Skip to main content

Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Physical Principles of Contamination Spreading

  • Conference paper
Decision Support for Natural Disasters and Intentional Threats to Water Security

Several methods of groundwater vulnerability assessment have been developed since 1970s in order to derive vulnerability maps, taking account of hydrogeological settings and field investigations. Majority of those relied on counting of points related to various hydrogeological factors with different, mostly subjective rating. More physical understanding to this topic was added by Brouyére et al. (2001) and Jeannin et al. (2001). Such definitions of groundwater vulnerability are based on contamination spreading principles. As the contamination evolves in the groundwater, it is affected by different intrinsic hydrodynamic and hydrodispersive mechanisms, altering progressively its spatial and temporal distribution. Main intrinsic hydrodispersive processes in underground are advection, hydrodynamic dispersion, physical retardation and dilution. For intrinsic groundwater vulnerability, three factors describing pollution by conservative contaminant are defined: contaminant transfer time, contamination duration and level of contaminant concentration. All three factors can be plotted on a “vulnerability cube” edges to help in the estimation of overall vulnerability. Such a groundwater vulnerability assessment methodology was applied at the site of the Tisovec Karst hydrogeological structure (Slovenske Rudohorie Mts., Western Carpathians — Slovakia). The potential target of contamination spreading was the groundwater table, so the final result in a map format can be called an “intrinsic groundwater resource vulnerability map” according to the “European definitions” (COST 620 project). For calculation of physically-based vulnerability parameters, the VULK software tool developed at the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland was used. Simulations conducted using VULK tool provided contamination breakthrough curve parameters of potential contaminant transfer time, contamination duration and level of potential contaminant concentration. These were logarithmically plotted on the axes of the “vulnerability cube.” Then the resulting vulnerability value V was calculated as the distance from the “zero point” of the “vulnerability cube.” Results were used also as the first estimate of potential groundwater vulnerability influencing factors based on field data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, & J.H., Petty, R.J. 1985: DRASTIC: A standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrologic settings. U.S. EPA, Robert, S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, OK, EPA/600/2-85/0108, 163 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouyére, S., Jeannin, P.-Y., Dassargues, A., Goldscheider, N., Popescu, C., Sauter, M., Vadillo, I., & Zwahlen, F., 2001: Evaluation and validation of vulnerability concepts using a physically based approach. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besnacon 20–22 Sep. 2001, Sci. Tech. Envir., Mém. H.S. No. 13, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornaton, F. & Perrochet, P. 2001: Notes concerning the experimental program VULK. Manuscript, archive of the CHYN Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 5 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, D., Dassargues, A., Drew, D., Dunne, S., Goldscheider, N., Neale, S., Popescu, Ch., & Zwahlen, F. 2002: Main concepts of the “European Approach” for karst groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeology Journal (2002) 10, 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerfliger, N., & Zwahlen, F. 1998: Groundwater vulnerability mapping in Karstic regions (EPIK). Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, VU 2504 E, Berne, 56 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S.S.D. 1987: Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater Pollutants, TNO Committee on Hydro-geological Research, The Hague, Proceedings and Information No. 38, 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölting, B., Haertlé, T., Hohberger, K.H., Nachtigall, K.H., Villinger, E., Weinzierl, W., & Wrobel, J.P. 1995: Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktionen der Grundwasserüberdeckung. Geol. Jb., C 63, pp. 5–24, Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannin, P.-Y., Cornaton, F., Zwahlen, F., & Perrochet, P., 2001: VULK: a tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besnacon 20–22 Sep. 2001, Sci. Tech. Envir., Mém. H.S. No. 13, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.S. 1989: SEEPAGE: a system for early evaluation of the pollution potential of agricultural ground water environments. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Geology Technical Note 5 (revision 1), 23 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort, D., Evert, L., & Waaenaar, I. 1993: Aquifer Vulnerability Index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Canadian Water Resources Journal 18, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, J., & Zaporozec, A. 1994: Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, International Association of Hydrogeologists Revue, vol. 16, 1994, Verlag Heinz Heise, Hannover, 131 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwahlen, F. (ed.) et al. 2004: Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. COST Action 620 Final Report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2004 — XVIII, 297 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Malik, P., Vojtkova, S. (2009). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Physical Principles of Contamination Spreading. In: Illangasekare, T.H., Mahutova, K., Barich, J.J. (eds) Decision Support for Natural Disasters and Intentional Threats to Water Security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2713-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics