Abstract
This chapter provides an analysis of the policies and laws that have emerged in southern Africa to regulate the harvesting, trade, and commercial development of Hoodia. Many of these policies have evolved rapidly, alongside the commercialisation of Hoodia and the increasing prominence of access and benefit sharing as a policy issue. However, policy implementation has been challenging, complicated by the fact that both the traditional knowledge that was used to develop Hoodia and the species involved cross national borders and involve a number of distinct indigenous communities. Each of the three countries with which Hoodia and its knowledge are associated has evolved a distinct regulatory approach towards the plant's conservation and use, and to the way in which ABS issues are framed. Moreover, southern African countries are at very different points of legislating for ABS, hold inconsistent understandings of the role of traditional knowledge holders, and also have varied approaches and capacities for bioprospecting and natural product development. While these more slippery political issues of benefit sharing and indigenous peoples remain disconnected and incoherent between southern African countries, those countries have increasingly collaborated to design joint policies for Hoodia management, with steps put in place to collaborate more strongly on poaching, trade and the transport of illegally harvested material. This bodes well for future cooperation and suggests a positive environment within which policy resolutions can be found.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CBD (2009). Report of the Seventh Meeting of the Ad-Hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Paris, 2–8 April. www.cbd. int/doc/?meeting=abswg-07. Accessed 26 May 2009.
CITES (2004). Amendments to Appendices I and II of CITES. Proposal to the thirteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, Bangkok, Thailand, 2–14 October. www.cites.org/common/ cop/13/raw_props/BW-NA-ZA- Hoodia.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2006.
Crouch, N. R., Douwes, E., Wolfson, M. M., Smith, G. F., & Edwards, T. J. (2008). South Africa's bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing legislation: current realities, future complications, and a proposed alternative. South African Journal of Science, 104, 355–366.
Federal Trade Commission (2007). FTC Charges Marketers of ‘Hoodia’ Weight Loss Supplements with Deceptive Advertising, 27 April 2009. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/04/nutraceuticals. shtm. Accessed 31 May 2009.
IFPMA. (2006). Guidelines for IFPMA members on access to genetic resources and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of their utilization. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, 7 April. Geneva: Switzerland.
INA (2004). Expert Workshop Promoting CITES-CBD Cooperation and Synergy. International Academy for Nature Conservation, Isle of Vilm, Germany, 20–24 April. www.cbd.int/cooperation/ final-report-CITES CBD_Vilm_Workshop_Report.doc.
Marloth, R. (1932). The flora of South Africa, vol 3. Cape Town/London: Darter Bros/Wheldon & Wesley.
Mupetami, L. (2007). Resource management and protection, Presentation to a conference on Hoodia, 22–23 February. Keetmanshoop, Namibia.
Nott, K., & Wynberg, R. (2008). Millenium challenge account Namibia compact, Volume 4: Thematic Analysis Report – Indigenous Natural Products, Namibia Strategic Environmental Assessment. Task order under the Project Development, Project Management, Environmental and General Engineering ID/IQ Contract no. MCC-06-0087-CON-90, Task Order No. 02.
Rosenberg, D. (7 November 2006). Some business perspectives on the international regime. UK: GlaxoSmithKline.
Ruiz Miller, M., & Lapeña, I. (Eds.) (2007). A moving target: genetic resources and options for tracking and monitoring their international flows. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 67/3, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Taylor, M., & Wynberg, R. (2008). Regulating access to South Africa's biodiversity and ensuring the fair sharing of benefits from its use. South African Journal of Environmental Science and Policy, 15(2), 217–243.
UEBT (2007). BioTrade Verification Framework for Native Natural Ingredients – 2007–09–20. Union for Ethical BioTrade, Geneva. www.uebt.ch/dl/Engl-UEBT-Nat-Ingredients-Ver-framework-2007-09-20(rev1)b.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2009.
UN (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Adopted by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September. www.un.org/esa/socdev/ unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2008.
UNI–IAS (2008). Access to genetic resources in Africa: analysing ABS policy development in four African countries. Development Cooperation Ireland, United Nations Environment Programme, United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.
Wynberg, R., & Newton, D. (2008). A Policy and Trade Assessment for Hoodia spp. in Namibia, Botswana and South Africa. Unpublished report, Environmental Evaluation Unit, University of Cape Town and TRAFFIC.
Wynberg, R., & Taylor, M. (2009). Finding a path through the ABS maze: challenges of regulating access and ensuring fair benefit-sharing in South Africa. In E. C. Kamau & G. Winter (Eds.), Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law: solutions for access and benefit sharing. London: Earthscan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
We lost our culture, because the colonial governments came in and took over everything, now the younger generation don’t know our forefathers’ culture and traditions. It’s only a few of us elders who know about it. I am telling you I feel really sad, I just want to cry because we have lost our whole life. (Rosa #Gaeses, Etosha Poort, Outjo, Namibia)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wynberg, R. (2009). Policies for Sharing Benefits from Hoodia . In: Wynberg, R., Schroeder, D., Chennells, R. (eds) Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3122-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3123-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)