Abstract
In everyday language the term ‘competence’ can mean proficiency or authority. A person can be a competent decision maker in the sense that as a rule he makes good and right decisions, but he can also be competent in the sense that he has the authority to make certain kinds of decision. My concern here is with competence in the sense of authority.1 The concept of legal competence, thus conceived, is a normative concept, in the sense that a person has competence by virtue of a norm, and that the exercise of competence changes a person’s normative position.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spaak, T. (2009). Explicating the Concept of Legal Competence. In: Hage, J.C., von der Pfordten, D. (eds) Concepts in Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 88. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2982-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2982-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2981-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2982-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)