Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Landscape Structure Reveal Ecological Sustainability?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Modelling

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 8))

  • 1154 Accesses

Abstract

In the last decades, sustainable development has been acknowledged to be of major importance in the European Union for the future, leading to numerous Commission Strategies and Action Plans (amongst others CEC, 2001, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2007). Sustainability Impact Assessment is one option to convert policies into operational approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, T. (2006). The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(3–4), 198–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger M. J., Jongman R. H. G., Brandt J., De Blust G., Elena-Rossello R., et al. (2008). A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape Ecology, 23(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2001). A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. (Commission proposal to the Gothenburg European Council), COM(2001) 264, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2004). Stimulating Technologies for Sustainable Development: An Environmental Technologies Action Plan for the European Union, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2004) 38, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2005b). The 2005 Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy: Initial Stocktaking and Future Orientations, COM(2005) 37, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2005a). Review of the Sustainable Development Strategy – A platform for action, COM(2005) 658, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2005c). Thematic Strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources, COM(2005) 670 final, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2005d). Impact assessment guidelines, SEC(2005) 791, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2007). Progress Report on the Sustainable Development Strategy 2007, COM(2007) 642 final, EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLC (2000). Corine Land Cover, http://terrestrial.eionet.europa.eu/CLC2000

  • Cumming, S., & Vernier, P. (2002). Statistical models of landscape pattern metrics, with application to regional scale dynamic forest simulations. Landscape Ecology, 17(5), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2005). Agriculture and environment, in EU-15 – the IRENA indicator report, EEA Report 6, 2005, EC, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernoult, A., Freire-Diaz, S., Langlois, E., & Alard, D. (2006). Are similar landscapes the result of similar histories? Landscape Ecology, 21(5), 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estreguil, C., et al. (2001). Relevance of corine land cover for reporting on nature protection at regional level. Ispra, Italy: DG-JRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics – The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graymore, L. M. M., Sipe, N. G., & Rickson, R. E. (2008). Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? Ecological Economics, 67(3), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young, R., & Chopping, M. (1996). Quantifying landscape structure: A review of landscape indices and their application in forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography, 20(4), 418–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helming K., Pérez-Soba M., & Tabbush P. (Eds.). (2008). Sustainability impact assessment of land use change. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC (Joint Research Centre, EC) Image 2000 & Corine Land Cover 2000 Project, http://image2000.jrc.it (22.10.2008)

  • Jongman, R. H. G. (2002). Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: Ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2–4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, J., Estreguil, C., & Ostapowicz, K. (2008). European Forest cover mapping with high resolution satellite data: The Carpathians case study. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 10(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, S., & Tiede, D. (2003). vLATE Extension für ArcGIS – vektorbasiertes Tool zur quantitativen Landschaftsstrukturanalyse, ESRI Anwenderkonferenz 2003 Innsbruck. CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., Ellis, C. D., Kweon, B. S., & Hong, S. K. (2008). Relationship between landscape structure and neighbourhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment, Island Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, D., Zechmeister, H., Plutzar, C., Sauberer, N., Wrbka, T., & Grabherr, G. (2002). Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 17(7), 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P., & Turner, M. G. (1989). Georgia landscape: A changing resource. In I. S. Zonneveld & R. T. T. Forman (Eds.), Changing landscapes: An ecological perspective (pp. 137–146). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterseil, J., Wrbka, T., Plutzar, C., Schmitzberger, I., Kiss, A., Szerencsits, E., et al. (2004). Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes: The SINUS approach. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, J., Rodà, F., Ribas, J., & Pons, X. (2000). Landscape structure and bird species richness: Implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1–2), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renetzeder, C., Van Eupen M., Mücher C.A., & Wrbka T. (2008). A spatial regional reference framework for sustainability assessment. In K. Helming et al. (Eds.), Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes (pp. 249–268). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S., Kati, V., & Poirazidis, K. (2007). Testing the performance of landscape structure variables as predictors of biodiversity: A case study from Dadia NP, Greece. In R. G. H. Bunce et al. (Eds.), 25 years of landscape ecology: Scientific principles in practice – Proceedings of the 7th IALE world congress (pp. 337–338). The Netherlands: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K., & Wrbka, T. (2008). Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: A case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators, 8(5), 502–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M. G., Gardner R. H., & O’Neill R. V. (Eds.). (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice, pattern and process. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., & Ruscher, C. L. (1988). Changes in the spatial patterns of land use in Georgia, USA. Landscape Ecology, 1(4), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrbka, T., Erb, K. H., Schulz, N. B., Peterseil, J., Hahn, C. O., & Haberl, H. (2004). Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebisch, M., Wechsung, F., & Kenneweg, H. (2004). Landscape response functions for biodiversity – Assessing the impact of land use changes at the county level. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1–4), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, H. G., et al. (2003). The influence of land-use practices and economics on plant species richness in meadows. Biological Conservation, 114(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, H. G., & Moser, D. (2001). The influence of agricultural land-use intensity on bryophyte species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10(10), 1609–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the integrated project SENSOR (http://sensor-ip.org) financed via the 6th framework program of the European Commission. Our thanks are addressed to Katharina Helming as the project leader and Marta Perez-Soba as the module coordinator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation & Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030, Vienna, Austria

    Christa Renetzeder & Thomas Wrbka

  2. Centrum voor Geo-Informatie (Centre for Geo-Information), ALTERRA, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Sander Mücher & Michiel van Eupen

  3. Geo-Information Centre, ALTERRA, Postbus 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Michiel Kiers

Authors
  1. Christa Renetzeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Wrbka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sander Mücher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michiel van Eupen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michiel Kiers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christa Renetzeder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. in Ústí nad Labem, Department of Geography, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University, Ceske Mladeze 8, Ústí nad Labem, 40096, Czech Republic

    Jiří Anděl

  2. Faculty of Science, Department of Social Geography and, Charles University, Albertov 6, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic

    Ivan Bičík

  3. Faculty of Science, Department of Social Geography and, Charles University, Albertov 6, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic

    Petr Dostál

  4. Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and, Charles University, Albertov 6, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic

    Zdeněk Lipský

  5. , Interdisciplinary Office for Design,, SHAGAL/iodaa, Zumikerstrasse 3201A, Kusnacht-Zurich, CH-8700, Switzerland

    Siamak G. Shahneshin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renetzeder, C., Wrbka, T., Mücher, S., van Eupen, M., Kiers, M. (2010). Does Landscape Structure Reveal Ecological Sustainability?. In: Anděl, J., Bičík, I., Dostál, P., Lipský, Z., Shahneshin, S. (eds) Landscape Modelling. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3052-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation