Advertisement

Molecular Markers Based Approaches for Drought Tolerance

  • Deepmala Sehgal
  • Rattan Yadav
Chapter

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the most serious yield-reducing stresses in agriculture. Understanding the genetic basis of traits that can practically contribute towards development of drought resistant varieties is of paramount importance. This review focuses on the utilities of the chosen morpho-physiological traits in determining drought tolerance and provides an overview of molecular markers and genomics approaches that are available to increase the efficiency of breeding of these traits in crop breeding programmes. Suitable examples are cited where marker assisted selection (MAS) methods have started to prove useful in breeding for increased drought tolerance. Applications of model and non-model genomes in identifying functional markers associated with quantitative trait loci (QTLs), genes, and their allelic variants contributing to drought tolerance are highlighted. Genetics, genomics and molecular biology methods are also discussed for fine mapping and cloning of major QTLs as well as of their applications in developing more robust and affordable tools and technologies.

Keywords

Drought Stress Drought Tolerance Marker Assisted Selection Relative Water Content Association Mapping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and Department for International Development (DFID) for funding to their work via grant number BB/F004133/1

References

  1. Abe H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Urao T et al. (1997) Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs in drought- and Abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 9:1859–1868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abebe T, Guenzi AC, Martin B et al. (2003) Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity Plant Physiol 131:1748–1755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn S, Tanksley SD (1993) Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:7980–7984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen JR, Lǜbberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants Trends Plant Sci 8:554–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin RB, Henson IE, Quarrie SA (1982) Abscisic acid and drought resistance in wheat, millet and rice In: Drought resistance in crops with the emphasis on rice manila, IRRI, pp 171–180Google Scholar
  6. Babu CR, Nguyen BD, Chamarerk V et al. (2003) Genetic analysis of drought resistance in rice by molecular markers: association between secondary traits and field performance Crop Sci 43:1457–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahieldin A, Hesham HT, Eissa HF et al. (2005) Field evaluation of transgenic wheat plants stably expressing the HVA1 gene for drought tolerance Physiol Plant 123:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banziger M, Setimela PS, Hodson D et al. (2006) Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa. Agric Water Manage 80:212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum M, Grando S, Backes G et al. (2003) QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross ‘Arta’ × H spontaneum 41–1 Theor Appl Genet 107:1215–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernier J, Kumar A, Ramaiah V et al. (2007) A large-effect QTL for grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress in upland rice Crop Sci 47:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bidinger FR, Napolean T, Hash CT et al. (2007) Quantitative trait loci for grain yield in pearl millet under variable postflowering moisture conditions Crop Sci 47:969–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birnbaum K, Benfey PN (2004) Network building: Transcriptional circuits in the root Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:582–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birnbaum K, Shasha DE, Wang JY et al. (2003) A gene expression map of the Arabidopsis root. Science 302:1956–1960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolanos J, Edmeades GO (1996) The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crop Res 48:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brennan JP, Condon AG, Van Ginkel M et al. (2007) An economic assessment of the use of physiological selection for stomatal aperture-related traits in the CIMMYT wheat breeding programme. J Agric Sci 145:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Capell T, Escobar C, Liu H et al. (1998) Overexpression of the oat arginine decarboxylase cDNA in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L) affects normal development patterns in vitro and results in putrescine accumulation in transgenic plants. Theor appl Genet 97:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cattivelli L, Rizza F, bedeck FW et al. (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res 105:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Champoux MC, Wang G, Sarkarung S et al. (1995) Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 90:969–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chao S, Baysdorfer C, Heredia-Diaz O et al. (1994) RFLP mapping of partially sequenced leaf cDNA clones in maize. Theor Appl Genet 88:717–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chandra Babu R, Jingxian Z, Blumc A, David Hod T-H, Wue R, Nguyenf HT: HVA1, a LEA gene from barley confers dehydration tolerance in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) via cell membrane protection. Plant Sci 2004, 166:855-862.Google Scholar
  21. Collins NC, Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2008) Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: where do we stand. Plant Physiol 147:469–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cominelli E, Galbiati M, Vavasseur A et al. (2005) A guard cell specific MYB transcription factor regulates stomatal movements and plant drought tolerance. Curr Biol 15:1196–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ et al. (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55:2447–2460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Courtois B, McLaren G, Sinha PK et al. (2000) Mapping QTLs associated with drought avoidance in upland rice. Mol Breed 6:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crosbie, T.M., S.R. Eathington, G.R. Johnson, M. Edwards, R. Reiter, S. Stark, R.G. Mohanty, M. Oyervides, R.E. Buehler, A.K. Walker, R. Dobert, X. Delaney, J.C. Pershing, and M.A. Hall. 2006. Plant breeding: Past, present, and future. In K.R. Lamkey and M. Lee (ed.) Plant Breeding: Th e Arnel R. Hallauer Int. Symp., Mexico City. 17–22 Aug. 2003. Blackwell Publ., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  26. Davis D, Sanchez-Villeda H, Poroyko V et al. (2006) Root transcripts are functionally clustered in the maize genome In: Proceedings of the twenty-third annual missouri symposium plant roots: from genes to form & function, 24–25 May 2006 University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, p 99Google Scholar
  27. De Block M, Verduyn C, De Brouwer D, Cornelissen M: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in plants affects energy homeostasis, cell death and stress tolerance. Plant J 2005,41:95-106.Google Scholar
  28. Diab AA, Kantety RV, Ozturk NZ et al. (2008) Drought-inducible genes and expressed sequence tags associated with components of drought tolerance in durum wheat. Scientific Res Assay 3:9–26Google Scholar
  29. Dingkuhn M, Cruz RT, O’Toole JC et al. (1991) Responses of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits III Accumulation of abscisic acid and proline in relation to leaf water-potential and osmotic adjustment. Field Crop Res 27:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feltus FA, Singh HP, Lohithaswa HC et al. (2006) A comparative genomics strategy for targeted discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and conserved-noncoding sequences in orphan crops Plant Physiol 140:1183–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fizames C, Mu S, Cazette C et al. (2004) The Arabidopsis root transcriptome by serial analysis of gene expression: Gene identification using the genome sequence. Plant Physiol 134:67–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Francki MG, Appels R, Hunter A et al. (2004) Comparative organization of 3BS and 7AL using wheat-rice synteny. Funct Integr Genomics. doi 101007/s10142-004-0110-5Google Scholar
  33. Fredslund J, Madsen LH, Hougaard BK et al. (2006) A general pipeline for the development of anchor markers for comparative genomics in plants. BMC Genomics 7:207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R, Maruyama K, Parvez MM, Seki M, Hiratsu K, Ohme-Takagi M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K: AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE-dependent ABA-signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis, Plant Cell 2005, 17: 3470-3488.Google Scholar
  35. Gale MD, Devos KM (1998) Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:1971–1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garg A, Kim J, Owens T et al. (2002) Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:15898–15903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gaxiola RA, Li J, Undurraga S et al. (2001) Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11444–11449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giuliani S, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R et al. (2005) Root-ABA1, a major constitutive QTL, affects maize root architecture and leaf ABA concentration at different water regimes. J Exp Bot 56:3061–3070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan T-H et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L ssp japonica). Science 296:92–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gupta PK, Rustogi S (2004) Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants. Func Integr Genomics 4:139–162Google Scholar
  41. Hardenbol P, Baner J, Jain M et al. (2003) Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes. Nat Biotechnol 21:673–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haussmann BIG, Mahalakshmi V, Reddy BVS et al. (2002) QTL mapping of stay-green in two sorghum recombinant inbred populations. Theor Appl Genet 106(1):133–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hazen SP, Kay SA (2003) Gene arrays are not just for measuring gene expression. Trends Plant Sci 8:413–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hsieh TH, Lee LT, Yang PT et al. (2002b) Heterology expression of the Arabidopsis C-Repeat/Dehydration Response Element Binding Factor 1 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling and oxidative stresses in transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol 129:1086–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Innes P, Blackwell RD, Quarrie SA (1984) Some effects of genetic variation in drought-induced abscisic acid accumulation on the yield and water use of spring wheat. J agric Sci Camb 102:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ito Y, Katsura K, Maruyama K et al. (2006) Functional analysis of rice DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors involved in cold-responsive gene expression in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Physiol 47:1–13Google Scholar
  47. Johnson, R. 2004. Marker-assisted selection. Plant Breed. Rev. 24:293–309.Google Scholar
  48. Joshee N, Kisaka H, Kitagawa Y (1998) Isolation and characterization of a water stress-specific genomic gene, pwsi 18, from rice. Plant Cell Physiol 39:64–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kader J-C (1996) Lipid-transfer proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:627–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kang JY, Choi HI, Im MY et al. (2002) Arabidposis basic leucine zipper proteins that mediate stress-responsive abscisic acid signalling. Plant Cell 14:343–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Karaba A, Dixit S, Greco R et al. (2007) Improvement of water use effeiciency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15270–15275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y et al. (2002) Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day condition. Plant Cell Physiol 43:1096–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kumar LS (1999) DNA markers in plant improvement: an overview. Biotech Adv 17:143–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kwasniewski M, Szarejko I (2006) Molecular cloning and characterization of β-expansin gene related to root hair formation in barley. Plant Physiol 141:1149–1158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lancreas JC, Pantuwan G, Jongdee B et al. (2004) Quantitative trait loci associated with drought tolerance at reproductive stage in rice. Plant Physiol 135:384–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Landi P, Sanguineti MC, Liu C et al. (2007) Root-ABA1 QTL affects root lodging, grain yield and other agronomic traits in maize grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. J Exp Bot 58:319–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Landi P, Sanguineti MC, Salvi S et al. (2005) Validation and characterization of a major QTL affecting leaf ABA concentration in maize. Mol Breed 15:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Laporte MM, Shen B, Tarczynski MC (2002) Engineering for drought avoidance: expression of maize NADP-malic enzyme in tobacco results in altered stomatal function. J Exp Bot 53:699–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lebreton C, Lazic-Jancic V, Steed A et al. (1995) Identification of QTL for drought responses in maize and their use in testing causal relationships between traits. J Exp Bot 46 853–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee Y, Choi D, Kende H (2001) Expansins: ever-expanding numbers and functions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:527–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Li C, Ni P, Francki M et al. (2004) Genes controlling seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in a rice-wheat-barley comparison. Funct Integr Genomics. doi 101007/s10142-004-0104-3Google Scholar
  62. Li Y, Jones L, McQueen-Mason S (2003) Expansins and cell growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:603–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Li-Feng L, Hong-Liang Z, Ping M et al. (2007) Construction and evaluation of near-isogenic lines for major QTLs of basal root thickness and 1000-grain weight in lowland and upland rice. Chin J Agric Biotechnol 4:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lilley JM, Ludlow MM, McCouch SR et al. (1996) Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and deydration tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot 47:1427–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lohithasawa HC, Feltus FA, Singh HP et al. (2007) Leveraging the rice genome sequence for monocot comparative and translational genomics. Theor Appl Genet 115:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Corneti S et al. (2008) Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and adaptation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf) across a wide range of water availability. Genetics 178:489–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marè C, Mazzucotelli E, Crosatti C et al. (2004) Hv-WRKY 38: a new transcription factor involved in cold- and drought-response in barley. Plant Mol Biol 55:399–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature 436:866–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKersie BD, Bowley SR, Harjanto E (1996) Water-deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol 111:1177–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Morgan JM, Tan MK (1996) Chromosomal location of a wheat osmoregulation gene using RFLP analysis. Aust J Plant Physiol 23:803–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nachit MM, Monneveux P, Araus JL et al. (2000) Relationship of dryland productivity and drought tolerance with some molecular markers for possible MAS in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L var durum) Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region. New challenges pp. 203–206Google Scholar
  72. Nelson DE, Repetti PP, Adams TR et al. (2007) Plant nuclear factor Y (NY-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:16450–16455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nguyen TT, Klueva N, Chamareck V et al. (2004) Saturation mapping of QTL regions and identification of putative candidate genes for drought tolerance in rice. Mol Genet Genomics 272:35–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Novillo F, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Salinas J: CBF2/DREB1C is a negative regulator of CBF1/DREB1B and CBF3/DREB1A expression and plays a central role in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:3985-3990.Google Scholar
  75. Oh SJ, Song SI, Kim YS et al. (2005) Arabidopsis CBF3/DREB1A and ABF3 in transgenic rice increased tolerance to abiotic stress without stunting growth. Plant Physiol 138:341–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Olivares-Villegas JJ, Reynolds MP, McDonald GK (2007) Droughtadaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Funct Plant Biol 2007:34:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Park S, Li J, Pittman JK et al. (2005) Up-regulation of a H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) as a strategy to engineer drought-resistant crop plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18830–18835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Paterson AH, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME (1991) DNA markers in crop improvement In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, Academic, New York, pp 39–90Google Scholar
  79. Peleman JD, van der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 8:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pelleschi S, Guy S, Kim JY et al. (1999) Ivr2, a candidate gene for a QTL of vacuolar invertase activity in maize leaves gene-specific expression under water stress. Plant Mol Biol 39:373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pelleschi S, Leonardi A, Rocher JP et al. (2006) Analysis of the relationships between growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism using quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in young maize plants submitted to water deprivation. Mol Breed 17:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Prabuddha HR, Manjunatha K, Venuprasad R et al. (2008) Identification of near-isogenic lines: an innovative approach, validated for root and shoot morphological characters in a mapping population of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 160:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Prioul J-L, Quarrie S, Causse M et al. (1997) Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of molecular quantitative genetics. J Exp Bot 48:1151–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA et al. (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 67:170–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Qi L, Echalier B, Friebe B et al. (2003) Molecular characterization of a set of wheat deletion stocks for use in chromosome bin mapping of ESTs. Funct Integr Genomics 1–2:39–55Google Scholar
  86. Qin F, Sakuma Y, Li J, Liu Q, Li YQ, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K: Cloning and functional analysis of a novel DREB1/CBF transcription factor involved in cold-responsive gene expression in Zea mays L. Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45:1042-1052.Google Scholar
  87. Quarrie S, Lazic Jancic V, Kovacevic D et al. (1999) Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. J Exp Bot 50:1299–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rafalski A (2002) Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ragot, M., G. Gay, J.P. Muller, and J. Durovray. 2000. Efficient selection for the adaptation to the environment through QTL mapping and manipulation in maize. p. 128–130. In J.M. Ribaut and D. Poland (ed.) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A Strategic Planning Workshop, El-Batan, Mexico. 21–25 June 1999. CIMMYT, El-Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
  90. Rekika D, Nachit MM, Araus JL et al. (1998) Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity and osmotic adjustment in tetraploid wheats. Photosynthetica 129–138Google Scholar
  91. Reynolds M, Tuberosa R (2008) Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environements. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ribaut JM, Bänziger M, Betran J et al. (2002) Use of molecular markers in plant breeding: drought tolerance improvement in tropical maize In: MS Kang (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, p 85–99Google Scholar
  93. Ribaut JM, Bänziger M, Setter T et al. (2004) Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in maize: A case study In: Nguyen N, Blum A (ed) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 571–611Google Scholar
  94. Ribaut JM, Hoisington DA, Deutsch DA et al. (1996) Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize: I Flowering parameters and the anthesis-silking interval. Theor Appl Genet 92 905–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ribaut JM, Jiang C, González-de-León D et al. (1997) Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize: II Yield components and marker-assisted selection strategies. Theor Appl Genet 94 887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ribaut JM, Ragot M (2007) Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J Exp Bot 58:351–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manage 80:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Robin S, Pathan MS, Courtois B et al. (2003) Mapping osmotic adjustment in an advanced back-cross inbred population of rice. Theor Appl Genet 107:1288–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Saijo Y, Hata S, Kyozuka J et al. (2000) Over-expression of a single Ca2+-dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant J 23:319–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M et al. (2007) Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Sci U S A 104:11376–11381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Salvi S, Tuberosa R, Phillips RL (2001) Development of PCR based assays for allelic discrimination in maize by using the 5-nuclease procedure. Mol Breed 8:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sampedro J, Cosgrove DJ (2005) The expansin superfamily. Genome Biol 6:242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sanchez AC, Subudhi PK, Rosenow DT et al. (2002) Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L Moench). Plant Mol Biol 48:713–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R, Landi P et al. (1999) QTL analysis of droughtrelated traits and grain yield in relation to genetic variation for leaf abscisic acid concentration in field-grown maize. J Exp Bot 50:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sawkins MC, Farmer AD, Hoisington D et al. (2004) Comparative map and trait viewer (CMTV): An integrated bioinformatic tool to construct consensus maps and compare QTL and functional genomics data across genomes and experiments. Plant Mol Biol 56:465–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sehgal D, Bhat V, Raina SN (2008a) Advent of DNA markers to decipher genome sequence polymorphism In: Kirti PB (ed) Handbook of new technologies for genetic improvement of grain legumes, CRC, New York, pp 477–495Google Scholar
  107. Sehgal D, Bhat V, Raina SN (2008b) Applicability of DNA markers for genome diagnostics of grain legumes In: Kirti PB (ed) Handbook of new technologies for genetic improvement of grain legumes, CRC, New York, pp 497–557Google Scholar
  108. Sehgal D, Raina SN (2008c) DNA markers and germplasm resource diagnostics: new perspectives in crop improvement and conservation strategies In: Arya ID, Arya S (eds) Utilization of biotechnology in plant sciences Rastogi, Meerut, India, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  109. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J et al. (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 31:279–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Serraj R, Hash CT, Rivzi SMH et al. (2005) Recent advances in marker-assisted selection for drought tolerance in pearl millet. Plant Prod Sci 8:334–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shen L, Courtois B, McNally KL et al. (2001) Evaluation of near-isogenic lines of rice introgressed with QTLs for root depth through marker-aided selection. Theor Appl Genet 103:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Shou H, Bordallo P, Wang K (2004) Expression of the Nicotiana protein kinase (NPK1) enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic maize. J Exp Bot 55:1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Singh BN, Mackill DJ (1991) Genetics of leaf rolling under drought stress In: Rice genetics II, IRRI, Manila, pp 159–166Google Scholar
  114. Srinivas G, Satish K, Murali Mohan S et al. (2008) Development of genic-microsatellite markers for sorghum staygreen QTL using a comparative genomic approach with rice. Theor Appl Genet 117:283–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Steele KA, Price AH, Shashidhar HE et al. (2006) Marker-assisted selection to introgress rice QTLs controlling root traits into an Indian upland rice variety. Theor Appl Genet 112:208–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stemple DL (2004) TILLING: A high-throughput harvest for functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 5:145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM (2002) Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat Rev Genet 3:391–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tambussi EA, Bort J, Guiamet JJ et al. (2007) The photosynthetic role of ears in C3 cereals: metabolism, water use efficiency and contribution to grain yield. Crit Rev Plant Sci 26:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27:205–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Teulat B, This D, Khairallah M et al. (1998) Several QTLs involved in osmotic-adjustment trait variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Theor Appl Genet 96:688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Teulat B, Zoumarou-Wallis N, Rotter B et al. (2003) QTL for relative water content in field grown barleys and their stability across Mediterranean environments. Thoer Appl Genet 108:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tuberosa R, Gill BS, Quarrie SA (2002) Cereal genomics: ushering in a brave new world. Plant Mol Biol 48:445–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tuberosa R, Salvi S (2004) QTLs and genes for tolerance to abiotic stress in cereals In: Gupta PK Varshney RK (eds) Cereal genomics, Kluwer Academic, Netherlands, pp 253–315Google Scholar
  124. Tuberosa R, Salvi S (2006) Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci 11:405–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC et al. (2003) Searching for QTLs controlling root traits in maize: a critical appraisal. Plant Soil 255:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tuberosa R, Sanguineti MC, Landi P et al. (1998) RFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling abscisic acid concentration in leaves of drought-stressed maize (Zea mays L). Theor Appl Genet 97:744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tuberosa R, Silvio S, Silvia G et al. (2007) Genome-wide approaches to investigate and improve maize response to drought. Crop Sci 47 (S3) S120-S141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Tuinstra MR, Grote EM, Goldsbrough PB et al. (1996) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with preflowering drought tolerance in sorghum. Crop Sci 36:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tuyen DD, Prasad DT (2008) Evaluating difference of yield trait among rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.) under low moisture condition using candidate gene markers. Omonrice 16:24–33Google Scholar
  130. Umezawa T, Yoshida R, Maruyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K: SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:17306-17311.Google Scholar
  131. Vinod MS, Shrama N, Manjunatha K et al. (2006) Candidate genes for drought tolerance and improved productivity in rice. J Biosci 31:69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wang Xu-S, Zhu J, Mansueto L et al. (2005) Identification of candidate genes for drought stress tolerance in rice by the integration of a genetic map (QTL) map with the rice genome physical map. J Zhejiang Univ SCI 6B (5):382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M et al. (2005) Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. Plant J 43:413–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Werner JD, Borevitz JO, Warthmann N et al. (2005) Quantitative trait locus mapping and DNA array hybridization identify an FLM deletion as a cause for natural flowering-time variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2460–2465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. West MA, van Leeuwen H, Kozik A et al. (2006) High-density haplotyping with microarray-based expression and single feature polymorphism markers in Arabidopsis. Genome Res 16:787–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wu Y, Sharp RE, Durachko DM et al. (1996) Growth maintenance of the maize primary root at low water potentials involves increases in cell-wall extension properties, expansin activity, and wall susceptibility to expansins. Plant Physiol 111:765–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Wu Y, Thorne ET, Sharp RE et al. (2001) Modification of expansin transcript levels in the maize primary root at low water potentials. Plant Physiol 126:1471–1479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Xiao B, Huang Y, Tang N et al. (2007) Over-expression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor Appl Genet 115:35–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Xu W, Subudhi PK, Crasta OR et al. (2000) Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay-green in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L Moench). Genome 43:461–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yadav R, Courtois B, Huang N et al. (1997) Mapping genes controlling root morphology and root distribution in a doubled-haploid population of rice. Theor Appl Genet 94:619–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Yadav RS, Hash CT, Bidinger FR et al. (2002) Quantitative trait loci associated with traits determining grain and stover yield in pearl millet under terminal drought stress conditions. Theor Appl Genet 104:67–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yadav RS, Hash CT, Bidinger FR et al. (2004) Genomic regions associated with grain yield and aspects of post-flowering drought tolerance in pearl millet across stress environments and testers background. Euphytica 136:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikeri M et al. (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–2484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L ssp indica). Science 296:79–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zhang J, Zheng HG, Aarti A et al. (2001) Locating genomic regions associated with components of drought resistance in rice: Comparative mapping within and across species. Theor Appl Genet 103:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zheng BS, Yang L, Zhang WP et al. (2003) Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for rice root traits under different water-supply conditions and comparative analysis across three populations. Theor Appl Genet 107:1505–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zhu BC, Su J, Chan MC et al. (1998) Overexpression of a d-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water-stress and salt-stress in transgenic rice. Plant Sci 139:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES et al. (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome 1:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Zhu J, Kaeppler SM, Lynch JP (2005) Mapping of QTLs for lateral root branching and length in maize (Zea mays L) under differential phosphorus supply. Theor Appl Genet 111:688–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS)Aberystwyth UniversityGogerddan, AberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations