Abstract
The basic argument of this chapter, and more generally of this volume, is that it is possible to have a non-reductionist science of the embodied mind that is superior in many ways to any reductionist science that uses only “indirect routes” to, and often fails to arrive at experience. More specifically, in recent years, arguments have been put forward that we can pursue this non-reductionist science to the extent that phenomenology, or alternative introspective methods that can provide access to a methodologically controlled description of first-person experience, can be employed in experimental science (Frith 2002; Gallagher 2002, 2003; Gallagher and Overgaard 2005; Gallagher and Sørensen 2006; Jack and Roepstorff 2002; Schooler 2002; Varela and Shear 1999; also see especially the papers collected in the two-volume Trusting the Subject, Jack and Roepstorff 2003; Roepstorff and Jack 2004). Despite this growing but cautious agreement about the importance of first-person approaches, there are still questions about precisely what these methods are and how they are to be used. There are also doubts and objections, most famously summarized by Dennett (2001): “First-person science of consciousness is a discipline with no methods, no data, no results, no future, no promise. It will remain a fantasy.” For purposes of this chapter I set aside such objections (see Noë 2007 for ongoing debates), and focus on the varieties of first-person approaches that can contribute to cognitive science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Marcel (1998) has demonstrated good reason to be cautious even about this kind of minimal procedure. Specifically, across different report modes (button push, eye blink, verbal ‘Yes’) it is possible for different reports to be generated for the very same trial.
- 2.
As is the practice throughout this volume, reference to phenomenology means the approach originating with Husserl and developed in the work of his followers.
- 3.
For more on the distinction and relation between introspection and phenomenology, see Gallagher and Zahavi (2008); Overgaard, Ramsøy and Gallagher (2008); and M. Overgaard (this volume).
- 4.
Schneider’s brain damage was extremely complex, and was studied by Goldstein between 1915 and 1930.
- 5.
There are experiments that rely on front-loading phenomenology that do employ introspective reports. Brosted Sørensen (2005), for example, following Nielsen (1963), designed an alien-hand experiment to test visual versus proprioceptive awareness of the body in bulimic patients, as evidenced by first-person reports. For the experimental design he relies on phenomenological distinctions between body image and body schema (see Gallagher and Cole 1995; Paillard 1997, 1999; Gallagher 2005), and between sense of agency and sense of ownership (Gallagher 2000a, b).
References
Chaminade T, Decety J (2002) Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. NeuroReport 13(1528):1975-1978
Dennett D (2001) The fantasy of first-person science. http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/chalmersdeb3dft.htm accessed on 25 August, 2009
Engel AK, Fries P, Singer W (2001) Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:704-716
Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage 15:596-603
Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage 18:324-333
Frith CD (2002) How can we share experiences? Trends Cogn Sci 6(9):374
Gallagher S (in press) Multiple aspects of agency. New Ideas Psychol
Gallagher S (2008) Agency, free will, and psychopathology. In: Parnas J, Kenneth S. Kendler (eds) Philosophical issues in psychiatry: natural kinds, mental taxonomy and the nature of reality. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp 286-312
Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gallagher S (2003) Phenomenology and experimental design. J Conscious Stud 10(9-10):85-99
Gallagher S (2002) Experimenting with introspection. Trends Cogn Sci 6(9):374-375
Gallagher S (2000a) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4(1):14-21
Gallagher S (2000b) Self-reference and schizophrenia: a cognitive model of immunity to error through misidentification. In: Zahavi D (ed) Exploring the self: philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp 203-239
Gallagher S (1997) Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. J Conscious Stud 4(3):195-214
Gallagher S, Cole J (1995) Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. J Mind Behav 16:369-390
Gallagher S, Overgaard M (2005) Introspections without introspeculations. In: Aydede M (ed) Pain: new essays on the nature of pain and the methodology of its study. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 277-289
Gallagher S, Sørensen JB (2006) Experimenting with phenomenology. Conscious Cogn 15(1):119-134
Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2008) The phenomenological mind. Routledge, London
Graham G, Stephens GL (1994) Mind and mine. In: Graham G, Stephens GL (eds) Philosophical psychopathology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 91-109
Husserl E (1970) Cartesian meditations (trans: Cairns D). Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague
Jack AI, Roepstroff A (2002) Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: from stimulus-response to script-report. Trends Cogn Sci 6(8):333-339
Jack AI, Roepstorff A (2003) Trusting the subject, vol 1. Imprint Academic, Exeter
Lutz A (2002) Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: a first empirical case study. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:133-167
Lutz A, Lachaux J-P, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with on-going conscious states during a simple visual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1586-1591
Le Van Quyen M, Adam C, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Baulac M, Renault B et al (1997a) Temporal patterns in human epileptic activity are modulated by perceptual discriminations. NeuroReport 8:1703-1710
Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Adam C, Varela FJ (1997b) Unstable periodic orbits in a human epileptic activity. Phys Rev E 56:3401-3411
Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Baulac M, Varela FJ (1999) Anticipating epileptic seizure in real time by a nonlinear analysis of similarity between EEG recordings. NeuroReport 10:2149-2155
Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Navarro V, Boon P, DeHave M, Adam C et al (2001a) Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings. Lancet 357:183-188
Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Navarro V, Baulac M, Varela FJ (2001b) Characterizing the neuro-dynamical changes prior to seizures. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:191-208
Le Van Quyen M, Petitmengin C (2002) Neuronal dynamics and conscious experience: an example of reciprocal causation before epileptic seizures. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:169-180
Marcel AJ (1998) Blindsight and shape perception: deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain 121:1565-1588
Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Nielsen TI (1963) Volition: a new experimental approach. Scand J Psychol 4:225-230
Noë A [ed.] (2007) Special issue on heterophenomenology. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6(1-2)
Overgaard M, Ramsøy T, Gallagher S (2008) The subjective turn: towards an integration of first-person methodologies in cognitive science. J Conscious Stud 15(5):100-120
Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image: a double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (eds) Motor control, today and tomorrow. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Academic Publishing House, Sofia, pp 197-214
Paillard J (1997) Divided body schema and body image in peripherally and centrally deafferented patients. In: Gurfinkel VS, Yu S. Levik (eds) Brain and movement. Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow, p. 141
Petitmengin-Peugeot C (1999) The intuitive experience. In: Varela F, Shear J (eds) The view from within. Imprint Academic, Exeter, pp 43-77
Price DD, Aydede M (2005) The experimental use of introspection in the scientific study of pain and its integration with third-person methodologies: the experiential-phenomenological approach. In: Aydede M (ed) Pain: new essays on the nature of pain and the methodology of its study. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 243-274
Roepstorff A, Jack A (2004) Trusting the subject, vol 2. Imprint Academic, Exeter
Roy JM, Petitot J, Pachoud B, Varela F (1999) Beyond the gap. An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In: Petitot J, Varela F, Pachoud B, Roy JM (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 1-80
Schooler JW (2002) Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 6(8):339-344
Sørensen JB (2005) The alien-hand experiment. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 4(1):73-90
Stephens GL, Graham G (2000) When self-consciousness breaks: alien voices and inserted thoughts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) Experimenting with the acting self. Cogn Neuropsychol 22(3/4):387-407
Varela F (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy to the hard problem. J Conscious Stud 3:330-350
Varela F, Shear J (eds) (1999) The view from within. Imprint Academic, Exeter
Vermersch P (1994) L’Entretien d’Explicitation. ESF, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallagher, S. (2010). Phenomenology and Non-reductionist Cognitive Science. In: Schmicking, D., Gallagher, S. (eds) Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2645-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2646-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)