Skip to main content

A Grade 1–9 Curriculum Framework Composed of Archetypical Phenomena and Technological Artifacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 688 Accesses

Part of the book series: Innovations in Science Education and Technology ((ISET,volume 18))

Abstract

A boy (11 years old) and a girl (11 years old) sit at a table in an after school program mixing liquids. They have just spent 10 min observing liquids in a special bottle arrangement. Two soda bottles are connected with a special tube containing two different liquids. (Drawing of special device is from Salad Dressing Physics. Permission granted from Kelvin the publisher of the curriculum.) When this arrangement is turned over, each liquid moves to replace the other. A thin stream forms in the top bottle as the liquid formerly at the bottom floats upwards, and the liquid formerly at the top sinks to the bottom. The liquids in these connected bottles are common liquids such as cooking oil, water, mineral oil, and alcohol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is from Perlman Quoting from Jung’s essay “the Philosophical tree”.

  2. 2.

    Black’s shift to an emphasis to the conceptual is also curious because he gives an example of what he considers a conceptual archetype that is heavily experience-based. He mentions Kurt Lewin pointing out that the latter in his psychological theories used such terms as “field,” “vector,” “tension,” “force,” “boundary”. In the context of a theory they may be treated as ideas but they are also grounded in physical experience such as we have with our body or as might be witnessed in a structure. (According to Naomi Quinn, in the Cultural Basis of Metaphor, many common metaphors draw on physical experiences (Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, edited by James W. Fernandez, 1991, p. 81). In addition George Lakoff and Mark Johnson give specific examples in Metaphors We Live By of multiple metaphors that can be said to be grounded in common physical experiences. There are other bases for metaphors but it appears that those grounded in physical experience have common cultural currency.)

  3. 3.

    Some psychological theories of symbol formation and development such as those of Werner and Kaplan description assert that the original connection to an object or phenomenon is not lost.

References

  • Atlas of Scientific Literacy (2003). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antovosky, Aaron (1987). Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arieti, Silvano (1976). Creativity: The Magic Synthesis, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastick, Tony (1982). Intuition: How We Think and Act. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Morris (1989). Coming To Our Senses: Body and Spirit in the Hidden History of the West. New York, Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max, (1962). Models and Metaphor, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max (1979). More about Metaphor in A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer P., & Barrett, C. (2005). Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology in Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David. Ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, John, Brown, Ann L., Cocking, Rodney (Eds.).(1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Richard (1987). Metaphor and Historical Consciousness: Organicism and Mechanism in the Study of Social Change in Cognition and Symbolic Structures in R. Haskell (Ed.), The Psychology of Metaphoric Transformation, Norwood, NJ, Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, John (1989). Generation of Spontaneous Analogies by Students Solving Science Problems in Thinking Across Cultures: Third International Conference on Thinking, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, John, & Brown, John (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science 18: 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, Benjamin (1991). The Japanese Tea Ceremony: Coherence Theory and Metaphor in Social Adaptation in James Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. Schweingruber, H., and Shouse, A. (Eds.) (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, Washington, DC, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exploring Earth in Motion: Daylight, Sun and Shadow Patterns (2000). ARIES curriculum program, Watertown, MA, Charlesbridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, James (1974). The Mission of Metaphor in Expressive Culture, Current Anthropology, 15(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, James (Ed.). (1991). Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, Brian (1978). Models as a pedagogical tool: can we learn from Maxwell? Physics Education, 13(5), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Howard E. (1978). Darwin’s “Tree of Nature” and Other Images of Wide Scope in J. Wechsler (Ed.), On Aesthetics in Science, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman P.M.(1998). The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, Richard (2003). Trees: Woodland and Western Civilization. London, Hambledon and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, Brooke (1981). Emulation and Invention, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, Gerald (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investigating Pond Organisms, Grades 1–3 [curriculum guide] Nashua, N.H., Neo-Sci, www.neosci.com

  • Jager, Bernd (1984). Body, House, City or the Intertwinings of Embodiment, Inhabitation and Civilization in D. Kruger (Ed.), The Changing Reality of Modern Man, Cape Town, Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Life Cycle of Butterflies (1996). Science, Technology and Children. Published by Carolina Biological, Burlington, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Otto (1980). A Mechanical Symbol for an Authoritarian World in K. Maurice and O. Mayr (Eds.), The Clock Work Universe, German Clocks and Automata, 1550–1650 (pp. 1–6)), New York, Neale Watson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur (1986). Imagery In Scientific Thought: Creating 20th-Centruy Physics, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisms (1996). Science and Technology for Children [curriculum guide], Washington, DC, National Science Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, Sherry (1972). On Key Symbols, American Anthropologist, 75, 1338–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Michael (1994). The Power of Trees – The Reforesting of the Soul, Dallas TX, Spring Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portoghesi, Paolo (2000). Nature and Architecture, Milano, Skira Editpre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Stephen (1942). World Hypotheses, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi (1991). The Cultural Basis of Metaphor. In James Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Paul (1980). The Clock Metaphor in the History of Psychology in Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Nickles, T. (Ed.), Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, David (1968). American Kinship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkel, Sherry (2008). Falling for Science: Objects in Mind, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor (1967). The Forest of Symbols, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Wheels. (1994). Science First Hand [video], WGBH, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M. Norton. (1979) The Mutual Embrace of Electricity and Magnetism, Science 203, 1310–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubrowski, Bernard (1996). Exploration with Bubbles: The Origins of Questions, in the videos series Learning to See [curriculum guide] Newton, MA, Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrowski, Bernard (2001). Salad Dressing Physics, in Models in Technology and Science curriculum series[curriculum guide], Farmingdale, NY, Kelvin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zubrowski, B. (2009). A Grade 1–9 Curriculum Framework Composed of Archetypical Phenomena and Technological Artifacts. In: Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of Science. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2496-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics