Skip to main content

Attention in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science

Abstrct

Many figures in phenomenology, including founder Edmund Husserl, have uniquely addressed what cognitive scientists call attention. For example, Husserl (1991) discussed dynamic temporal attention, attentional shifting (1970), attentional capture (1982), and serial attention (2001). Jean-Paul Sartre (1956), Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1962), and Aron Gurwitsch (1964, 1966) discussed attention in terms of gestalt principles, including the nature of visual search, illusions, salience, and context effects, often criticizing various psychological concepts of attention. But for each of these phenomenologists the context or margin in attending was the main interest not the focus of attention. In contrast, experimental attention research emphasizes the focus of attention. Things are changing. Phenomenologists still emphasize context and margin, but now cognitive scientists are starting to as well. This means that the theoretical trends in contemporary attention experiments and a century of phenomenology of the structures of consciousness and perception, can both be used to put attention in context. This chapter shows that current cognitive science of attention substantially intersects with a gestalt-phenomenology of attention, even if this intersection is not yet effectively articulated by phenomenologists or utilized by experimenters in formulating hypotheses, models, and theories. It also suggests that phenomenology and cognitive science of attention can be co-revelatory in theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arndt J, Cook A, Greenberg J (2002) Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs: exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. J Exp Psychol Gen 131:307-324

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (1992) On the origins of organization in consciousness. J Br Soc Phenomenol 23:53-65

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (1996) Toward a phenomenology of attention. Human Studies 19:71-84

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (1997) Looking intuit: A phenomenological analysis of intuition and attention. In: Robbie D-F, Sven AP (eds) Intuition: the inside story: interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 39-56

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (1998) Bringing context into focus: parallels in the psychology of attention and the philosophy of science. J Phenomenol Psychol 29:50-91

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (2000) Transformations in consciousness: continuity, the self and marginal consciousness. J Conscious Stud 7:3-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (2003) A lexicon of attention: from cognitive science to phenomenology. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 2:99-131

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (2004) Experimental evidence for three dimensions of attention. In: Lester E (ed) Gurwitsch’s relevancy for cognitive science. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (2006) The sphere of attention: context and margin. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson PS (2008) Attentional capture and attentional character. J Phenomenol Cogn Sci 7:539-562

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars BJ (2003) How brain reveals mind: neural studies support the fundamental role of conscious experience. In: Anthony J, Andreas R (eds) Trusting the subject. Imprint Academic, Exeter, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes R, Jones MR (2000) Expectancy, attention, and time. Cogn Psychol 41:254-311

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastick T (1982) Intuition: how we think and act. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker MW, Pashler H (2005) Awareness of the continuously visible: information acquisition during preview. Percept Psychophys 67:1391-1403

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian Z, Braunstein ML, Andersen GJ (2006) The ground dominance effect in the perception of relative distance in 3-D scenes is mainly due to characteristics of the ground surface. Percept Psychophys 68:1297-1309

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I (1972) Perceiving real world scenes. Science 177:77-80

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick M, Plaut DC (2002) Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action. Psychol Res 66:298-311

    Google Scholar 

  • Braver T, Barch DM, Keys BA, Carter CS, Cohen JD, Kaye JA, Janowsky JS, Taylor SF, Yesavage JA, Mumenthaler MS, Jagust WJ, Reed BR (2001) Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:746-763

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo MJ, Farid H (2006) Object recognition in dense clutter. Percept Psychophys 68:911-918

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin CR (1989) Cognitive change processes in psychotherapy. Psychol Rev 96:379-394

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Vousden JI, McCormack T (1999) The development of memory for serial order: a temporal-contextual distinctiveness model. Int J Psychol 34:389-402

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzina R (2004) Phenomenology and cognitive science: moving beyond the paradigms. Husserl Stud 20:43-88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülthoff H, van Veen H (2001) Vision and action in virtual environments: modern psychophysics in spatial cognition research. In: Jenkin M, Harris L (eds) Vision and attention. Springer, New York, pp 233-252

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh P, Labianca AT, Thornton IM (2001) Attention-based visual routines: sprites. Cognition 80:47-60

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong SC, Treisman A (2005) Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Percept Psychophys 67:1-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun MM, Jiang Y (1998) Contextual cuing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn Psychol 36:28-71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun MM, Jiang Y (1999) Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychol Sci 10:360-365

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun MM, Jiang Y (2003) Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:224-234

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RC (1999) Developing technical training. ISPI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen RA (1993) The neuropsychology of attention. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull JT (1998) Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 55:343-361

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton P, Lavie N (2004) Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:180-193

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport J, Potter MC (2004) Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci 15:559-564

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (2007) Heterophenomenology reconsidered. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:247-270

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo V, Smilek D, Kawahara J-I, Ghorashi SMS (2005) System reconfiguration, not resource depletion, determines efficiency of visual search. Percept Psychophys 67:1080-1087

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing P, Liu J, Kanwisher N (2001) Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia 39:1329-1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Embree L (ed) (2004). Preface. In: Gurwitsch’s relevancy for cognitive science. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RW, Tuholski SW, Laughlin J, Conway ARA (1999) Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 128:309-331

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, Schultz DW (1979) Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys 25:249-263

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, St. James JD (1986) Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention. Percept Psychophys 40:225-240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fileteo JV, Freidrich FJ, Stricker JL (2001) Shifting attention to different levels within global-local stimuli: a study of normal participants and a patient with temporal-parietal lobe damage. Cogn Neuropsychol 18:227-261

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner MA, Slotnick SD, Moo LR, Caramazza A (2007) Involuntary capture of attention produces domain-specific activation. NeuroReport 18:975-979

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:1030-1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk CL, Remington RW (1998) Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:847-858

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey H-P, König P, Einhäuser W (2007) The role of first- and second-order stimulus features for human overt attention. Percept Psychophys 69:153-161

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson BS, Kelsey EM (1998) Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for display-wide visual features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:699-706

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Dixon P (2001) The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Can J Exp Psychol 55:96-103

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman CV, Intraub H (2002) Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perform 28:1-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch A (1964) The field of consciousness. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch A (1966) Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch A (1985) The phenomenology of signals and significations. In: Lester E (ed) Marginal consciousness. Ohio University Press, Athens, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan C, Vergeer I (2001) Multiple uses of mental imagery by professional modern dancers. Imag Cogn Pers 20:231-255

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood J (1998) A rdzogs-chen Buddhist interpretation of the sense of self. J Conscious Stud 5:611-626

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (1999) High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 50:243-271

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (2003) Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Percept Psychophys 65:58-71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz I, Orbach Y, Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Horowitz D (2001) The effect of mental context reinstatement on children’s accounts of sexual abuse. Appl Cogn Psychol 15:235-248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JL, Marsh RL, Cook GI (2005) An observation on the role of context variability in free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:1160-1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland RW, Hendriks M, Aarts H (2005) Smells like clean spirit: nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychol Sci 16:689-693

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth A (2005) The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:396-411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth A, Hyun J-S, Zhang W (2005) The role of visual short-term memory in empty cell localization. Percept Psychophys 67:1332-1343

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel BK, Ridderinkhof R, Theeuwes J (2002) Cognitive control of attention and action: issues and trends. Psychol Res 66:215-219

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz TS, Klieger SB, Fencsik DE, Yang KK, Alvarez GA, Wolfe JM (2007) Tracking unique objects. Percept Psychophys 69:172-184

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations, vols. 1 and 2 (trans: John. N. Findlay). Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book. General introduction to a pure phenomenology (trans: Fred Kersten). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1991) On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time 1893-1917 (trans: John Barnett Brough). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (2001) Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: lectures on transcendental logic (trans: Anthony Steinbock). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Intraub H, Hoffman JE, Wetherhold JC, Stoehs S-A (2006) More than meets the eye: the effect of planned fixations on scene representation. Percept Psychophys 68:759-769

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin DE, Zelinsky GH (2002) Eye movements and scene perception: memory for things observed. Percept Psychophys 64:882-895

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson NS, Dobson KS, Traux PA, Addis ME, Koerner K, Gollan JK, Gortner E, Prince SE (1996) A competent analysis of cognitive-behavioural treatment for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 64:295-304

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1981) Principles of psychology, vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jescheniak JD, Hantsch A, Schriefers H (2005) Context effects on lexical choice and lexical activation. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 31:905-920

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Chun MM (2003) Contextual cuing: reciprocal influences between attention and implicit learning. In: Luis J (ed) Attention and implicit learning. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 277-296

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MR, McAuley JD (2005) Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Percept Psychophys 67:398-417

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambe G, Rayner K, Duffy SA (2001) Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous worlds: evidence from eye fixations. Mem Cogn 29:363-372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher N (2001) Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition 79:89-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Case P, Holroyd T, Horvath E, Raczaszek J, Tuller B, Ding M (1995) Multistability and metastability in perceptual and brain dynamics. In: Kruse P, Stadler M (eds) Ambiguity in mind and nature. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelter S, Kaup B, Claus B (2004) Representing a described sequence of events: a dynamic view of narrative comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:451-464

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch C, Crick F (1994) Some further ideas regarding the neuronal basis of awareness. In: Koch C, Davis JL (eds) Large scale neuronal theories of the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 93-110

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka K (1925) Psychologie. In: Dessoir M (ed) Lehrbuch der Philosophie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzendorf R, Hartmann E, Thomas L, Berensen L (2000) Emotionally directing visual sensations: I. Generating images that contextualize emotion and become “symbolic.” Imag Cogn Pers 19:269-278

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge D (2002) Attentional control: brief and prolonged. Psychol Res 66:220-223

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamy D, Segal H, Ruderman L (2006) Grouping does not require attention. Percept Psychophys 68:17-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappin JS, Shelton AL, Rieser JJ (2006) Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. Percept Psychophys 68:571-581

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Kirsner K (2000) Knowledge partitioning: context-dependent use of expertise. Mem Cogn 28:295-305

    Google Scholar 

  • Libera CD, Chelazzi L (2006) Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychol Sci 17:222-227

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman LG, Sucharski IL, Bennington K (2001) Contextual connections to puns in fables: perceived humor. J Gen Psychol 128:157-169

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor JN, Ormerod TC, Chronicle EP (2001) Information processing and insight: a process model of performance of the nine-dot and related problems. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:176-201

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod AK, Salaminiou E (2001) Reduced positive future-thinking in depression: cognitive and effective factors. Cogn Emotion 15:99-107

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg KJ, Shiffrin RM (2005) The ‘one-shot’ hypothesis for context storage. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:322-336

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel DR (2003) Counterfactuals, emotions, and context. Cogn Emotion 17:139-159

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino AC, Scholl BJ (2005) The role of closure in defining ‘objects’ of object-based attention. Percept Psychophys 67:1140-1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh E, Edelman G, Bower GH (2001) Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory. Mem Cogn 29:798-805

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley JD, Jones MR (2003) Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short interval timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:1102-1125

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara DS, McDaniel M (2004) Suppressing irrelevant information: knowledge activation or inhibition? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:465-482

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendolia M, Moore J, Tesser A (1996) Dispositional and situational determinants of repression. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:856-867

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). The Humanities Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger T (2003) Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 2:353-393

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JO (1991) The Flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions. Percept Psychophys 49:270-288

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez ML (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933-938

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JL, Meyer AS (2005) Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:428-442

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou W, Zhang K, McNamara TP (2004) Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:171-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9:441-474

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Pointer L (2003) Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:42-52

    Google Scholar 

  • Newstead SE, Coventry KR (2000) The role of context and functionality in the interpretation of quantifiers. Eur J Cogn Psychol 12:243-259

    Google Scholar 

  • Noles NS, Scholl BJ, Mitroff SR (2005) The persistence of object file representations. Percept Psychophys 67:324-334

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer K (2002) Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 28:411-421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohman A, Flykt A, Esteves F (2001) Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:466-478

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson I, Chun MM (2001) Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:1299-1313

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson I, Marshuetz C (2005) Remembering “what” brings along “where” in visual working memory. Percept Psychophys 67:185-194

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S (1999) Vision science: from photons to phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasto L, Burack JA (2002) Visual filtering and focusing among persons with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and no psychiatric history. Can J Behav Sci 34:239-249

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MA, Enns JT (2005) The edge complex: implicit memory for figure assignment in shape perception. Percept Psychophys 67:727-740

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner M (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner M (1995) Attention in cognitive neuroscience: an overview. In: Michael G (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 625-648

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (2001) Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 80:127-158

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (2003) Seeing and visualizing: it’s not what you think. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PC, Bhatt RS (2005) Good continuation affects discrimination of visual pattern information in young infants. Percept Psychophys 67:1171-1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafal R, Henik A (1994) The neurobiology of inhibition: integrating controlled and automatic processes. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raidl M-H, Lubart TI (2001) An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imag Cogn Pers 20:217-230

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschenberger R, Yantis S (2001) Attentional capture by globally defined objects. Percept Psychophys 63:1250-1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson K, Kintsch W (2002) How does background information improve memory for text content. Mem Cogn 30:768-778

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees G, Lavie NN (2001) What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness. Neuropsychologia 39:1343-1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensink RA (2000) The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cogn 7:17-42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat P (ed) (1999) Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Roney CJR, Trick LM (2003) Grouping and gambling: a gestalt approach to understanding the gambler’s fallacy. Can J Exp Psychol 57:69-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle RA, Lessels S (2006) For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement, but not a rich visual scene. Psychol Sci 17:460-465

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell PA (2000) The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context. Am J Psychol 113:27-42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre J-P (1956) Being and nothingness (trans: Hazel Barnes). Philosophical Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl BJ, Pylyshyn ZW (1999) Tracking multiple items through occlusions: clues to visual objecthood. Cogn Psychol 38:259-290

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl B, Pylyshyn ZW, Feldman J (2001) What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition 80:159-177

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl B (2001) Objects and attention: the state of the art. Cognition 80:1-46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears CR, Pylyshyn Z (2000) Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. Can J Psychol 54:1-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharps M, Martin SS (2002) “Mindless” decision making as a failure of contextual reasoning. J Psychol 136:272-282

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons D, Mitroff SR (2001) The role of expectations in change detection and attentional capture. In: Michael J, Laurence H (eds) Vision and attention. Springer, New York, pp 189-207

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons D, Wang RF, Roddenberry D (2002) Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information. Percept Psychophys 64:521-530

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Benton S, Spalek T (2001) Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:1289-1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube-Schiff M, Segalowitz N (2005) Linguistic attention control: attention shifting governed by grammaticized elements of language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:508-519

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry WS, Burns JS (2001) Anxiety and repression in attention and retention. J Gen Psychol 128:422-432

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes J (1991) Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 50:184-193

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes J (1994) Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:799-806

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes J (2004) Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychon Bull Rev 11:65-70

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes J, Chen CYD (2005) Attentional capture and inhibition (of return: the effect on perceptual sensitivity. Percept Psychophys 67:1305-1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay S, Vachon F, Jones D (2005) Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Percept Psychophys 67:195-208

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer AK, Craik FIM (2000) The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Can J Exp Psychol 54:161-170

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ, Thompson ET, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F (1999) Present time consciousness. J Conscious Stud 6:405-428

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecera SP, Flevaris AV, Filapek JC (2004) Exogenous spatial attention influences figure-ground assignment. Psychol Sci 15:20-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace BA (1999) The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: methods for refining and examining consciousness. J Conscious Stud 6:175-187

    Google Scholar 

  • Waszak F, Drewing K, Mausfeld R (2005) Viewer-external frames of reference in the mental transformation of 3-D objects. Percept Psychophys 67:1269-1279

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins E, Teasdale JD, Williams RM (2003) Contextual questions prevent mood primes from maintaining experimentally induced dysphoria. Cogn Emotion 17:455-475

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson DG, Humphreys GW (1997) Visual marking in moving displays: feature-based inhibition in not necessary. Percept Psychophys 63:74-84

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson DG, Humphreys GW (2005) Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search. Percept Psychophys 67:418-434

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer M (1921) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I. Psychologische Forschung 1:47-58

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamon A, Valentine E, Valentine J (2002) Shifting the focus of attention between levels of musical structure. Eur J Cogn Psychol 14:493-520

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen JB, Wood VV (2001) A disruptive effect of bizarreness on memory for relational and contextual details of self-performed and other performed acts. Am J Psychol 114:535-546

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L-X, Lewandowsky S (2003) Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:663-679

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis S (1993) Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2:156-161

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky GJ, Loschky LC (2005) Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Percept Psychophys 67:676-690

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA, Madden CJ (2004) Updating situations models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:283-288

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA, Radvansky GA (1998) Situation models in language and memory. Psychol Bull 123:162-185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arvidson, P.S. (2010). Attention in Context. In: Schmicking, D., Gallagher, S. (eds) Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics