Skip to main content

Infinite Regresses and Recurring Questions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infinite Regress Arguments

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 17))

  • 569 Accesses

Abstract

The infinite regress in some infinite regress arguments is presented or described in terms of recurring questions and answers. There are a few reasons why I want to examine the role of such recurring questions. First, they are sometimes used to capture the gist of an infinite regress argument. A case in point is Bradley's famous infinite regress argument against the reality of relations: Stout (1902) summarizes the argument's complex regress-generating component in the following way: “In its simple form the whole point of the argument is contained in the reiterated question - What connects the relation and its terms?”. (My italics.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a second edition (1984) of Rosenberg’s book, The Practice of Philosophy, a Handbook for Beginners, but I will refer only to the first edition because his arguments are more developed in that edition.

  2. 2.

    This analysis is confirmed by John Locke’s (1959: 326) discussion of the same regress, for he derives the same regress formula without making use of any recurring questions. “[T]o …make a man free […] by making the action of willing depend on his will, there must be another antecedent will, to determine the acts of this will, and another to determine that, and so on in infinitum: for wherever one stops, the actions of the last will cannot be free”.

    Of course, as pointed out by one of the reviewers, the volitionist theory would not entail the regress if it were formulated as: For any overt voluntary act, there is an internal voluntary act of will, and the overt voluntary act is caused by the internal voluntary act. For nothing in the first output would satisfy the sufficient condition in the universal formula.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Gratton .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gratton, C. (2009). Infinite Regresses and Recurring Questions. In: Infinite Regress Arguments. Argumentation Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3341-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics