Abstract
Engineering is a unique profession in many ways. It is the oldest professional activities whose practitioners can be held to account for their failures, according to publicly promulgated standards. This is partly because engineering is such a pervasive profession, but also because engineering “failures” are usually highly visible and sometimes spectacular. Engineers go to enormous lengths to avoid “failure”. However, the public has little understanding of what engineers do, because they do not understand the nature of risk or the limited extent to which individual engineers are responsible for the construction, use and maintenance of their designs. Integrity is explained in this chapter as not so much a virtue but rather as a coherence or synthesis of the virtues, including an unwillingness to compromise ones values for gain. Professional integrity requires a commitment to the goals and values of the profession, and a person of integrity will not take up such a profession unless they can do so without compromising their personal values and ideals. Because of the complex nature of engineering as a profession, engineering integrity is also complex, and engineering education should emphasize this.
Parts of this chapter that deal with the concept of integrity will appear in a monograph on integrity to be published by the Centre for Civilisational Dialogue, University of Malaya, in 2008.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alpert, Kenneth. 1982. Engineers as Moral Heroes. In Beyond Whistleblowing: Defining Engineers’ Responsibilities, ed. Vivian Weil, 40–51. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology
Beder, Sharon. April, 1998. Australian engineers not alone in low public profile, Engineers Australia, 18: 64.
Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute website. http://www.helmets.org/stats.htm. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Carter, Stephen L. 1996. Integrity. New York: Basic Books.
Cox, Damien, Marguerite La Caze, and Michael Levine. 2005. Integrity, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/integrity. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Florman, Samuel M. 1976. The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Gambetta, Diego and Steffen Hertog. 2007. Engineers of Jihad. Sociology Working Paper 2007–10. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.
Greenberg, Dan. 2008. Absent from Politics, As Usual: Scientists and Engineers, The Chronicle Review, January 5, http://chronicle.com/review/brainstorm/greenberg/absent-from-politics-as-usual-scientists-and-engineers. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Gunn, Alastair S. and P. Aarene Vesilind. 2005. Hold Paramount: The Engineer’s Responsibility to Society. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 1991. Moral Purity and the Lesser Evil. In Autonomy and Self-Respect, ed. Hill, 67–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaczynski, Theodore. Undated. Industrial Society and Its Future. (“The Unabomber Manifesto”). Available at http://www.thecourier.com/manifest.htm. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Kay, Fiona M. 2005. Integrity in a Changing Profession: Issues of Diversity and Inclusion. http://www.lsuc.on.ca/media/kaydiversityintegrity.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Kowalenko, Kathy. 2000. Engineering Alliance Works to Improve U.S. Public’s Image and Awareness of Engineers. The Institute (IEEE), 1 December, http://www.theinstitute.ieee.org/portal/site/tionline/menuitem.130a3558587d56e8fb2275875bac26c8/index.jsp?&pName=institute_level1_article&TheCat=2201&article=tionline/legacy/INST2000/dec00/falliance.xml&;. Accessed 5 June 2008.
McCarter, Pender. 2005. IEEE-USA Promotes Engineering Public Awareness in Myriad Venues. IEEE-USA Today’s Engineer Online. August. http://www.todaysengineer.org/2005/Aug/public_awareness.asp. Accessed 5 June 2008.
National Transportation Safety Board. 2008. US Transportation Fatalities: 2005. http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=6777. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Professions Jokes website. http://www.workjoke.com/projoke27.htm. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Solomon, Robert C. 1999. A Better Way to Think About Business: How Personal Integrity Leads You to Corporate Success.New York: Oxford University Press.
Torisky, Eugene. Undated. Integrity and Supererogation in Ethical Communities, httrp://http://www.bu.edu/wcp/papers/Soci/Soci/Tori.htm. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Wiewiora Jennifer A. 2005. Engineers’ Involvement in Politics? Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 131(2): 102–104.
Wikipedia. 2008. Aggie Bonfire. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggie_Bonfire. Accessed 5 June 2008.
Acknowledgements
To the organizers of the Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, for inviting me to make the presentation on which this chapter is based, and for their generous contribution to my expenses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gunn, A.S. (2009). Integrity and the Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2803-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2804-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)