Abstract
The central questions of this chapter are: What is the setting of a learned work of engineering? Is that setting unique to engineering? The chapter argues that there are at least two settings: one, the real world in which engineering employs methods that seem to simulate the methods of mathematics and science; the other, the hyperreal world known as the assigned world in which engineering employs no simulations. While the question of uniqueness invites a more exhaustive inquiry into many learned disciplines than ventured herein, it can be said that when engineering is done in the real world it is done differently in some ways from mathematics and science, and that neither mathematics nor science is done in a hyperreal world whose natural laws are made from authoritative imperatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Broome, T.H. 1985. Engineering the Philosophy of Science. Metaphilosophy 16(1): 47–56.
Broome, T.H. 2002. Philosophy of Engineering. Keynote Address: Ethics Across the Curriculum, Annual Meeting. Clemson University, Columbia, SC—October 26.
Broome, T.H. 2004. Grammars of Exactitude in Science and Engineering. Speaker: Mathematics Colloquium, Department of Mathematics, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD—September 30.
Bruner, J.S. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Campbell, J. 1973. The Hero With a Thousand Faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davis, M. 1998. Thinking Like An Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferguson, E. 1979. Imperatives of Engineering. In Connections: Technology and Change, eds. Burke, J. et al., 30–31. San Francisco, CA: Boyd and Fraser.
Gorman, M. 1992. Simulating Science: Heuristics, Mental Models, and Technoscientific Thinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hanson, R.N. 1979. Patterns of Discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koen, B.V. 2003. Discussion of the Method. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morris, C.W. 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, J.R. 1982. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.
Wittgenstein, L. 1970 (1967). Zettel, §55. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broome, T.H. (2009). Metaphysics of Engineering. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2803-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2804-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)