Skip to main content

Mechanical Destruction of Weeds: A Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

Methods of mechanical destruction of weeds in relation to their biology are reviewed. Depending on the stage of growth and type of weed, i.e. the depth at which new shoots can be formed and the ability to withstand burial, implements inflict damage on weeds in different ways: cutting, burial, uprooting. The various types of damage are shown. The three main methods of destruction are analysed and compared. These are: lethal damage, particularly effective in the case of plantlets; the exhaustion of reserves, effective where either deep or surface organs are targeted; withering, of special interest where sub-surface parts should be involved. Stored reserves can be depleted by either cutting the foliage, burying foliar parts or severely cutting up surface organs of propagation. Withering is accomplished by either cutting the roots, by exposing the roots to the air or by shaking out rootlets. It is shown that the kind of damage is strongly dependent upon the type of organ involved. Advances in our understanding of the way in which mortality occurs are discussed in the light of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anonymous. (1968) Weed control. Principles of plant and animal pest control, Vol. 2. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 471 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arny A.C. (1927) Successful eradication of perennial weeds. Report of the Ontario Agriculture and Experimental Union for 1926, pp. 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arny A.C. (1932) Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November. Minn. State Tech. Bull. 84, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr C.G. (1940) Organic reserves in the roots of bindweed. J. Agric. Res. 60, 391–413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdot G.W. (1984) Regeneration of yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) rhizome fragments of different lengths from various depths in the soil. Weed Res. 24, 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J.W., Murray D.S. (1982) Growth and development of Silverleaf Nightshade Solanum eleagnifolium. Weed Sci. 30, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley W.E. (1920) Weeds of farm land. Longman, Green and Co., London, 239 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman P. (1855) On agricultural weeds. J. Roy. Agric. Soc. England XVI, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor R.J. (1968) The value of biological studies in weed control. Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf. 3, 1129–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicouene D. (1991) Les mauvaises herbes des champs de grandes cultures: inventaire, biologie, écologie, dynamique des infestations en Bretagne, Thèse, Université de Rennes, 148 + 64 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicouene D. (1992) Profondeur de formation des organes souterrains de propagation végétative et mode d’hivernage des mauvaises herbes pérennes en Bretagne. IXè Colloque Intern. Bio. Mauvaises Herbes. Association Nationale de Protection des Plantes, pp. 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicouene D. (1996) Typologie des périodes de levée des mauvaises herbes à partir d’organes végétatifs sous climat tempéré océanique. Xè Colloque Intern. Bio. Mauvaises Herbes. Association Nationale de Protection des Plantes, pp. 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicouene D. (1999) Déchaumage mécanique: prise en compte de la biologie des mauvaises herbes. Phytoma-la défense des végétaux 519, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derscheid L.A., Nash R.L., Wicks G.A. (1961) Thistle control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weeds 9(1) 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drottij S. (1929) Harrowing to control weeds in cereals. Meddel. Centralanst. Forsoksv. Jordbrusomradet 348, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans S.A. (1962) Weed destruction, a farmers’ and students’ guide. Blackwell, Oxford, 172 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fail H. (1956) The effects of rotary cultivation on the rhizomatous weeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1958) Méthodes de désherbage. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture, Rome, 208 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1988) La lutte raisonnée contre les mauvaises herbes. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture, Rome, 159 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer J.D., Evans S.A. (1970) Weed control handbook, Volume 1, Principles, 5th ed. Blackwell, Oxford, 494 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grummer G. (1963) Das Verhalten von Rhizomen der Quecke (Agropyron repens) gegen trockene Luft. Weed Res. 3, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1967) Experiments with Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and response to burial at different developmental stages. Lantbr. högsk. Annlr. 33, 823–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1969) Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and defoliation in different developmental stages. Lantbr. högsk. Annlr. 35, 989–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1975) Perennial grass weeds in Europe. Symp. Status, Bio. Cont. Grassweeds Eur. 2, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1982) Multiplication, growth and persistence of perennial weeds – in biology and ecology of weeds. Dr W. Junk Publishers, the Hague, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S., Wallgren B. (1975) The control of rhizomatous grass weeds by soil cultivation in late summer and autumn under Swedish conditions. Symp. Status, Bio. and Cont. Grassweeds Eur. 2, 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock A.S., Clothier G.L. (1898) Vegetative propagation of perennial weeds. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 76, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogdson J.M. (1972) The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4 D, Amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18, 253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilnicki R.D., Fertig S.N. (1962) Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast. 3- Horse Nettle. Northeast Regional Publication, Agricultural Experiement Station, University of Rhode Island, 54 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmisch T. (1857) Ueber die Keimung und die Erneuerungsweise von Convolvulus sepium und C. arvensis, so wie über hypokotylische Adventivknospen bei krautartigen phanerogamen Pflanzen. Bot. Zeit. 15(26) Juni, 433–443, 449–462, 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P.A., Blair A.M., Orson J.H. (1995) The effect of different types of physical damage to four weeds species. Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, Brighton, pp. 653–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P.A., Blair A.M., Orson J.H. (1996) Mechanical damage to kill weeds. Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, pp. 949–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • King L.J. (1966) Weeds of the world, biology and control. Hill, London, 526 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingman G.C. (1961) Weed control as a science. Wiley, New York, 421 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsmo E. (1930) Unkrauter im Ackerbau der Neuzeit. Biologische und practische Untersuchungen. J. Springer, Berlin, 580 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey R.R.B. (1981) Adaptative biology of vegetatively regenerating weeds. Adv. Appl. Biol., 6, 57–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson M.U., Wyse D.L., Spitzmueller J.M. (1987) Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) propagation from stem sections. Weed Sci. 35, 637–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann H., Cavers P.B. (1979) The regenerative capacity of root cuttings of Taraxacum officinale under natural conditions. Can. J. Bot. 57, 1783–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muencher W.C. (1955) Weeds, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York, 560 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzic T.J. (1970) Weed biology and control. McGraw-Hill, New York, 273 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palis E. (1996) Les travaux mécaniques du sol post-moisson et la dynamique des rhizomes d’Elymus repens (L.) Gould dans la culture des pommes de terre. Xe colloque International sur la Biologie des mauvaises herbes, Dijon, 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlychenko T.K., Kirk L.E., Kossar W. (1940) Eradication of perennial weeds by the shallow cultivation method. Bull. Univ. Saskatchewan Coll. Agric. 100, pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss A.N. (1889) On root propagation of Canada thistle. Cornell Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 15, 190–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J. (1992) Testing harrows for mechanical control of annual weeds in agricultural crops. Weed Res. 32, 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J. (1996) Mechanical weed management. Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, pp. 943–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins W.W., Crafts A.S., Raynor R.N. (1942) Weed control, a textbook and manual. McGraw-Hill, New York, 542 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury S.E. (1962) The biology of garden weeds. Vincent Square, London, 50 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely C.I. (1952) Controlling perennial weeds with tillage. Idaho Agr. Exp. Stat. Bull. 288, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons F.L. (1941) Results of bindweed control experiments at the Fort Hays Branch Station. Kansas Agr. Expt. State Bull. 296, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton F.A., Morris V.H., Hartzler A.J. (1929) Organic food reserves in relation to the eradication of Canada thistle. Ohio Agr. Expt. State Bull. 441, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl R.L. (1993) Fundamentals of weed science. Academic, San Diego, CA, 450 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the following for their comments: Laurent Beillard (Laboratoire d’Ecologie et Sciences Phytosanitaires, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Rennes, France), Hervé Daniel (Institut National d’Horticulture, Angers, France), Jacques Maillet (Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, France), Daniel Cloutier (Institut de Malherbologie, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec) and Christian Boulet (Université de Nantes, Nantes, France); and G. B. Wakefield for advice in preparing the text in English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Chicouene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chicouene, D. (2009). Mechanical Destruction of Weeds: A Review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics