Import of water in virtual form, i.e. in the form of agricultural and industrial commodities, can be an effective means for water-scarce countries to preserve their domestic water resources. On the other hand, export of water-intensive commodities will increase the use and thus the scarcity of water in the exporting countries. Another likely effect of international trade is that it increases dependency of nations that are net importers of water-intensive commodities on net exporters. This paper reviews the following questions: how relevant is international trade in magnifying water scarcity in some nations and in alleviating water scarcity in other nations, and to which extent does international trade contribute to national water dependency?
It is shown that the current global trade pattern significantly influences water use in most countries of the world, either by reducing domestic water use or by enhancing it. In the period 1997–2001, 16% of the water use in the world was not for producing products for domestic consumption but for making products for export. Many of the water problems in the export countries are partially related to their export position. On the other hand, domestic water savings can be enormous for the import countries, i.e. the countries that have partly externalized their water footprint. Jordan annually imports a virtual water quantity that is five times its own yearly renewable water resources. Although saving its domestic water resources, it makes Jordan heavily dependent on other nations, for instance the United States. Other water-scarce countries with high virtual water import dependency (25–50%) are for instance Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Algeria, Libya, Yemen and Mexico.
It is suggested that future national and regional water policy studies include an assessment of the effects of trade on water security. For water-scarce countries, it would also be wise to do the reverse: study the possible implications of national water scarcity on trade. In water-scarce countries a trade-off is to be made between (over)exploitation of the domestic water resources in order to increase water self-sufficiency (the apparent strategy of Egypt) or virtual water import at the cost of becoming water dependent (Jordan).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allan, J.A., 2001a: Virtual water — Economically invisible and politically silent — A way to solve strategic water problems. International Water and Irrigation, Nov: 39–41.
Allan, J.A., 2001b: The Middle East water question: Hydropolitics and the global economy. I.B. Tauris, London.
Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y. and Savenije, H.H.G., 2006: Water saving through international trade of agricultural products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(3): 455–468.
De Fraiture, C., Cai, X., Amarasinghe, U., Rosegrant, M. and Molden, D., 2004: Does international cereal trade save water? The impact of virtual water trade on global water use, comprehensive assessment, Research Report 4 IWMI, Colombo.
FAO, 2007: AQUASTAT. Online database: www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm.
Greenaway, F., Hassan, R. and Reed, G.V. (1994) An empirical-analysis of comparative advantage in Egyptian agriculture. Applied Economics, 26(6): 649–657.
Haddadin, M.J., 2003: Exogenous water: A conduit to globalization of water resources. In: A.Y. Hoekstra (Ed.), Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, pp. 159–169.
Hoekstra, A.Y. (Ed.), 2003: Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Delft, The Netherlands, 12–13 December 2002, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12, UNESCO-IHE, Delft.
Hoekstra, A.Y. and Chapagain, A.K., 2007: Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management, 21(1): 35–48.
Hoekstra, A.Y. and Chapagain, A.K., 2008: Globalization of water: Sharing the planet's freshwater resources. Blackwell, Oxford.
Hoekstra, A.Y., and Hung, P.Q., 2005: Globalisation of water resources: International virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 45–56.
ITC, 2004: PC-TAS version 1997–2001, Harmonized System. CD-ROM, International Trade Centre, Geneva.
Maclean, J.L., Dawe, D.C., Hardy, B. and Hettel, G.P., 2002: Rice almanac: Source book for the most important economic activity on earth, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
Oki, T. and Kanae, S., 2004: Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Science and Technology, 49(7): 203–209.
Ramirez-Vallejo, J. and Rogers, P., 2004: Virtual water flows and trade liberalization. Water Science and Technology, 49(7): 25–32.
Wichelns, D., 2001: The role of ‘virtual water’ in efforts to achieve food security and other national goals, with an example from Egypt. Agricultural Water Management, 49(2): 131–151.
Yang, H., Wang, L., Abbaspour, K.C. and Zehnder, A.J.B., 2006: Virtual water trade: An assessment of water use efficiency in the international food trade. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10: 443–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hoekstra, A.Y. (2009). Water Security of Nations: How International Trade Affects National Water Scarcity and Dependency. In: Jones, J.A.A., Vardanian, T.G., Hakopian, C. (eds) Threats to Global Water Security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2344-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2344-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2343-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2344-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)