Skip to main content

Abstract

In the post-genomic age, the means to search the entire genome for biomarkers has become available, but the conventional approaches to biomarker discovery are entirely inadequate to yield results with the new technology. Finding clinically useful biomarker panels with sensitivity and specificity equal to that of cystoscopy is a problem of systems biology. Biomarkers are capable of bridging the distance between basic research and late-stage clinical trials and can even shorten it. Many pharmaceuticals and biotech companies are investing additional resources to bring biomarkers into the clinic. They hope that these efforts to practice pharmacogenomic research both in the preclinical and clinical stages will increase the odds of finding a successful drug. Most of the biomarker discovery utilize the microarrays for RNA analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aebersold, R., Goodlett, D.R., 2001, Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem Rev 101:269–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, N.L., Anderson, N.G., 1998, Proteome and proteomics: New technologies, new concepts and new words. Electrophoresis 19:1853–1861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, A.J., 2001, Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandara, L.R., Kelly, M.D., Lock, E.A., Kennedy, S., 2003, A potential biomarker of kidney damage identified by proteomics: preliminary findings. Biomarkers 8(3–4):272–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caprioli, R.M., Farmer, T.B., Gile, J., 1997, Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal Chem 69(23):4751–4760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaurand, P., Schwartz, S.A., Caprioli, R.M., 2004, Profiling and imaging proteins in tissue sections by MS. Anal Chem 76:86A–93A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui, H., Cruz-Correa, M., Giardiello, F.M., Hutcheon, D.F., Kafonek, D.R., Brandenburg, S., Wu, Y., He, X., Powe, N.R., Feinberg, A.P., 2003, Loss of IGF2 imprinting: a potential marker of colorectal cancer risk. Science 299(5613):1753–1755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhanasekaran, S.M., Barrette, T.R., Ghosh, D., Shah, R., Varambally, S., Kurachi, K., Pienta, K.J., Rubin, M.A., Chinnaiyan, A.M., 2001, Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 412(6849):822–826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamandis, E.P., 2004, Mass spectrometry as a diagnostic and a cancer biomarker discovery tool: opportunities and potential limitations. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:367–378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenn, J.B., Mann, M., Meng, C.K., Wong, S.F., Whitehouse, C.M., 1989, Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246:64–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferber, G., 2002, Biomarkers and proof of concept. Methods find. Exp Clin Pharmacol 24:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond, M.E., Taube, S.E., 2002, Issues and barriers to development of clinically useful tumor markers: a development pathway proposal. Semin Oncol 29:213–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanash, S., 2003, Harnessing immunity for cancer marker discovery. Nat Biotechnol 21:37–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurst, R.E., 2009, Does the biomarker search paradigm need re-booting? BMC Urol 9:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Issaq, H.J., Veenstra, T.D., Conrads, T.P., Felschow, D., 2002, The SELDI TOF MS approach to proteomics: protein profiling and biomarker identification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292(3):587–592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, S., 2002, The role of proteomics in toxicology: identification of biomarkers of toxicity by protein expression analysis. Biomarkers 7:269–290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MacGregor, J.T., 2003, The future of regulatory toxicology: impact of the biotechnology revolution toxicological. Sciences 75:236–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrow, D.A., Braunwald, E., 2003, Future of biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: moving toward a multimarker strategy. Circulation 108:250–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Negm, R.S., Verma, M., Srivastava, S., 2002, The promise of biomarkers in cancer screening and detection. Trends Mol Med 8:288–293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paweletz, C.P., Trock, B., Pennanen, M., Tsangaris, T., Magnant, C., Liotta, L.A., Petricoin, E.F., 2001, Proteomic patterns of nipple aspirate fluids obtained by SELDI-TOF: potential for new biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Dis Markers 17(4):301–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pepe, M.S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J.D., Thompson, M.L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., Yasui, Y., 2001, Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(14):1054–1061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepe, M.S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J.D., Thompson, M.L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., Yasui, Y., 2004, Early changes in protein expression detected by mass spectrometry predict tumor response to molecular therapeutics. Cancer Res 64(24):9093–9100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reyzer, M.L., Caldwell, R.L., Dugger, T.C., et al., 2004, Early changes in protein expression detected by mass spectrometry predict tumor response to molecular therapeutics. Cancer Res 64:9093–9100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin, B.K., Wang, H., Hanash, S., 2002, Proteomics approaches to uncover the repertoire of circulating biomarkers for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7:407–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sidransky, D., 2002, Emerging molecular markers of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:210–219; doi:10.1038/nrc755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Debnath, M., Prasad, G.B., Bisen, P.S. (2010). Biomarkers. In: Molecular Diagnostics: Promises and Possibilities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3261-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics