Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Emergence of the Local Management of Schools (LMS) in Israel: A Political Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Education Reforms

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 9))

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the emergence of the local management of schools (LMS) in Israel in the past decade. The theoretical framework that guides the present study based upon political behavior perspectives directs attention to the contextual forces that generate issues, stimulate pressures, and govern decision processes by shaping the opportunity structures in which actors deliberate and decide policy. It is also known from the political behavior perspectives that government seeks responses that stabilize and legitimize the system; both are necessary for the system to function. Grounded on that theory I argue that the decentralization reform in the Israeli educational system, through the emergence of the LMS was done because of political reasons, and not for pedagogical reasons as it was presented to the public.

The case study based on key persons’ interviews, published and unpublished documents, reveal that the Israeli Ministry of Education (representing the central government), which is held guilty for the performance failures of the educational system, sought to solve conflicts with various group interests (teachers unions, the business corporations, and parents’ associations) and to gain legitimacy in the public eyes, by decentralizing the educational system. By adopting this behavioral pattern the central government succeeded in reducing criticism, having the tacit consent of the teachers’ unions (who had been the main group to criticize the ineffectiveness of the educational system performance), and transfering the responsibility for the school performance to stakeholders, primarily school teachers and parents.

This chapter has been written during the stay of the author, as a visiting professor at the department of educational policy and leadership, in the college of education at the University of Maryland (USA). The author is grateful to the host department and to its chairperson, Dr. Thomas Weible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Duhou, I. (1993). School-based management. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aroshes, Sh. (1990). The autonomous school implementation. Unpublished MA thesis. Jerusalem (in Hebrew): The Hebrew University, school of education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, M., Word, B. (1986). Public policy in Britain. Basil Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilov, J. (1986). The pedagogical independence of the school. In: Major education themes in the Israeli education system. Jerusalem (in Hebrew): Ministry of Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinur, B. Z. (1958). Values and ways. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Urim Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Th. (1976). Policy analysis. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965). A system analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, C.B., & Cobb, R.W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, I., Brama, R., & Torn, N. (1998). SBM: changes in the managerial culture at Israeli primary schools. Jerusalem (in Hebrew): Sold Institute for Behavioral Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamage, D.T. (1996). SBM: theory research and practice. Colombo: Karunratme & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamage, D. T. (2006). Professional development for leaders and managers of self-governing schools. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, H. (1996). Politics and policy making in Israel education. Sussex: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, M.B., Cooper, S., Raghu, R., & Zegarra, H. (1991). Educational reform: Social struggle, the state and the world economic system. In: M.B. Ginsburg (Ed.), Understanding educational reform in global context (pp. 3-47). New York, Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1996). This is our way: autonomy and self management of schools. In: O. Brendes (Ed.), Hakfitsa Hashlishit (The third jumping) (pp. 249-260) (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Ministry of Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habinski, A. (1997). Self managing school. Jerusalem: Zippory Center for Community Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadasahot (Daily newspaper) (1992). Ms Aloni transfers new powers to schools. 18 Sept 1992 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviv, R. (2003). SBM perceived effectiveness by teachers and principals: a comparative study. Unpublished MA thesis. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, D. (1990). Is it possible to have autonomy within a centralized school system? In I. Friedman (Ed.), Autonomy in education. Jerusalem: Sold Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iram, J., & Schmida, M. (1998). The educational system in Israel. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Knesset Proceedings (1981/82). Conclusions of the Knesset committee for the examination of the structure of primary schooling and the educational reform, 354-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Knesset Proceedings (1985/86). Minister of Education presentation in front of Knesset members about his office operations, 2717-2769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Ministry of Education and Culture (1949). The compulsory law. Jerusalem: MEN Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Ministry of Education and Culture (1993). Recommendations of the steering committee for self managing schools. Jerusalem: MEN Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levacic, R. (1995). School governing bodies: management boards or supporters of clubs. Public Money and Management, 15, 35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Haim, E. (2005). The effect of SBM upon school principals’ job satisfaction and burnout. Unpublished MA thesis. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, N. (1993). Dr. Nimrod Aloni leading the struggle against the privatization in education (by the back door). Haharetz, 22 Nov 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Beck, L.G. (1995). School-based management and school reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A. (2002). The impact of SBM on school health. Journal of Leadership, 12, 368-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A. (2003a). The impact of SBM on supervision instructors professional consideration. International Journal of Educational Management, 17, 49-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A. (2003b). The impact of SBM on public schools in Israel. Curri Teach, 18, 65-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormian, Ch. (1973). Education in Israel. Jerusalem (in Hebrew): Ministry of Education and Culture Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, M. (1993). The Ministry of Education and Culture self managing school policy: recommendations for a legitimate privatization. Haharetz, 23 Nov 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (1984). The politics of bureaucracy. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • PISA (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: first results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volanski, A. (1992). A proposal for the educational system structure reorganization. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volanski, A. (2003). From an educational experiment to a policy: The transfer of the Israeli primary school to the LMS pattern. In A. Volansky, & I. Friedman (Eds.), Self managing schools: an international perspective. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. N. (1989). Education and power: the politics of educational decentralization in comparative perspective. Educational Policy, 3, 31-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H.N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: an exercise in contradictions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 443-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H.N. (1993). Control versus legitimation. In J. Hannaway, & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 55-83). San-Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholstetter, P., & Odden, A. (1992). Rethinking school-based management policy and research. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting. New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2006). Decentralisation and privatisation in education: the role of the state. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J., & Gamage, D.T. (Eds.) (2009). Decentralisation, school-based management, and quality. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanbar, M. (1976). Final report of the steering committee on local authorities. Jerusalem: Ministry of Interior Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bar Ilan University School of Education, Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel

    Haim H. Gaziel

Authors
  1. Haim H. Gaziel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haim H. Gaziel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Catholic University, Victoria Parade 115, Fitzroy, 3065, Australia

    Joseph Zajda

  2. David O. McKay School of Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, 84602, U.S.A.

    Macleans A. Geo-JaJa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaziel, H.H. (2010). The Emergence of the Local Management of Schools (LMS) in Israel: A Political Perspective. In: Zajda, J., Geo-JaJa, M. (eds) The Politics of Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3218-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation