Skip to main content

Recent Developments in the Field of Educational Leadership: The Challenge of Complexity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Educational Change

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 23))

Abstract

In this “golden age” of school leadership (Anderson et al., 2007; Day & Leithwood, 2007) the field is faced with the fact that “new managerialism” which embraced managerial efficiency and effectiveness through bureaucracy and accountability as key levers for reforming schools has failed. It is argued that it is time that the professionals and educational leaders strive to ensure what happens now and in the future is what they want to happen (Gronn, 2003; Hargreaves & Fink, 2006; Hyman, 2005; Leadbeater, 2004a; MacBeath, 2006; Mulford, 2003a; OECD, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 789.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, the OECD (2001a) scenarios for future schools and feedback from educational leaders on the most likely and preferred scenarios in the next 5–10 years (Mulford, 2007a).

  2. 2.

    For example: http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/

References

  • Anderson, M., Gronn, P., Ingvarson, L., Jackson, A., Kleinhenz, E., McKenzie, P., et al. (2007). Australia: Country Background Report. OECD Improving School Leadership Activity. A report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, K., McCormick, J., & Conners, R. (2001). Transformational leadership in schools: Panacea, placebo or problem? Journal of Educational Administration, 39(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Mulford, B. (1999). When will they ever learn? Another failure of centrally imposed change. School Leadership and Management, 19(2), 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, P., Crawford, C., & Goodman, A. (2006). Which skills matter? London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics. http://cee.lse.ac.uk/cee%20dps/ceedp59.pdf

  • Cunha, F., Heckman, J., Lochner, J., & Masterov, D. (2005). Interpreting the evidence of life cycle skill formation. London: NBER Working Paper 11331. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11331

  • Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2005). http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/aims/ (accessed on 27/3/2006).

  • Dinham, S. (2007). Authoritative leadership, action learning and student accomplishment. ACER Research Conference 2007, ‘The Leadership Challenge: Improving learning in schools’, Melbourne, 12–14 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (2001). Cultivating leadership in school: Connecting people, purpose and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, L. (2000). The relative economic importance of academic, psychological and behavioural attributes developed in childhood. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (1999). Target setting, policy pathology and student perspectives: Learning to labour in new times. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(2), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Toronto Principals Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, G., & Shields, C. (2003, April) How can leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools? Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. (2000). Big change questions: Should pedagogical change be mandated? Dumbing down on classroom standards: The perils of a technician’s approach to pedagogy. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2007). Five minds for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R., Hoy, W., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn. P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital. Washington DC: The Word Bank, Working Paper No. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2005). Successful principal leadership: Australian case studies. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2007). Research on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership: Retrospect and prospect. ACER Research Conference 2007, ‘The Leadership Challenge: Improving learning in schools’, Melbourne, 12–14 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Original.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, P. (2005). 1 out of 10: From downing street to classroom reality. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, D., & Deloney, P. (1996). Integrating rural school and community development: An initial examination. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Rural Education Association, San Antonio, Texas, 11–14 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1994, July). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances, Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, S., Johns, S., Mulford, B., Falk, I., & Prescott, L. (2001). More than education: Leadership for rural school-community partnerships. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. http://rirdc.gov.au/reports/HCC/02-055sum.html

  • Leadbeater, C. (2004a). Learning about personalisation: How can we put the learning at the heart of the education system? London: UK Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2004b). Personalisation through participation. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2005). The shape of things to come. London: DfES Innovation Unit. http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/innovation-unit

  • Lecomte, H., & Smillie, I. (2004). Ownership and partnership: What role for civil society in poverty reduction strategies? Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (in press). Transformational school leadership. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, E. (2007). Take me to your leader: Leadership and the future. ACER Research Conference 2007, ‘The Leadership Challenge: Improving learning in schools’, Melbourne, 12–14 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2006). Leadership as a subversive activity. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Leaders Monograph No. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H., & Printy, S. (2004). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McREL. (2005). The future of schooling: Educating America in 2014. Colorado: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1978). Notes on the structure of educational organisations: Revised Version. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Reported in J. Hannaway, Administrative structures why do they grow? Teachers College Record, 79(3), 416–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2002). The global challenge: A matter of balance. Educational Management & Administration, 30(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2003a). School leaders: Challenging roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Paris: Commissioned Paper by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the Activity ‘Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers’. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/61/2635399.pdf

  • Mulford, B. (2003b). Balance and learning: Crucial elements in leadership for democratic schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2003c). Leadership in education: Losing sight of out interests? In N. Bennett, M. Crawford, & M. Cartwright (Eds.), Effective educational leadership (pp. 3–13). London: Open University Press & Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2003d). The role of school leadership in attracting and retaining teachers and promoting innovative schools and students. Canberra: Review of Teaching and Teacher Education, Commonwealth Department of Education Science and Training. http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/161EEEC9-713A-40CD-9E87-2E5ACA1E19A3/1661/leadership.pdf

  • Mulford, B. (2004). Congruence between the democratic purposes of schools and school principal training in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(6), 625–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2007a). Overview of research on Australian educational leadership 2001–2005. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Leaders Monograph No. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2007b). Successful school principalship in Tasmania. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Making a difference: Successful school leadership in eight countries. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2007c). Successful school leadership: What and who decides? Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2007d). The challenge of building social capital in professional learning communities: Importance, challenges and a way forward. In L. Stoll & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties (pp. 166–180). London: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (2008). The leadership challenge. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, Australian Education Review 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B., & Edmunds, B. (2009). Successful school principalship in Tasmania. Launceston: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania. http://fcms.its.utas.edu.au/educ/educ/

  • Mulford, B., & Edmunds, B. (2010). Educational investment in Australian schooling: Serving public purposes in Tasmanian primary schools. Launceston: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania. http://fcms.its.utas.edu.au/educ/educ/

  • Mulford, W., Silins, H., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSL. (2005a). Learning-centred leadership: Towards personalised learning-centred leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSL. (2005b). Establishing a network of schools. Cranfield: Network Learning Group, National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSL. (2005c). Emerging lessons from NCSL research activity. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSL. (2007). What we know about school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001a). New school management approaches. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, (2001b). What school for the future? Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Think scenarios, rethink education. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S. (1987). The different drum: Community making and peace. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedro, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: Paper for the OECD-CERI New Millennium Learners activity. http://oecd.org/document/56/0,2340,en_2649_35845295_38358584_1_1_1_1,00.html

  • Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on chaos. London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2007). Independent study into school leadership. London: Department of Education and Science, Project RB818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., Hogaboam, A., & Gray, P. (2004). Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes and collective teacher efficacy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, E. (2005). Institutional barriers to organisational learning in school systems: The power of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 83–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2009, April). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. Paper presented at AERA, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, J., Hager, D., & Warne, T. (2002). The paradox of professional community: Tales from two high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2002a). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.),Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 561–612). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2002b). Schools as learning organisations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. The Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2004). Schools as learning organisations: Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3–4), 443–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., Mulford, B., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organisational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: An investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 341–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., et al. (2006). Professional learning communities: Source materials for school leaders and other leaders of professional learning. London: Department of Education and Skills, Innovations Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Fink, D., & Earl, L. (2003). It’s about learning: And it’s about time. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen, W. (2003). A new force for change: Homo Zappiens. The Learning Citizen, 7(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (2005). Finding our way: Leadership for an uncertain time. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehl.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Expanding opportunities and building competencies for young people: A new agenda for secondary education. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill Mulford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulford, B. (2010). Recent Developments in the Field of Educational Leadership: The Challenge of Complexity. In: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., Hopkins, D. (eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Change. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics