Skip to main content

Abstract

One of the major hazards facing the livestock industries in food safety is commensal gut microorganisms (e.g. Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia enterocolotica, Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp.), which contaminate animal products and cause illness in humans. Traditionally, pathogenic gut microorganisms have been controlled by antibiotic growth promoters [8]. Use of such supplements in livestock is being phased out because of the emergence of antibiotic-resistant human-pathogens [4]. The use of growth promoters as feed supplements in livestock was banned by the European Union at the start of 2006 and similar bans are under review in Australia [16]. A number of approaches, such as vaccination, probiotics, chemical inhibitors and dietary manipulation are being considered for reducing these organisms in livestock. One possible control strategy is the use of natural antimicrobial plant compounds as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. These plants could then be incorporated into animal feeding systems provided there were no adverse affects on the animal and the products from those animals [6, 3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bryant, M.P., 1972. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25:1324–1328.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caldwell, D.R., and M.P. Bryant. 1966. Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. 14:780–794.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Callaway, T. R., R.O. Elder, J.E. Keen, R.C. Anderson, and D.J. Nisbet. 2003. Forage feeding to reduce preharvest Escheriscia coli populations in cattle, a review. J. Dairy Sci. 86:852–860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dibner, J.J. and J.D. Richards. 2005. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poult. Sci. 84:635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eloff, J.N. 1998. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta. Med. 64:711–713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hovde, C.J., P.R. Austin, K.A. Cloud, C.J. Williams, and C.W. Hunt. 1999. Effect of cattle diet on Escherichia coli O157:H7 acid resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3233–3235.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hungate, R.E. 1969. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes, pp. 117–132. In I.R. Norris, and E.W. Ribbons, (eds.), Methods in Microbiology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jenson, H.M. 2006. Health management with reduced antibiotic use – experience of a Danish pig vet. Anim. Biotech. 17:189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McSweeney, C.S., S.E. Denman, and R.I. Mackie. 2005. Rumen bacteria, pp. 23-37. In H.P.S. Makkar, and C.S. McSweeney (eds.), Methods in Gut Microbial Ecology for Ruminants. Springer, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Menke, K.H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz, and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. J. Agric. Sci. 93:217–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. M7-A4. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Wayne, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. M2-A6. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Wayne, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Österblad, M., T. Leistevuo, and P. Huovinen. 1995. Screening for antimicrobial resistance in fecal samples by the replica plating method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3146–3149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Recio, M.C., J.L. Rios, and A. Villar. 1989. A review of some antimicrobial compounds isolated from medicinal plants reported in the literature 1978-1988. Phytother. Res. 3:125–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rios, J.L., and M.C. Recio. 2005. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. J. Ethnopharma. 100:80–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wegener, H.C. 2003. Ending the use of antimicrobial growth promoters is making a difference. ASM. News 69:443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to Dr. B. Lowry and Mr. L. Conlan for useful discussions regarding plant extractions and to Drs. P. Jennings and G. Wijffels for support during the early stages of assay development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris S. McSweeney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 International Atomic Energy Agency

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemp, G.W., McSweeney, C.S. (2010). Screening of Plants for Inhibitory Activity Against Pathogenic Microorganisms from the Gut of Livestock. In: Vercoe, P., Makkar, H., Schlink, A. (eds) In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3297-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics