Skip to main content

Estimating Drag Forces on Suspended and Laid-on-Seafloor Pipelines Caused by Clay-Rich Submarine Debris Flow Impact

  • Chapter
Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 28))

Abstract

Estimating the impact drag forces exerted by a submarine debris flow on a pipeline is a challenge. The conventional geotechnical based methods available to estimate drag forces on buried pipelines in unstable slopes are not applicable to a debris flow impact situation as they ignore or significantly underestimate the shear rate effects in the soil-structure interaction. The results of recent investigations indicate that a fluid dynamics approach in conjunction with rheological principles of non-Newtonian fluids provides a more appropriate way in the study of soil-pipe interaction for submarine debris flow impact situations. To that extent, this paper summarizes the results of a recent investigation on the impact of clay-rich submarine debris flows on suspended (free-span) and laid-on-seafloor pipelines. It presents a method to estimate the drag forces, longitudinal and normal to the pipe axis, for various angles of impact. The investigation comprised experimental flume tests and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ASTM (D2196-05) Standard Test Methods for Rheological Properties of Non-Newtonian Materials by Rotational (Brookfield type) Viscometer. In Materials AS fT (ed) D2196 –05: ASTM Int

    Google Scholar 

  • CFX (2007) CFX Solver Theory, CFX-Program (Version 11.0) Theory Documentation. Canonsburg, USA: ANSYS Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JM, Prior DB (1978) Submarine Landslides in the Mississippi River Delta 2: 1067 – 1074. Proc 10th Ann Offshore Tech Conf Houston, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe CT, Elger DF, Roberson JA (2001) Engineering fluid mechanics. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferziger JH, Perié M (2002) Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Berlin: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2004) Fluid mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Locat J (1997) Normalized Rheological Behaviour of Fine Muds and Their Flow Properties in a Pseudoplastic Regime. In Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Predication and Assessment, Water Resources Engineering Division (pp. 260 –269): Am Soc Civil Eng (ASCE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T, Alexander J (2001) The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits. Sedimentology 48: 269 –299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapery RA, Dunlap WA (1978) Prediction of Storm Induced Sea Bottom Movement and Platform Forces. Proc 10th Ann Offshore Tech Conf, Houston, Texas, p. 1789 –1796

    Google Scholar 

  • White FM (2006) Viscous fluid flow. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlow R (2001) Basic soil mechanics (3rd ed.). Harlow, England: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A (2009a) Review of the State-of-the-Art: Drag Forces on Submarine Pipelines and Piles Caused by Landslide or Debris Flow Impact. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng, Am Soc Mech Eng 131: DOI: 10.1115/1111.2957922

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A (2009b) Submarine Debris Flow Impact on Suspended (Free-Span) Pipelines: Normal and Longitudinal Drag Forces. Ocean Eng 36: 489 –499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A, Høeg K, Nadim F (2008) Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part I: Experimental investigation. Coast Eng 55: 1209 –1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A, Hoeg K, Nadim F (2009a) Submarine Debris Flow Impact on Pipelines: Numerical Modeling of Drag Forces for Mitigation and Control Measures. SPE Projects, Facilities and Construction, 4(1): 1 –11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A, Høeg K, Nadim F (2009b) Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part II: Numerical analysis. Coast Eng 56: 1 –10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements The work presented here (ICG Contribution No. 258) was supported by the Research Council of Norway through the International Centre for Geohazards (ICG) and the Leif-Eiriksson stipend awarded to the author. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. Further, the author is thankful to Prof. David White and Prof. Christopher Baxter for their review efforts and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A — Theory for CFD Numerical Analysis

Appendix A — Theory for CFD Numerical Analysis

A general description of the theory and the constitutive equations used in the CFD analyses are briefly presented here. In the formulation, the different phases are denoted by lowercase Greek letters, α and β, and the total number of phases is NP. In the inhomogeneous model, each phase has its own velocity and other relevant flow fields while the pressure field is shared between the incompressible fluid phases (CFX 2007). In this model, the fluids interact via the inter-phase mass and momentum transfer terms. The phase continuity equation is expressed by:

$$\frac{\partial}{{\partial t}}\left({r_\alpha \rho _\alpha} \right) + \nabla \bullet \left({r_\alpha \rho _\alpha U_\alpha} \right) = {\rm{S}}_{MS_\alpha} + \sum\limits_{\beta = 1}^{N_P} {\Gamma _{\alpha \beta}} $$
((A.1))

where, rα, ρα, and Uα are the phase volume fraction, density and velocity, respectively, and SMSα is the user specified mass sources. Γαβ is the mass flow rate per unit volume from phase β to phase α, which must obey the rule: \(\Gamma _{\beta \alpha} = - \Gamma _{\beta \alpha} \Rightarrow \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^{N_P} {\Gamma _\alpha = 0.} \)

It is important to define the direction of the mass transfer in the conservative equations. A convenient method is to express Γαβ by: \(\Gamma _{\alpha \beta} = \Gamma _{\alpha \beta}^ + - \Gamma _{\beta \alpha}^ + \). The term Γαβ > 0 represents a positive mass flow rate per unit volume from phase β into phase α. The volume fraction is bound by: \(\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^{N_P} {r_\alpha = 1} \). The momentum equation for a continuous fluid phase is:

$$\begin{array}{l} {\frac{\partial}{{\partial t}}\left({r_\alpha \rho _\alpha U_\alpha} \right) + \nabla \bullet \left({r_\alpha \left({\rho _\alpha U_\alpha \otimes U_\alpha} \right)} \right)} \\ {= - r_\alpha \nabla P_\alpha + \nabla \bullet \left({r_\alpha \mu _\alpha \left({\nabla U_\alpha + \left({\nabla U_\alpha} \right)^T} \right)} \right)} \\ {+ \sum\limits_{\beta = 1}^{N_P} {\left({\Gamma _{\alpha \beta}^ + U_\beta - \Gamma _{\beta \alpha}^ + U_\alpha} \right) + S_{M\alpha} + M_\alpha}} \\ \end{array}$$
((A.2))

where, Pα and μα are the pressure and viscosity, respectively, and S is the user defined momentum sources due to external body forces. T is the matrix transpose operation. Mα is the sum of interfacial forces acting on phase α due to the presence of other phases and is obtained from:

$$M_\alpha = \sum\limits_{\beta \ne \alpha} {M_{\alpha \beta} = M_{\alpha \beta}^D + M_{\alpha \beta}^{LUB} + M_{\alpha \beta}^{VM}} + M_{\alpha \beta}^{TD} + \ldots $$
((A.3))

where, the terms indicated above, in order, represent the inter-phase drag force, lift force, wall lubrication force, virtual mass force and turbulence dispersion force. Finally, the term (\(\Gamma _{\alpha \beta}^ + U_\beta - \Gamma _{\beta \alpha}^ + U_\alpha \)) represents the momentum transfer induced by the inter-phase mass transfer. The governing transport equations result in 4 × NP + 1 equations with 5 × NP unknowns that correspond to (u, v, w, r, P)α for α = 1 to NP, where u, v, and w and the velocity components in the x, y and z directions, respectively. Given that the fluids in the inhomogeneous multiphase flow share the same pressure field, the transport equations are solved by imposing the constraint of Pα = P for all α = 1 to Np

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zakeri, A. (2010). Estimating Drag Forces on Suspended and Laid-on-Seafloor Pipelines Caused by Clay-Rich Submarine Debris Flow Impact. In: Mosher, D.C., et al. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3071-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics