Skip to main content

Generalized Phase Contrast

  • Chapter
Generalized Phase Contrast

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Optical Sciences ((SSOS,volume 146))

Light intensity is easily quantified by using calibrated detectors that can directly exploit the energy flux from an incident light. Spatial intensity variations can be imaged using an array of such energy detectors, as in a camera, for instance. On the other hand, light phase is invisible to energy detectors and is usually detected indirectly by exploiting phase-dependent phenomena that affect intensity. For example, intercepting light with a lenslet array would generate an array of spots at the common focal plane of the lenslets and any phase perturbations could be deduced from observed changes in the configuration of the intensity spots. When using coherent illumination, a common method consists of introducing a reference beam and then analyzing the phase-dependent interference pattern to determine the phase perturbation. Working without the benefit of coherent laser sources, Gabor invented the first holograms capable of interferometri-cally recording phase information by adapting Zernike's phase contrast configuration, where the reference and the object beams propagate along a common path to ensure coherence [1]. Aside from coherence, common-path interferometry also surmounts typical experimental hurdles that tend to smear out the interference pattern with its relative tolerance to vibrations and fluctuations in the ambient conditions, which becomes a major problem when the reference beam travels along a different path.

The accuracy of the extracted phase information from the output of an interferometer is dependent on assumptions about the reference wave, and this is no different for a common-path interferometer. Thus it is vital to examine how a phase contrast method models the reference wave in order to understand its limitations. In this chapter, we examine the assumptions employed in Zernike's phase contrast method. Although sufficient for very thin phase objects like biological samples, its limited range of validity necessitates a generalized formulation to encompass a wider range and broaden the horizon for possible applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Gabor, “Holography, 1948–1971,” from Nobel Lectures, Physics 1971–1980, Editor Stig Lundqvist, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Zernike, “How I discovered phase contrast”, Science 121, 345–349 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Zernike, “Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects. Part I,” Physica 9, 686–698 (1942).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Zernike, “Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects. Part II,” Physica 9, 974–986(1942).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, 2nd ed., 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. B. Henning, “A new scheme for viewing phase contrast images”, Electro-optical Systems Design 6, 30–34 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. O. Reynolds, J. B. Develis, G. B. Parrent, Jr., B. J. Thompson, The New Physical Optics Notebook: Tutorials in Fourier Optics, (SPIE Optical Engineering Press, New York 1989) Chap. 35.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. H. H. Hopkins, “A note on the theory of phase-contrast images”, Proc. Phys. Soc. B., 66, 331–333 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. F. Paul, “Dark-ground illumination as a quantitative diagnostic for plasma density”, Appl. Opt., 21, 2531–2537 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. C. Anderson and S. Lewis, “Flow visualization by dark central ground interfer-ometry”, Appl. Opt. 24, 3687 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. P. Loomis, M. Holt, G. T. Chapman and M. Coon, “Applications of dark central ground interferometry”, Proc. of the 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 91–0565, 1–8 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Malacara, Optical shop Testing, 302–305 (John Wiley & Sons, New York 2nd ed., 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. K. Aggarwal and S. K. Kaura, “Further applications of point diffraction interferometer”, J. Optics (Paris) 17, 135–138 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 426–427 (Pergamon Press, 6th ed., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. A. Mack, “Phase contrast lithography”, Proc. SPIE 1927, 512–520 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Arieli, N. Eisenberg and A. Lewis, “Pattern generation by inverse phase contrast”, Opt. Comm. 138, 284–286 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Canopus Academic Publishing Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Generalized Phase Contrast. In: Generalized Phase Contrast. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 146. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2839-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics