Abstract
There are three principal reasons for a substantive contemporary engagement with Kant and the following study attempts to articulate the inner unity between them. The first Critique represents a fundamental alternative to the prevailing currents of contemporary philosophy (Chapter 1.2), and one which directly addresses two characteristic features of our own time: the process of epistemic as well as political globalisation (Chapter 1.3) and the contemporary dominance of the (natural) sciences (Chapter 1.4). But we begin with a brief consideration of the historical significance of Kant’s thought as a whole (Chapter 1.1). The present work is not intended as a contribution to Kant hagiography, but it certainly aims to contest that hagiographical tendency of the present which regards the philosophical approach generally adopted during the last couple of generations, and especially that belonging to one specific tradition, as the best foundation for engaging in systematic philosophy. For in confronting the first Critique, we are undeniably encountering a work of ‘world literature’: a text that does not belong to the past, but one which still possesses fundamental relevance for the present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Höffe, O. (2009). Four Reasons for Engaging with Kant’s First Critique . In: Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Studies in German Idealism, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2722-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2722-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2721-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2722-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)