Abstract
I suggest that postmodern engineering move in the direction of what I am calling focal engineering. The notion of focal comes from the advocacy of Albert Borgmann for focal things and practices to engage our lives, as a counter to the disengaging tendencies of modern technology. I propose to look at what focal engineering might be, what the experience of it might entail, and how it could be assessed. The German language has two words, Erlebnis and Erfahrung, that both translate into the English word experience. Erfahrung is reflective, mediated, second-hand experience, our ordinary everyday experience. Erlebnis is our first-hand immediate experience, the Augenblick experience, the moment of vision, or the “a-ha” experience. These two notions of experience will play a role in the ethical assessment of the engineering project. Three types of ethics emerge, one relevant to the person (engineer), another to the process (engineering), and the third to the product (the engineered). Each type of ethics will initially seek an Erlebnis assessment, then an Erfahrung experience, then a circle back to the beginning for another Erlebnis, etc. Such a progression is a hermeneutic circle. A couple of circles around the Erlebnis/Erfahrung constellation should provide an authentic ethical assessment of the focal engineering experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Arthos, J. 2000. To be alive when something happens: retrieving Dilthey’s Erlebnis. Janus Head. http://www.janushead.org/3-1/jarthos.cfm. Accessed 03 March 2007.
Borgmann, A. 1992. Crossing the postmodern divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davis, M. 2001. Three myths about codes of engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 20: 8–22.
Gadamer, H. 1993. Truth and method, 2nd rev. ed. (trans) Weinsheimer, J. and D. G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.
Grundahl, J. 1995. The Danish consensus conference model. In Public participation in science: the role of consensus conferences in Europe, eds. Joss, S. and J. Durant. London Science Museum. http://www.ucalgary.ca/˜pubconf/Education/grundahl.htm. Accessed 03 March 2007.
Heidegger, M. 1973. Overcoming metaphysics. In The end of philosophy. (trans) Stambaugh, J. 84–110. New York: Harper & Row.
Hudspith, B. and M. Kim 2002. Learning from a university-cosponsored regional consensus conference. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 22: 232–238.
Jay, M. 2004. Songs of experience: modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moriarty, G. (2009). The Focal Engineering Experience. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2803-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2804-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)