Skip to main content

An Evaluation of the Impact of the Natural Forest Protection Programme on Rural Household Livelihoods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Integrated Assessment of China's Ecological Restoration Programs

Abstract

In this chapter, we estimate the impact on local household livelihoods of the Natural Forest Protection Programme (NFPP), which is the largest logging ban programme in the world, and aims to protect watersheds and conserve natural forests. In doing so we use a series of micro-econometric techniques for policy evaluation to assess the impacts of the NFPP on two interrelated facets of household livelihoods, namely income and off farm labour supply. We find that the NFPP has had a negative impact on incomes from timber harvesting but has actually had a positive impact on total household incomes from all sources. Further, we find that off farm labour supply has increased more rapidly in NFPP areas than non-NFPP areas. This result is strongest for employment outside the village. On the basis of these results, policy implications for household livelihoods are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1In fact, only the assumption that Y0⊥ D|X is necessary to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated using matching techniques.

  2. 2.

    All estimation is carried out in STATA 9. The matching estimates use an Epanechnikov kernel for the kernel matching process, and a bandwidth of 0.1 for both the kernel and local linear matching. Alternative matching specifications were also estimated to assess robustness, and these did not significantly affect the results. The PSW procedure was carried out by weighting each observation by the propensity score, and then calculating the average of these weighted estimates. The standard errors for the PSM and PSW methods are estimated using bootstrapping with 500 repetitions. Lastly, all the models were estimated only within the region of common support.

References

  • Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. (1978). Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., & Card, D. (1985). Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Costa Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation methods for non-experimental data. Fiscal Studies, 21(4), 427–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M. and S. Kopeinig (2008). “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1): 31–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Xiang, C., Liu, X. & Mu, K., 2001. Case Study on the Natural Forest Protection Program in Sichuan Province's Li County, Pingwu County and Chuanxi Forestry Bureau, CCICED Western China Forest and Grasslands Taskforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H. and S. Wahba (2002). “Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies.’ Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1): 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demurger, S., & Fournier, M. (2003, August 28–29). Forest protection and rural economic welfare: The case of Labagoumen nature reserve (China). Fourth Bioecon Workshop on the Economics of Biodiversity Conservation, Economic Analysis of Policies for Biodiversity Conservation, Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, P. J. (2002). The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 43(2–3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R. & Todaro, M.P., 1970. Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., & Robb, R. (1984). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. In J. Heckman & B. Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data. (pp. 156–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, K., G. W. Imbens and G. Ridder (2003). “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score.’ Econometrica 71(4): 1161–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, R., Polasky, S., & Tschirhart J. (1998). Takings, compensation and endangered species protection on private lands. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsigris, E. (2002). Local-level socioeconomic impacts of the Natural Forest Protection Program. In J. Xu, E. Katsigris, & T. A. White (Eds.) Implementing the natural forest protection program and the sloping lands conversion program. Western China Forests and Grassland Taskforce of China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsigris, E., Bull, G. Q., White, A., Barr, C., Barney, K., Bun, Y., Kahrl, F., King, T., Lankin, A. & Lebedev, A. (2004). The China forest products trade: Overview of Asia-Pacific supplying countries, impacts and implications. The International Forestry Review, 6(Part 3/4), 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (1996). Slowing tropical forest biodiversity losses: Cost and compensation considerations. Workshop on Biodiversity Loss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao, G. & West, R. A. (2004). Chinese collective forestlands: contributions and constraints. International Forestry Review, 6(3/4), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1979). Intersectoral factor mobility and agricultural growth. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R. E. (1972). A new approach to estimating switching regressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. D. (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S., Huang, J., Husain, S. A., & Zazueta, A. (2000). China: From afforestation to poverty alleviation and natural forest management. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, 6(1), 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, M. (2001). How the logging ban affects community forest management: Aba prefecture, North Sichuan, China. Policy frameworks for enabling successful community-based resource management initiatives, East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I., Squire, L., & Strauss, J. (1986). Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications, and policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjastaad, L. A. (1962). The cost and returns of human migration. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T., Zhang, S., Kontoleon, A., Mullan, K. & Ng, S. W., 2006. Assessing the impacts of the Natural Forest Protection Programme on local community welfare, CCICED Task Force on Environmental and Natural Resources Pricing and Taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M.P., 1969. A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries. American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Han, H. & Bennett, J., 2008. China's Land Use Management. In J. Bennett, X. Wang, & L. Zhang, eds. Environmental Protection in China: Land Use Management. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyerhaeuser, H., Wen, S. & Kahrl, F. (2006). Emerging forest associations in Yunnan, China: Implications for livelihoods and sustainability. Kunming, Yunnan: International Institute for Environment Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Katsigris, E., & White, T. A., Eds. (2002) Implementing the natural forest protection program and the sloping lands conversion program. Western China Forests and Grassland Taskforce of China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2001). Impacts and effectiveness of logging bans in natural forests: People's Republic of China. In P. B. Durst, T. R. Waggener, T. Enters, & T. L. Cheng (Eds.) Forests out of bounds: Impacts and effectiveness of logging bans in natural forests in Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: FAO Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P., Shao, G., Zhao, G., Le Master, D., Parker, G., Dunning, J. & Li, Q. (2000). China's forest policy for the 21st century. Science, 288(5474), 2135–2136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, T. (2002). Implementation of the NFPP. In J. Xu, E. Katsigris, & T. A. White, Eds. (2002) Implementing the natural forest protection program and the sloping lands conversion program. Western China Forests and Grassland Taskforce of China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development as well as the assistance of the School of Environmental Sciences of Beijing University in implementing the survey used in this chapter and particularly the help received by Ms. Tao Wendi. We are also grateful for the comments received by Prof. Jeff Bennett, Prof. Erwin Bulte, Dr. Ben Groom, Dr. Shinwei Ng, Prof. David Pearce, Prof. Jerry Warford, and Prof. Jintao Xu. We are also grateful for the comments received from the participants of the International Symposium on Evaluating China's Ecological Restoration Programs (hosted by the Forest Economics and Development Research Center of China's State Forestry Administration and Michigan State University in Beijing Oct 18–20) and in particular Prof. Runsheng Yin, Dr. Emi Uchida, Prof. David Newman and Prof. Bill Hyde.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrina Mullan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mullan, K., Kontoleon, A., Swanson, T., Zhang, S. (2009). An Evaluation of the Impact of the Natural Forest Protection Programme on Rural Household Livelihoods. In: Yin, R. (eds) An Integrated Assessment of China's Ecological Restoration Programs. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2655-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics