Skip to main content

A Survey of People’s Attitude Towards the Artificial Womb and Ectogenesis in Israel

  • Chapter
Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender

As suggested elsewhere [1] and also in this volume (see Chapter 13), the artificial womb (AW) and ectogenesis – a child brought to term outside a biological womb, might become a reality sooner than we may think. Novel research in disparate areas (such as neonatal care, assisted reproduction, embryology, fetal surgery, computer science and the human genome project) are converging to this end. Society is also pressing in this direction. Society, at large, aims at saving very premature newborns, and demands better outcomes in IVF. Because of this pressure, both sides of the gestation process, its beginning and its end (conception and birth), are presently experiencing a massive research effort. Indeed, while there is sill a huge gap between the first stages of gestation (by IVF) and the 22nd week of gestation (inside the womb), plausibly, this gap will be eventually overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. See, Simonstein, F. Artificial reproduction technologies – all the way to the artificial womb? Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care 9, 359–365 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singer, P. & Wells, D. The Reproduction Revolution: New ways to Making Babies. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harris, J. Clones, Genes and Immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Strong, C. Overview: a Framework for Reproductive Ethics. In, Ethical issues in Maternal-fetal Medicine. Ed. Dona L. Dickenson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ber, R. Ethical Issues in gestational Surrogacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 21, 153–169 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Minister of Government Services, Canada. Ottawa: Canada Communications Group. (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ayers, S., Eagle, A., & Waring, H. The effects of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder on women and their relationships: A qualitative study Psychology. Health and Medicine. 11, 389–398 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, R., Dundas, R., & Reynolds, F. Long term backache after childbirth: prospective search for causative factors. BMJ 312, 1384–1388 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altman, D. et al. Risk of Urinary Incontinence After Childbirth A 10-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology 108, 873–878 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, R., Dickens, B.M., & Fathalla, M.F. Reproductive Health and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.who.int/pmnch/en/

  12. Firestone, S. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (1970. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 3rd ed.) (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smajdor, A. The Moral Imperative for Ectogenesis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcar Ethics 16, 336–345 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kahn, S.M. Reproducing Jews. A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel Durham. North Carolina: Duke University Press (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Remennick, L. Childless in the Land of Imperative Motherhood: Stigma and Coping Among Infertile Israeli Women. Sex roles 43, 821–824 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ‘A Report of the President’s Council on Bioethics. 2004 ‘Reproduction and Responsibility’, The Regulation of New Biotechnologies. Washington, D.C. http://www.bioethics.gov

  18. Marantz, H. R. Pandora’s Baby. New York: Houghton (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Three million IVF babies born worldwide, Progress Educational Trust. http://www.ivf.net/ivf/index.php?page=out&id=2105.

  20. Singer, P. The Reproduction Revolution: New Ways of Making Babies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Peter Singer (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cannold, L. The Abortion Myth: Feminism, Morality, and the Hard Choices Women Make. Hannover: NH, University Press of New England (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frida Simonstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simonstein, F., Mashiach-Eizenberg, M. (2009). A Survey of People’s Attitude Towards the Artificial Womb and Ectogenesis in Israel. In: Simonstein, F. (eds) Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2474-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2475-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics