Metabolomics in Fruit Development

  • Kati Hanhineva
  • Asaph AharoniEmail author


Metabolomics aims at the efficient determination of multiple chemical constituents present in a tissue, a cell layer or ideally a single cell. Metabolomics is currently applied in a large number of life science disciplines. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) or Gas- and Liquid-Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS) are the most widespread technologies employed in metabolomics assays. Soft fruit, one of the most metabolite-rich plant organs, was from the first to be subjected to metabolomics investigation. The interest in metabolite profiling of soft fruit could be explained by the large repertoire of metabolites belonging to diverse chemical classes that are formed and catabolized during fruit development, starting from the fertilized ovary up to the ripe, mature fruit. Moreover, fruit constitute an essential part of our diet and the breeding to achieve nutrient-rich varieties entails a comprehensive analysis of their metabolite content. Presently, hundreds of substances, including primary and secondary (or specialized) metabolites have been detected in fruit. Metabolomics has been employed also for following metabolism in transgenic plants, mutants and introgression lines populations. The latter experiments allowed the identification of genomic regions associated with metabolic quality traits. So far, most metabolomics assays in fruit have been focused on two species, namely, tomato and strawberry. It is expected that in the following years the use of metabolomics will be expanded to the investigation of numerous other fruit species.


Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fruit Development Tomato Fruit Metabolite Profile Strawberry Fruit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aaby K, Skrede G, Wrolstad RE (2005) Phenolic composition and antioxidant activities in flesh and achenes of strawberries (Fragaria ananassa). J Agric Food Chem 53:4032–4040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aharoni A, DeVos CHR, Verhoeven HA et al. (2002) Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometry. OMICS 6:217–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bewley JD, Black M (1994) Seeds: physiology of development and germination, Ed. 2. Plenum, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Bino RJ, deVos CHR, Lieberman M et al. (2005) The light-hyperresponsive high pigment-2 dg mutation of tomato: alterations in the fruit metabolome. New Phytol 166:427–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SC, Kruppa G, Dasseux JL (2005) Metabolomics applications of FT-ICR mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 24:223–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrari F, Fernie AR (2006) Metabolic regulation underlying tomato fruit development. J Exp Bot 57:1883–1897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Damian D, Orešič M, Verheij E et al. (2007) Applications of a new subspace clustering algorithm (COSA) in medical systems biology. Metabolomics 3:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD (2007) Mass-spectrometry based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 26:51–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn WB, Bailey NJC, Johnson HE (2005) Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst 130:606–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fait A, Hanhineva K, Beleggia R et al. (2008) Reconfiguration of the achene and receptacle metabolic networks during strawberry fruit development. Plant Physiol 148:730–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernie AR, Trthewey RN, Krotzky AJ et al. (2004) Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology. Nat Rev 5:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P et al. (2000) Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol 18:1157–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiehn O, Sumner LW, Rhee SY et al. (2007) Minimum reporting standards for plant biology context information in metabolomic studies. Metabolomics 3:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser PD, Bramley PM (2006) Metabolic profiling and quantification of carotenoids and related isoprenoids in crop plants. In: Saito K, Dixon R, Willmitzer L (eds) Plant metabolomics, Heidelberg, Springer,Germany, pp 229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraser PD, Pinto MES, Holloway DE et al. (2000) Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection to the metabolic profiling of plant isoprenoids. Plant J 24:551–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser PD, Enfissi EMA, Goodfellow M et al. (2007a) Metabolite profiling of plant carotenoids using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. Plant J 49:552–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser PD, Enfissi EMA, Halket JM et al. (2007b) Manipulation of phytoene levels in tomato fruit: effects on isoprenoids, plastids, and intermediary metabolism. Plant Cell 19:3194–3211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritz JS (2004) Early milestones in the development of ion-exchange chromatography: a personal account. J Chromatogr A 1039:3–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fulton TM, Bucheli P, Voirol E et al. (2002) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavour, identified in four advanced backgross populations of tomato. Euphytica 127:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W (1993) Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5:1439–1451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Glinski M, Weckwerth W (2006) The role of mass spectrometry in plant systems biology. Mass Spectrom Rev 25:173–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Giovannoni JJ (2007) Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:283–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Giovannoni JJ, Noensie EN, Ruezinsky DM et al. (1995) Molecular genetic analysis of the ripening-inhibitor and non-ripening loci of tomato: A first step in genetic map-based cloning of fruit ripening genes. Mol Gen Genet 248:195–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Halket JM, Waterman D, Przyborowska AM et al. (2005) Chemical derivatization and mass spectral libraries in metabolic profiling by GC/MS and LC/MS/MS. J Exp Bot 56:219–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall RD (2005) Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. New Phytol 169:453–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hancock JF (2000) Strawberries. In A Erez (ed) Temperate fruit crops in warm climates. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Hannum SM (2004) Potential impact of strawberries on human health: a review of the science. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44:1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hukkanen AT, Kokko HI, Buchala AJ et al. (2007) Benzothiadiazole induces the accumulation of phenolics and improves resistance to powdery mildew in strawberries. J Agric Food Chem 55:1862–1870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Iijima Y, Nakamura, Y, Ogata Y et al. (2008) Metabolite annotations based on the integration of mass spectral information. Plant J. 54:949–962Google Scholar
  30. Katajamaa M, Orešič M (2005) Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 6:179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Katajamaa M, Orešič M (2007) Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J Chromatogr A 1158:318–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ketchum REB, Croteau RB (2006) The taxus metabolome and the elucidation of the Taxol biosynthetic pathway in cell suspension cultures. In: Saito K, Dixon R, Willmitzer L (eds) Plant metabolomics, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koponen JM, Happonen AM, Mattila PH et al. (2007) Contents of anthocyanins in selected foods consumed in Finland. J Agric Food Chem 55:1612–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Krishnan P, Kruger NJ, Ratcliffe RG (2005) Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. J Exp Bot 56:255–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kähkönen MP, Hopia AI, Heinonen M (2001) Berry phenolics and their antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 49:4076–4082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lange BM (2006) Integrative analysis of metabolic networks: from peaks to flux models? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:220–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lippman ZB, Semel Y, Zamir D (2007) An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:545–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mattoo AK, Sobolev AP, Neelam A et al. (2006) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling of transgenic tomato fruit engineered to accumulate spermidine and spermine reveals enhanced anabolic and nitrogen-carbon interactions. Plant Phys 142:1759–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mintz-Oron S, Mandel T, Rogachev I et al. (2008) Gene expression and metabolism in tomato fruit surface tissues. Plant Phys. 147:823–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moco S, Bino RJ, Vorst O et al. (2006) A liquid chromatography–mass-spectrometry-based metabolome database for tomato. Plant Physiol 141:1205–1218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Moco S, Capanoglu E, Tikunov Y et al. (2007) Tissue specialization at the metabolite level is perceived during the development of tomato fruit. J Exp Bot 58:4131–4146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Moing A, Renauld C, Gaudillere M et al. (2001) Biochemical changes during fruit development of four strawberry cultivars. J Am Soc Hort Sci 126:394–403Google Scholar
  43. Morgenthal K, Weckwerth W, Steuer R (2006) Metabolomic networks in plants: transitions from pattern recognition to biological interpretation. BioSystems 83:108–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mullen W, Yokota T, Lean MEJ (2003) Analysis of ellagitannins and conjugates of ellagic acid and quercetin in raspberry fruits by LC-MSn. Phytochemistry 64:617–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Neelam A, Cassol T, Mehta RA et al. (2008) A field grown transgenic tomato line expressing higher levels of polyamines reveals legume cover crop mulch-specific perturbations in fruit phenotype at the levels of metabolite profiles, gene expression, and agronomic characteristics. J Exp Bot 59:2337–2346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Puupponen-Pimiä R, Nohynek L, Hartmann-Schmidlin S et al. (2005) Berry phenolics selectively inhibit the growth of intestinal pathogens. J Appl Microbiol 98:991–1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Robles P, Pelaz S (2005) Flower and fruit development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Dev Biol 49:633–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roessner U, Luedemann A, Brust D, Fiehn O, Linke T, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR (2001) Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13:11–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Roessner-Tunali U, Hegemann B, Lytovchenko A et al. (2003) Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phophorylation diminishes during fruit development. Plant Physiol 133:84–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan D, Robards K (2006) Metabolomics: the greatest omics of them all? Anal Chem 78:7954–7958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Saito K, Dixon R, Willmitzer L (2006) (eds) Plant metabolomics. Springer, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  52. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U et al. (2006) Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotech 24:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I et al. (2008) Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell 20:509–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Seger C, Sturm S (2007) Analytical aspects of plant metabolite profiling platforms: Current standings and future aims. J Proteome Res 6:480–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Shinbo Y, Nakamura Y, Altaf-Ul-Amin M et al. (2006) KNApSAcK: a comprehensive species-metabolite relationship database. In: Saito K, Dixon RA, Willmitzer L (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and Forestry, vol. 57. Plant metabolomics Springer, Berlin pp.165–181Google Scholar
  56. Tikunov Y, Lommen A, deVos CHR et al. (2005) A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol 139:1125–1137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Unger KK (2004) Scientific achievements of Jack Kirkland to the development of HPLC and in particular to HPLC silica packings – a personal perspective. J Chromatogr A 1060:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward JL, Baker JM, Beale MH (2007) Recent applications of NMR spectroscopy in plant metabolomics. FEBS J 274:1126–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Werner RA, Rossmann A, Schwartz C et al. (2004) Biosynthesis of gallic acid in Rhus typhina: discrimination between alternative pathways from natural oxygen isotope abundance. Phytochemistry 65:2809–2813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Villas-Boas SG, Mas S, Åkesson M et al. (2005) Mass spectrometry in metabolome analysis. Mass Spectrom Rev 24:613–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of KuopioKuopioFinland
  2. 2.The Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations