Skip to main content

The Psychoanalytic Study of Myth Since Freud Pursuing the Dream

  • Chapter
Changing the Scientific Study of Religion: Beyond Freud?

When searching for an particularly good illustration of how Freud approached the study of myth, commentators typically cite his analysis of the story of Oedipus in The Interpretation of Dreams (1900/1953). And indeed, I suspect that few would disagree with Robert Segal's (2004a, p. viii) suggestion that that particular analysis was “Freud's own key analysis” when studying myth. Taken as face value, the ease with which commentators turn to this example might seem to suggest that the psychoanalytic study of myth has been a part of the psychoanalytic tradition almost from the beginning. Yet that is misleading.

As a start, consider that Freud himself did not identify the Oedipus story as a myth. On the contrary, although he starts off by calling it “a legend that has come down to us from classical antiquity,” he quickly moves to a consideration of the Oedipus story as told specifically in Sophocles' Oedipus Rex, a literary text. Freud reinforces this emphasis on literary texts by following his analysis of Oedipus Rex with an analysis of Hamlet. In other words, the event routinely cited as being the seminal event in the psychoanalytic study of myth turns out not really to be about myth at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Adler, G. (1983). Introduction. In M. Tuby (Ed.), In the wake of Jung: A selection from Harvest (pp. 9–21). London: Coventure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. & Moyers, B. (1988). The power of myth. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. P. (1993). Alan Dundes: An introduction. The Psychoanalytic Study of Society, 18, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. P. (2005). Tribute to Alan Dundes (1934–2005). Religion, 35, 118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H. L. (1948). The place of mythology in the study of culture. American Imago, 5, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doniger, W. (1993/1999). When the lingam is just a good cigar: Psychoanalysis and Hindu sexual fantasies. In T. G. Vaidyanathan & J. J. Kripal (Eds.), Vishnu on Freud's Desk (pp. 279–303). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, W. G. (2000). Mythography: The study of myths and rituals. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (1962). Earth-diver: Creation of the mythopoeic male. American Anthropologist, 64, 1032–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (1988). The flood as male myth of creation. In A. Dundes (Ed.), The flood myth (pp. 167–182). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (2002). Preface. In A. Dundes (Ed.), Bloody Mary in the mirror: Essays in psychoan- alytic folkloristics (pp. vii–xiii). Jackson, MI: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1913/1915). The elementary forms of the religious life: A study in religious sociology (trans. J. W. Swain). London/New York: Allen & Unwin/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1900/1953). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vols. 4–5. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913/1953). Totem and taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 13 (pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1927/1961a). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vo l. 21 (pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1961b). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vo l. 21 (pp. 57–145). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1939/1964). Moses and monotheism. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 23 (pp. 1–137). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. E. (1912). Themis: A study of the social origins of Greek religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. (2001). Jesus and object use: A Winnicottian account of the resurrection myth. In D. Capps (Ed.), Freud and Freudians on religion (pp. 230–240). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A. (2003). Jung's view on myth and post-modern psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1956). Symbols of transformation. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (Ed.) (1964). Man and his symbols. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkur, D. (2005). Psychoanalytic approaches to myth: Freud and the Freudians. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, S. C. (1988). Géza Róheim's theory of the dream origin of myth. In L. B. Boyer & S. A. Grolnick (Eds.), The psychoanalytic study of society (pp. 7–28). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northup, L. A. (2006). Myth-placed priorities: Religion and the study of myth. Religious Studies Review, 32(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeyesekere, G. (1990). The work of culture: Symbolic transformation in psychoanalysis and anthropology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. B. (1999). The enigma of the oceanic feeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. A. (1996). Moses and civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. A. (2003). Review of Blood Mary in the Mirror by Alan Dundes. American Imago, 60(4), 545–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, O. (1922/2004). The myth of the birth of the hero: A psychological exploration of myth. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, A.-M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Róheim, G. (1992). Fire in the Dragon and other psychoanalytic essays on folklore. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (1990). Joseph Campbell: An introduction. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (2003a). Jung's very twentieth-century view of myth. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48, 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (2003b). Psychoanalyzing myth: From Freud to Winnicott. In D. Jonte-Pace (Ed.), Teaching Freud (pp. 137–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (2004a). Introductory essay. In O. Rank (Ed.), The myth of the birth of the hero: A psychological exploration of myth (pp. vii–xxiii). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (2004b). Myth: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segaller, S. & Berger, M. (1989). Jung: The wisdom of the dream. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sienkewicz, T. J. (1997). Theories of myth: An annotated bibliography. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. F. (1995). Jung and the Jungians on myth. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajko, V. & Leonard, M. (Eds.) (2005). Laughing with Medusa: Classical myth and feminist thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carroll, M. (2009). The Psychoanalytic Study of Myth Since Freud Pursuing the Dream. In: Belzen, J.A. (eds) Changing the Scientific Study of Religion: Beyond Freud?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2540-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics