Several methods of groundwater vulnerability assessment have been developed since 1970s in order to derive vulnerability maps, taking account of hydrogeological settings and field investigations. Majority of those relied on counting of points related to various hydrogeological factors with different, mostly subjective rating. More physical understanding to this topic was added by Brouyére et al. (2001) and Jeannin et al. (2001). Such definitions of groundwater vulnerability are based on contamination spreading principles. As the contamination evolves in the groundwater, it is affected by different intrinsic hydrodynamic and hydrodispersive mechanisms, altering progressively its spatial and temporal distribution. Main intrinsic hydrodispersive processes in underground are advection, hydrodynamic dispersion, physical retardation and dilution. For intrinsic groundwater vulnerability, three factors describing pollution by conservative contaminant are defined: contaminant transfer time, contamination duration and level of contaminant concentration. All three factors can be plotted on a “vulnerability cube” edges to help in the estimation of overall vulnerability. Such a groundwater vulnerability assessment methodology was applied at the site of the Tisovec Karst hydrogeological structure (Slovenske Rudohorie Mts., Western Carpathians — Slovakia). The potential target of contamination spreading was the groundwater table, so the final result in a map format can be called an “intrinsic groundwater resource vulnerability map” according to the “European definitions” (COST 620 project). For calculation of physically-based vulnerability parameters, the VULK software tool developed at the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland was used. Simulations conducted using VULK tool provided contamination breakthrough curve parameters of potential contaminant transfer time, contamination duration and level of potential contaminant concentration. These were logarithmically plotted on the axes of the “vulnerability cube.” Then the resulting vulnerability value V was calculated as the distance from the “zero point” of the “vulnerability cube.” Results were used also as the first estimate of potential groundwater vulnerability influencing factors based on field data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, & J.H., Petty, R.J. 1985: DRASTIC: A standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrologic settings. U.S. EPA, Robert, S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, OK, EPA/600/2-85/0108, 163 p.
Brouyére, S., Jeannin, P.-Y., Dassargues, A., Goldscheider, N., Popescu, C., Sauter, M., Vadillo, I., & Zwahlen, F., 2001: Evaluation and validation of vulnerability concepts using a physically based approach. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besnacon 20–22 Sep. 2001, Sci. Tech. Envir., Mém. H.S. No. 13, 67–72.
Cornaton, F. & Perrochet, P. 2001: Notes concerning the experimental program VULK. Manuscript, archive of the CHYN Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 5 p.
Daly, D., Dassargues, A., Drew, D., Dunne, S., Goldscheider, N., Neale, S., Popescu, Ch., & Zwahlen, F. 2002: Main concepts of the “European Approach” for karst groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeology Journal (2002) 10, 340–345.
Doerfliger, N., & Zwahlen, F. 1998: Groundwater vulnerability mapping in Karstic regions (EPIK). Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, VU 2504 E, Berne, 56 p.
Foster, S.S.D. 1987: Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater Pollutants, TNO Committee on Hydro-geological Research, The Hague, Proceedings and Information No. 38, 69–86.
Hölting, B., Haertlé, T., Hohberger, K.H., Nachtigall, K.H., Villinger, E., Weinzierl, W., & Wrobel, J.P. 1995: Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktionen der Grundwasserüberdeckung. Geol. Jb., C 63, pp. 5–24, Hannover.
Jeannin, P.-Y., Cornaton, F., Zwahlen, F., & Perrochet, P., 2001: VULK: a tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besnacon 20–22 Sep. 2001, Sci. Tech. Envir., Mém. H.S. No. 13, 185–190.
Moore, J.S. 1989: SEEPAGE: a system for early evaluation of the pollution potential of agricultural ground water environments. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Geology Technical Note 5 (revision 1), 23 p.
Van Stempvoort, D., Evert, L., & Waaenaar, I. 1993: Aquifer Vulnerability Index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Canadian Water Resources Journal 18, 25–37.
Vrba, J., & Zaporozec, A. 1994: Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, International Association of Hydrogeologists Revue, vol. 16, 1994, Verlag Heinz Heise, Hannover, 131 p.
Zwahlen, F. (ed.) et al. 2004: Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. COST Action 620 Final Report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2004 — XVIII, 297 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Malik, P., Vojtkova, S. (2009). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Physical Principles of Contamination Spreading. In: Illangasekare, T.H., Mahutova, K., Barich, J.J. (eds) Decision Support for Natural Disasters and Intentional Threats to Water Security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2713-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2713-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2712-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2713-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)