Skip to main content

Genomics Metaphors and Genetic Determinism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Visions of Nature

The complexities and wonder of how the inanimate chemicals that are our genetic code give rise to the imponderables of the human spirit should keep poets and philosophers inspired for millennia

(Craig J. Venter)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ThisarticleispartoftheresearchprogramofthecentreforSociety&Genomics,fundedbytheNetherlandsGenomicsInitiative.http://www.genome.gov/10001356.

  2. 2.

    Sulston, 2002/2003, p. 24.

  3. 3.

    The human genome was officially declared complete (at least in draft form) in February 2001 with the publication of two special issues of Nature and Science, in which the two rival armies of scientists deigned to summarize the breathtaking landscape of the human genome (Davies, 2001/2002, p. xv); Cf. the comparison of seeing the ‘genome landscape’ of human chromosome 22 to ‘seeing the surface or the landscape of a new planet for the first time’ (p. 194).

  4. 4.

    Robert Cook-Deegan (1994/1995) also compares the HGP to officially ordained and coordinated efforts to survey land and coastal regions, thereby opening up the West. Yet, his favourite comparison is John Wesley Powell’s survey of the American West (p. 176).

  5. 5.

    See appendix to the Lewis and Clark map.

  6. 6.

    The map-making metaphor also applies to the so-called ‘second’ Human Genome Project, namely the Human Diversity Project, led by Luigi Luca Cavalli Sforza and resulting in a ‘genetic’ geography of mankind. Cf. The history and geography of human genes (Cavalli-Sforza, 1994).

  7. 7.

    Craig Venter for instance stated that: ‘I know from personal discussions with the President over the past several years, and his comments here this morning, that genetic discrimination has been one of his major concerns about the impact of the genomic revolution. While those who will base social decisions on genetic reductionism will be ultimately defeated by science, new laws to protect us from genetic discrimination are critical in order to maximize the medical benefits from genome discoveries’. (http://www.genome.gov/10001356)

  8. 8.

    I am concerned, as many of you are, that there are some who will want to use this new knowledge as a basis of discrimination. A CNN-Time poll this morning reported that 46% of Americans polled believe that the impact of the Human Genome Project will be negative. We must work together toward higher science literacy and the wise use of our common heritage. I know from personal discussions with the President over the past several years, and his comments here this morning, that genetic discrimination has been one of his major concerns about the impact of the genomic revolution. While those who will base social decisions on genetic reductionism will be ultimately defeated by science, new laws to protect us from genetic discrimination are critical in order to maximize the medical benefits from genome discoveries.

  9. 9.

    This difference is also indicated by the icons Collins and Venter preferably used in self-presentations: Collins seated on his motorbike or playing country music on his acoustic guitar, and Venter on his sailing yacht – icons that symbolise terrestrial and aquatic forms of mobility.

  10. 10.

    http://www.lablit.com.

  11. 11.

    In the context of literary writing, the term ‘experimental novel’ may be confusing. Usually, it refers to texts that try to go beyond established or standardized patterns of literary discourse – something like ‘beyond method’ or anything goes. Zola, of course, had something completely different in mind. He was rather thinking of a very methodical type of novel.

  12. 12.

    Although the bringing back to life of dinosaurs may seem rather improbable and farfetched, the improbability of such an endeavour decreases as the species is closer (geologically speaking) to the present. Mammoth DNA, excavated in Siberian permafrost, or the genome of the Siberian tiger may (from a purely technical point of view at least) prove less difficult to reproduce and clone. In other words, while Jurassic Park may seem somewhat too ambitious, Pleistocene Park may prove less futuristic. The idea that in the near future revivified mammoths once again will roam the sub-Arctic tundras and ice fields cannot be discarded as completely absurd.

  13. 13.

    Cf. ‘Crichton tries to address every aspect of the biotechnology craze at once, giving the book too many simultaneous plotlines to follow’ (Goldman,2007, p. 819).

  14. 14.

    ‘I wanted [the book] to be in a way analogous to the genome. The genome accumulates bits and pieces of genetic material over time. It gets viruses. They get incorporated. So I started incorporating a fair number of things … true stories that I just stick in the book.’ [http://www.michaelcrichton.net/charlierose-021907.pdf]

  15. 15.

    ‘The courts are incompetent … because they are technically illiterate’ (p. 56).

  16. 16.

    My impression is that Bellarmino represents a mixture of Craig Venter and Francis Collins.

  17. 17.

    On the ‘sociability gene’ see for instance. Nature, 395 (24 September 1998), p. 327.

  18. 18.

    Cf. for example Dupré (2004) for a philosophical version of this debate.

  19. 19.

    The 2000 press conference, rather premature and hastily contrived (Davies, 2001/2002, p. xv) was, in fact, an example of this policy.

References

  • Benford, G. (2001, November 22). Where might it lead? Scientists’ professional aims should benefit from embracing the ‘what if’ mentality of science fiction. Nature, 414, 399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B., Murphy, D. L., & Hamer, D. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C. (1865/1966). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, P. (1988). Research in genetic discrimination. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 43, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1994). The history and geography of human genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. (1999). Medical and societal consequences of the human genome project. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F., Green, E., Guttmacher, A., & Guyer, M. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research, A blueprint for the genomics era. Nature, 422, 835–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Deegan, R. (1994/1995). The gene wars. Science, politics and the human genome. New York/London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (1990/1991). Jurassic park. London: Arrow/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (1995/2002). The lost world. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2006). Next. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K. (2001/2002). Cracking the genome. Inside the race to unlock human DNA. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, D. (2004). Understanding contemporary genomics. Perspectives on Science, 12 (3), 320–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Keller, E. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, W. (1992). A vision of the grail. In D. Kevles & L. Hood (Eds.), The code of codes. Scientific and social issues in the human genome project (pp. 83–97). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. (2007). Calamity gene. Nature, 445, 819–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. (2001, February 19). Humbled by the genome’s mysteries. New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1998). Living with our genes. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houellebecq, M. (1998). Les Particules Élémentaires. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D., & Tancredi, L. (1989). Dangerous diagnostics: The social power of biological information. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A., Sunohara, G., & Kennedy, J. (1999). Dopamine D4 receptor gene: Novelty or nonsense? Neuropsychopharmacology, 2, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohn, J. (2006). Experimental fiction. Nature, 439, 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, D. B., Halpern, A. L., Sutton, G., Heidelberg, K. B., Williamson, S., Yooseph, S. (2007). The Sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through Eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biology, 5(3), 0398–0431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, J. C. (2007). A life decoded. My genome: My life. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, E. (1880/1923). Le roman expérimental. Paris: Charpentier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2007). Genomics and self-knowledge. Implications for societal research and debate. New Genetics and Society, 26 (2), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hub Zwart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zwart, H. (2009). Genomics Metaphors and Genetic Determinism. In: Drenthen, M., Keulartz, F., Proctor, J. (eds) New Visions of Nature. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2611-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics