Tarski’s Engagement with Philosophy

  • Paolo Mancosu
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 16)

Tarski’s legacy to contemporary philosophy is huge. His epoch making works on truth and logical consequence are still widely discussed and represent key reference points in the area of history and philosophy of logic, philosophy of language and philosophy of science. Yet, however charged with philosophical potential, his papers cannot be said to provide a picture of Tarski as a general philosopher. When it comes to philosophical views, Tarski was extremely reticent to put anything in print and even those who knew him well, such as Mostowski, were unable to distil much out of his published writings.


Logical Positivist Philosophical View Predicate Variable Vienna Circle Empirical Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayer, Alfred (1977), A part of my life, London, Collins.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, Rudolf (1934), Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna, Springer. Eng. trans. Logical Syntax of Language, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1937.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, Rudolf (1935), ‘Wahrheit und Bewährung’, Actes du Congrès International de philosophie scientifique, vol. 4, Paris, Hermann, 18–23.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, Rudolf (1936a), ‘Ueber die Einheitssprache der Wissenschaft. Logische Bemerkungen zum Projekt einer Enzyklopädie’, Actes du Congrès International de philosophie scientifique, vol. 2, Paris, Hermann, 60–70.Google Scholar
  5. Carnap, Rudolf (1936b), ‘Testability and meaning’, Philosophy of Science vol. 3, 419–471, vol. 4, 1–40.Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, Rudolf (1956), ‘The methodological character of theoretical concepts’, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. I, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 38–76.Google Scholar
  7. Carnap, Rudolf (1963), ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, (Library of Living Philosophers), vol. 11, LaSalle, Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. de Rouilhan, Philippe (1998), ‘Tarski et l’universalité de la logique’, in F. Nef and D. Vernant (eds.), Le Formalisme en Question. Le Tournant des Années 1930, Paris, Vrin, 85–102.Google Scholar
  9. Feferman, Anita, and Solomon, Feferman (2004), Alfred Tarski, Life and Logic, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, Michael (2003), ‘Hempel and the Vienna Circle’, in G. L. Hardcastle and A. W. Richardson (eds.), Logical Positivism in North America, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 94–114.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, Nelson, and Willard V. O. Quine (1947), ‘Steps towards a constructive nominalism’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haller, Rudolf (1992), “Alfred Tarski, Drei Briefe an Otto Neurath’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 43, 1–32.Google Scholar
  13. Hempel, Gustav (1935), ‘On the Logical Positivists’ theory of truth’ Analysis 2, 49–59; also in Selected Philosophical Essays, R. Jeffrey (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 21–25.Google Scholar
  14. Hempel, Gustav (1988), ‘Provisoes, A problem concerning the inferential function of scientific theories’, Erkenntnis 28, 147–164; also in Selected Philosophical Essays, R. Jeffrey (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 229–49.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffman-Grüneberg, Frank (1988), Radikal-empirische Wahrheitstheorie. Eine Studie über Otto Neurath, den Wiener Kreis und das Wahrheitsproblem, Vienna, Verlag Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
  16. Kokoszyńska, Maria (1936a), ‘Syntax, Semantik und Wissenschaftslogik’, Actes du Congrès International de philosophie scientifique, vol. 3, Paris, Hermann, 9–14.Google Scholar
  17. Kokoszyńska, Maria (1936b), ‘über den absoluten Wahrheitsbegriff und einige andere semantische Begriffe’ Erkenntnis 6, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kokoszyńska, Maria (1937–1938), ‘Bemerkungen über die Einheitswissenschaft’, Erkenntnis 7, 325–335.Google Scholar
  19. Mancosu, Paolo (2005), ‘Harvard 1940–1941, Tarski, Carnap and Quine on a finitistic language of mathematics for science’, History and Philosophy of Logic 26, 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mancosu, Paolo (2006), “Tarski on models and logical consequence”, in J. Ferreiros, J. Gray (eds.), The Architecture of Modern Mathematics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 209–237.Google Scholar
  21. Mancosu, Paolo (2008), ‘Neurath, Tarski and Kokoszyńska on the semantic conception of truth’, in D. Patterson (ed.), Essays on Tarski. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 192–224.Google Scholar
  22. Mostowski, Andrzej (1967), ‘Alfred Tarski’, in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards (ed.), vol. 8, New York, McMillan.Google Scholar
  23. Neurath, Otto (1936), ‘Erster Internationaler Kongress für Einheit der Wissenschaft in Paris 1935’, Erkenntnis, 377–430.Google Scholar
  24. Poznański, Edward and Alexander, Wundheiler (1934), ‘Pojecie prawdy na terenie fizyki’ (The concept of truth in physics), in Fragmenty Filozoficzne, Warsaw, 97–143. A partial German translation by Rose Rand in Carnap’s Nachlass is found under call number RC 081-37-01.Google Scholar
  25. Rodriguez-Consuegra, F. (2007), ‘Two unpublished contributions by Alfred Tarski’, History and Philosophy of Logic 28, 257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rojszczak, Artur (2002), ‘Philosophical background and philosophical content of the semantic definition of truth’, Erkenntnis 56, 29–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suppes, Patrick (1988), ‘Philosophical implications of Tarski’s work’ The Journal of Symbolic Logic 53, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tarski, Alfred (1932), ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in der Sprachen der deduktiven Disziplinen’, Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 69, 23–25. Reprinted in Tarski 1986, vol. I.Google Scholar
  29. Tarski. Alfred (1933), ‘Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych’, (The concept of truth in the languages of deductives sciences), Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, wydzial III, no. 34.Google Scholar
  30. Tarski, Alfred (1935a), ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica (Lemberg) 1, 261–405. Reprinted in Tarski 1986, vol. II. Eng. trans. in Tarski 1956, 152–278Google Scholar
  31. Tarski, Alfred (1944), “A philosophical letter of Alfred Tarski’ with a prefatory note by Morton White’, Journal of Philosophy 84(1987), 28–32.Google Scholar
  32. Tarski, Alfred (1956), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Second edition, 1983.Google Scholar
  33. Tarski, Alfred (1986), Collected Papers, S. Givant and R. McKenzie (eds.), vols. I–IV, Basel, Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  34. Tugendhat, Ernst (1960), ‘Tarskis semantische Definition der Wahrheit und ihre Stellung innerhalb der Geschichte des Wahrheitsproblems im logischen Positivismus’, Philosophische Rundschau 8, 131–159; reprinted in G. Skirbekk, Wahrheitstheorien, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1977, 189–223.Google Scholar
  35. Uebel, Thomas (1992), Overcoming Logical Positivism from within. The emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism from the Vienna Circle’s Protocolol Debate. Amsterdam, Rodopi.Google Scholar
  36. Woleński, Jan (1993), ‘Tarski as a philosopher’, in F. Coniglione, R. Polis and J. Woleński (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 319–338.Google Scholar
  37. Woleński, Jan (1995), ‘On Tarski’s background’, in J. Hintikka (ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 331–341.Google Scholar
  38. Woleński, Jan and Eberhard Köhler (1998), Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Mancosu
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations