Skip to main content

From Belief Revision to Preference Change

  • Chapter
Preference Change

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 42))

We propose to model the consistency-preserving aspect of preference change after the fashion of belief revision. First, we discuss the formal properties of the preference notion. Second, we discuss the various consistency requirements imposed on preference sets. Third, we discuss representations of consistency-driven preference change and compare them to models of belief change. Last, we discuss the specific needs of introducing a priority index in models of preference change. We conclude that while the general input-assimilating framework from belief change can be transferred to preference change, several modifications are necessary. In particular, the input model has to be complicated with the introduction of a distinction between primary (non-linguistic) and secondary (linguistic) inputs. Sentential representation has to be used with somewhat more caution for preferences than for beliefs. The priority-setting mechanism has to be adjusted, and priority-related information must be included in the inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Robert M. 1974. Theories of actuality. Noûs 8: 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth. 1977. Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice. American Economic Review 67: 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogan, Albert P. 1919. The fundamental value universal. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 16: 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, Susan B., Suma Jacob, Martha K. McClintock, Julie A. Mennella, Sarah A. Sellergren, Natasha A. Spencer and Kathleen Stern. 2004. Women's sexual experience during the menstrual cycle: identification of the sexual phase by noninvasive measurement of luteinizing hormone. Journal of Sex Research 41 (1): 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Erik. 1997. A note on Moore's organic unities. Journal of Value Inquiry 31: 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca and Marcus W. Feldman. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. 1963. Supererogation and offence: a conceptual scheme for ethics. Ratio 5: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. and Ernest Sosa. 1966. On the logic of “intrinsically better”. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, Sven. 1997. Harman's equation and the additivity of intrinsic value. Uppsala Philosophical Studies 46: 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald. 1980. Hempel on Explaining Action. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermé, Eduardo and Sven Ove Hansson. 1999. Selective Revision. Studia Logica 63: 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fermé, Eduardo and Sven Ove Hansson. 2001. Shielded contraction. In Frontiers of belief revision, eds. Hans Rott and Mary-Anne Williams, 85–107. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, André and Sven Ove Hansson. 1994. A survey of multiple contractions. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 3: 39–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, Dov M. 1999. Compromise, update and revision. A position paper. In Dynamic worlds, eds. B. Fronhoffer and R. Pareschi, 111–148. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, Peter. 1988. Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, Sören. 1957. On the logic of ‘better’. Lund, Sweden: Library of Theoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 1994. Taking belief bases seriously. In Logic and philosophy of science in Uppsala, eds. Dag Prawitz and Dag Westerståhl, 13–28. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 1995. Changes in preference. Theory and Decision 38: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 1997. Semi-revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 7:151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 1999. A textbook of belief dynamics, theory change and database updating. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 2001a. The structure of values and norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 2001b. Preference logic. In Handbook of philosophical logic, ed. Dov Gabbay and Franz Guenthner, 2nd ed, vol 4, 319–394. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 2006. Ideal worlds — wishful thinking in deontic logic. Studia Logica 82: 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 2008. Specified meet contraction. Erkenntnis 69: 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven O. 2009. Replacement — a Sheffer stroke for belief revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38:127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert H. 1967. Toward a theory of intrinsic value. The Journal of Philosophy 64: 792–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard. 1974. Preferences among preferences. Journal of Philosophy 71(13): 377–391. Reprinted in Probability and the art of judgment, 154–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Richard. 1984. Preference and transitivity. Analysis 44: 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, Harvey. 1950. Bandwagon, snob and veblen effects in the theory of consumer's demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics 64: 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Isaac. 1974. On indeterminate probabilities. Journal of Philosophy 71: 391–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Isaac. 1977. Subjunctives, dispositions and chances. Synthese 34: 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Isaac. 1991. The fixation of belief and its undoing: changing beliefs through inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, David. 1997. Screened revision. Theoria 63: 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George. E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, Edward. 1977. An approach to a theory of intrinsic value. Philosophical Studies 32: 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, Eric J. 1997. A coherence interpretation of semi-revision. Theoria 63: 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Dennis J. 1987. Difference logic for preferences. Theory and Decision 22: 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, Blaise. 1958. Pe n s é es. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Warren S. 1974. Theories of intrinsic value. American Philosophical Quarterly 11: 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, James and David Paris. 1979. The concept of choice and arrow's theorem. Ethics 89: 354–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefoucauld Duc De La, Francois. 1871. Reflections; or sentences and moral maxims. Ed. J. W. Willis Bund and J. Hain Friswell. London: Simpson Low, Son, & Marston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1967–1969. The autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 3 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Oliver. 1987. The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: Harper & Row, Perennial Library Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1973. Behaviour and the concept of preference. Economica 40: 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1977. Rational fools. In Choice welfare and measurement, 84–106. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 1984. Satisficing consequentialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 58: 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, Wolfgang. 1978. Grundlagen der Entscheidungstheorie, Monographien Wissenschaftsthe-orie und Grundlagenforschung, No. 8. Kronberg/Ts: Scriptor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. and Gary S. Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapp, Rainer W. 1985. Utility theory and preference logic. Erkenntnis 22: 301–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, Edna and Sidney Morgenbesser. 1977. Picking and choosing. Social Research 44: 757–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, Georg H. 1963. The logic of preference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Yiying, Ricardo Proenca, Margherita Maffei, Marisa Barone, Lori Leopold and Jeffrey M. Friedman. 1994. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 372: 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O. (2009). From Belief Revision to Preference Change. In: Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O. (eds) Preference Change. Theory and Decision Library, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics