Skip to main content

First Diamond

‘Damage tolerance’ for the structural honeymoon

  • Conference paper
ICAF 2009, Bridging the Gap between Theory and Operational Practice
  • 3894 Accesses

This paper offers a fresh and simple approach to setting the threshold for structural inspections. It shows how damage tolerance and the diamond work the same as for any other interval, and how they would work even better with risk management, human factors and less prescriptive regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eastin, R. and Swift, S. (2005), Rough Diamond, Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF Symposium, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moubray, J. (1997), RCM II, Reliability-centred maintenance, Second edition, pages 145 and 162, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher, J. (2007), A Review of Philosophies, Processes, Methods and Approaches that Protect In-Service Aircraft from the Scourge of Fatigue Failures, Proceedings of the 24th ICAF Symposium, Naples, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swift, S. (2007), Rusty Diamond, Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broek, D. (1988), The Practical Use of Fracture Mechanics, page 7, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston and London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Swift, S. (1995), The Aero Commander Chronicle, Proceedings of the 18th ICAF Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, EMAS, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swift, S. (1999), Gnats and Camels, Proceedings of the 20th ICAF Symposium, Bellevue, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. FAA (1998), Damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure, FAR 25.571, Amendment 25–96, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Air Transport Association (2007), ATA MSG-3, Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development, Revision 2007.1, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emmerson, A. (1992), Airworthiness Control in the Face of Structural Fatigue, Proceedings of the Ageing Commuter Aircraft Conference, Canberra, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  11. FAA (2005), Fatigue, Fail-Safe, And Damage Tolerance Evaluation Of Metallic Structure For Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, And Commuter Category Airplanes, AC 23–13A, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. FAA (2008), Fatigue Management Programs for Airplanes with Demonstrated Risk of Catastrophic Failure Due to Fatigue, AC 91–82, page 17, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Medina, M, Kimmins, S, Rodrigo, P. (2005), Using the Initial Flaw Concept in Current and Future Aircraft Certifications, Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF Symposium, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  14. Broek, D. (1995), Manual for the Damage Tolerance Analysis of Repairs and Modifications of Aircraft Structures, FracturResearch TN 9501, page 79, Galena, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. ICAO (2006), Safety Management Manual (SMM), Doc 9859, AN/460, First Edition, page 6–2, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoeppner, D. (2002), From Safe Life to Holistic Structural Integrity Design, Presentation for NRC IAR Structures Workshop, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  17. FAA (1997), Maintenance Review Board Procedures, AC 121–22A, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. FAA (2000), Development of Supplemental Inspection Report for the Fairchild Metro SA226 and SA227 Airplane, DOT/FAA/AR-00/18, Office of Aviation Research, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. International MRB Policy Board (2008), Evolution/Optimization Guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swift, S. (2008), A Collective Approach to Aircraft Structural Maintenance Programs, Proceedings of the International Air Safety Seminar, Honolulu, Flight Safety Foundation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. FAA (1998), Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure, AC 25.571–1C, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. EASA (2008), Wings — Movable Flap Track Fairing — Inspection/Replacement, AD 2008–0216, Cologne, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  23. FAA (1996), Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure, FAR 23.573, Amendment 23–48, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2002), Investigation into Ansett Australia maintenance safety deficiencies and the control of continuing airworthiness of Class A aircraft, Report BS/20010005, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clark, G. (2005), A Review of Australian and New Zealand Investigations on Aeronautical Fatigue During the Period April 2003 to March 2005, DST-TN-0624, DSTO Platforms Sciences Laboratory, Australia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Swift, S. (2009). First Diamond. In: Bos, M.J. (eds) ICAF 2009, Bridging the Gap between Theory and Operational Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2746-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2746-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2745-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2746-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics