Abstract
In natural plant communities, reproductive allocation can be affected by complex interactions among abiotic resources, species competition and plant size. This topic was addressed using a variety of designed mixed stands of five species (Carex elata, Carex flava, Lycopus europaeus, Lysimachia vulgaris and Mentha aquatica) under four abiotic conditions to investigate how competition and abiotic resources influence the reproductive allocation of one of the five species, C. flava. The plant mixtures varied systematically in both the relative abundance of the five species and the absolute density, and were each established with two levels of water and nutrients. In total, 176 mixtures were maintained for two growing seasons in large pots in an experimental garden. Reproductive allocation of C. flava increased from 6.8% to 9.7% under high nutrient application; however, for both nutrient levels, reproductive allocation was independent of shoot mass (size-independent allocation). Under low competition, reproductive allocation of C. flava decreased as its shoot mass increased, indicating a relatively high investment in vegetative structures under higher light availability. However, under strong competition, the allocation pattern changed and a constant reproductive allocation for different plant sizes was observed. Different water levels did not influence the shoot mass, seed mass or reproductive allocation of C. flava, indicating that the species was not stressed under dryer conditions. When under competitive pressure, however, the species responded with reduced shoot and seed production under more favourable water conditions. This behaviour indicates a trade-off between the ability to tolerate stress and the competitive and reproductive response of C. flava. In conclusion, C. flava was adversely affected by competition with some of the species, and competition, mediated by plant size, indirectly affected reproductive allocation. C. flava was able to modify its allocation pattern depending on the available resources and retained its reproductive allocation even under unfavourable conditions for varying plant sizes, which is interpreted as an advantageous reaction to greater competition pressure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aeschimann D, Heitz C (2005) Synonymie-Index der Schweizer Flora. Zentrum des Datenverbundnetzes der Schweizer Flora, Bern
Arenas F, Viejo RM, Fernandez C (2002) Density-dependent regulation in an invasive seaweed: responses at plant and modular levels. J Ecol 90:820–829. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00720.x
Campbell BD, Grime JP (1992) An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology 73:15–29. doi:10.2307/1938717
Cheplick GP (2001) Quantitative genetics of mass allocation and the allometry of reproduction in Amaranthus albus: relation to soil nutrients. Int J Plant Sci 162:807–816. doi:10.1086/320778
Chiariello NR, Gulmon SL (1991) Stress effects on plant reproduction. In: Mooney HA, Winner WE, Pell EJ et al (eds) Response of plants to multiple stresses. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 161–188
Cornell JA (2002) Experiments with mixtures. Wiley, New York, USA
Edelkraut KA, Guesewell S (2006) Progressive effects of shading on experimental wetland communities over three years. Plant Ecol 183:315–327. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9042-y
Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Deutschland
Emery SM, Gross KL (2007) Dominant species identity, not community evenness, regulates invasion in experimental grassland plant communities. Ecology 88:954–964. doi:10.1890/06-0568
Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Hara T, Kawano S, Nagai Y (1988) Optimum reproductive strategy of plants, with special reference to the modes of reproductive resource allocation. Plant Species Biol 3:43–59. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1988.tb00170.x
Harper JL, Ogden J (1970) The reproductive strategy of higher plants. I. The concept of strategy with special reference to Senecio vulgaris L. J Ecol 58:681–698. doi:10.2307/2258529
Hendriks AJ, Mulder C (2008) Scaling of offspring number and mass to plant and animal size: model and meta-analysis. Oecologia 155:705–716. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0952-3
Karlsson PS, Méndez M (2005) The resource economy in plant reproduction. In: Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (eds) Reproductive allocation in plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–49
Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, Nell HW (1994) Limiting factors for seed production and phenotypic gender in the gynodioecious species Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos 71:469–478. doi:10.2307/3545835
Lauber K, Wagner G (2007) Flora Helvetica. Paul Haupt, Bern, Schweiz
Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2005) Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86:1611–1618. doi:10.1890/04-1398
Méndez M, Karlsson PS (2004) Between-population variation in size-dependent reproduction and reproductive allocation in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae) and its environmental correlates. Oikos 104:59–70. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12335.x
Pauli D, Peintinger M, Schmid B (2002) Nutrient enrichment in calcareous fens: effects on plant species and community structure. Basic Appl Ecol 3:255–266. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00096
Ramseier D, Connolly J, Bazzaz FA (2005) Carbon dioxide regime, species identity and influence of species initial abundance as determinants of change in stand biomass composition in five-species communities: an investigation using a simplex design and RGRD analysis. J Ecol 93:502–511. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00999.x
R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org
Reekie EG (1998) An explanation for size-dependent reproductive allocation in Plantago major. Can J Bot 76:43–50. doi:10.1139/cjb-76-1-43
Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (eds) (2005) Reproductive allocation in plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sadras VO, Bange MP, Milroy SP (1997) Reproductive allocation of cotton in response to plant and environmental factors. Ann Bot (Lond) 80:75–81. doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0402
Schmid B (1984) Life histories in clonal plants of the Carex flava group. J Ecol 72:93–114. doi:10.2307/2260008
Schmid B (1986) Colonizing plants with persistent seeds and persistent seedlings (Carex flava group). Bot Helv 96:19–26
Sletvold N (2002) Effects of plant size on reproductive output and offspring performance in the facultative biennial Digitalis purpurea. J Ecol 90:958–966. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00725.x
Suding KN, Goldberg DE, Hartman KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84:1–16. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0001:RASTSL]2.0.CO;2
Sugiyama S, Bazzaz FA (1998) Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity. Funct Ecol 12:280–288. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00187.x
Susko DJ, Lovett DL (2000) Plant-size and fruit-position effects on reproductive allocation in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Can J Bot 78:1398–1407. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-11-1398
Suter M, Ramseier D, Guesewell S et al (2007) Convergence patterns and multiple species interactions in a designed plant mixture of five species. Oecologia 151:499–511. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0594-x
van der Hoek D, van Mierlo AJE, van Groenendael J (2004) Nutrient limitation and nutrient-driven shifts in plant species composition in a species-rich fen meadow. J Veg Sci 15:389–396. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0389:NLANSI]2.0.CO;2
Weiner J (1988) The influence of competition on plant reproduction. In: Lovett Doust L (ed) Plant reproductive ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 228–245
Whitfield CP, Davison AW, Ashenden TW (1998) The effects of nutrient limitation on the response of Plantago major to ozone. New Phytol 140:219–230. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00277.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suter, M. (2008). Reproductive allocation of Carex flava reacts differently to competition and resources in a designed plant mixture of five species. In: Van der Valk, A.G. (eds) Herbaceous Plant Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2797-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2798-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)