall Succeed? How CEO Board Preferences and Power Affect the Choice of New CEOs, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1), p. 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradshaw, P., Wicks, D. (2000). The Experiences of White Women on Corporate Boards in Canada. In: Burke, R.J., Mattis, M.C. (eds) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5395-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3401-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics