Skip to main content

We Have Always Been Transgenic: A Dialogue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leonardo’s Choice

Abstract

This dialogue concerns the nature of ethical responsibility in contemporary art practice, and its relation to questions of creativity; the role of writing in shaping the perception of transgenic art and related practices; and the problems that may be associated with trusting artists to act with integrity in the unchartered waters of their enthusiastic engagement with genetic technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2003) Editorial: a geography of monsters? Geoforum 34(4), pp. 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti, C. (2006). Leonardo’s choice: The ethics of artists working with genetic technologies. AI & Society 20(1), 22––34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. (1992). Animal minds. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis. Sydney: Power Pubications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1995). Foreword. In C. Hables-Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroker, A. (2004) The Transgenic Art of Telebody. Retrieved from http://www.telebody.ws/KrokerOnTELEBODY2.doc

  • Wheale, N. (Ed). (1995). The postmodern arts. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. (2002). Drawing the Line: Science and the case for animal rights. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2004). A short history of progress. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Baker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, S., Gigliotti, C. (2009). We Have Always Been Transgenic: A Dialogue. In: Gigliotti, C. (eds) Leonardo’s Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2479-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics