Skip to main content

How the Models of Engineering Tell the Truth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Engineering:

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 2))

Abstract

Models are one of the more important ways in which scientists and engineers understand and engage with the world. Philosophers of science have analyzed how modeling idealizes the world, helps explain events and supports our understanding. I advocate the study of models and modeling practice in engineering. I analyze two classic case studies on flush riveting and control volume analysis from Walter Vincenti as well as a set of models used in the evaluation of levee failures in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Engineers use a variety of different kinds of models and understanding how each model is used to guide understanding is worthwhile. Among the questions raised are how models guide processes of testing and design; what sorts of idealizations do engineers include in their models; and how do engineers use independent models to try to generate robust agreement between model results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bechtel, William and Andrew Hamilton. 2006. Natural, Behavioral, Social Sciences and the Humanities: Reductionism and the Unity of the Sciences. In Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues, ed. Theo Kuipers, 377–430. Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario. 1972. Toward a Philosophy of Technology. In Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, eds., Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey, 62–76. The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Callender, Craig and Jonathan Cohen. 2006. There is No Special Problem about Scientific Representation. Theoria 55:67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas-Badallo, Anna. 2005. The Model-Based Approach for Technological Theory. Techne 9(2): 18–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. Michael and Stephen G. Wright. 2005. Soil Strength and Slope Stability. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Robert et al. 2004. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, Ronald. 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2005. The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy 21: 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl and Paul Oppenheim. 1948. Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15: 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Performance Evaluation Taskforce. 2007. Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System, Final Report of the Interagency Performance Evaluation Task Force. Volume V—The Performance—Levees and Floodwalls. Available at: [https://ipet.wes.army.mil/]

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, Richard. 1966. The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology. American Scientist 54(4): 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Elisabeth. 1994. The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects. 2006. Third Report of the NAE/NRC Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, Joseph. 1999. Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology. Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, Frederick (Editor with critical introduction). 1974. The Structure of Scientific Theory. 2nd Edition. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, Walter. 1990. What Engineers Know and How they Know it. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, William. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piece-wise Approximations to Reality. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Casual Explanation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I owe a deep debt of gratitude to Andrew Hamilton and the Program in History and Philosophy of Science at ASU for helping to shape my ideas and in editing the chapter. I am thankful for substantial comments from Edward Kavazanjian and for financial support from the WPE committee, CSPO and the Society for Philosophy and Technology to attend the WPE meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pirtle, Z. (2009). How the Models of Engineering Tell the Truth. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics