Skip to main content

Abstract

The risk assessment procedure made either for protection of ecosystem or human health is normally based on standardized toxicological test methods. Most of these tests are expensive and require in vivo animal experiments. On the other side, it is important to detect low concentrations of toxic substances in various mixtures that are present together with other non-toxic compounds, as early, as possible. For this early warning the traditional methods in toxicology cannot supply an adequate basis. Recently, some relatively inexpensive and simple methods suitable for classification of dangerous wastes and pollution of surface water have been developed. The practical implementation of such methods would have of high significance in the assessment of the state of surface waters (rivers and lakes), as well, as industrial effluents. In order to compare the performance of the various bioassays a series of examinations have been carried out with various methods. Microbio-test kits seem to be especially useful for the water quality assessment of rivers and lakes. Data are given on the monitoring of some important habitats in Hungary. The toxicity estimation with different bioindicators discussed in the presentation can give us a habitat-specific indication of the pollution. The results revealed that the alternative tests are sensitive to indicate the combined effect of various pollutants in aquatic ecosystems. It seems to be that the tests using crustacean species would give realistic results in well-defined point sources, but they can be accepted somewhat more sceptic when comparing samples taken form different habitats. Daphnia heart rate were specific for a number of compounds. Presently the luminescent bacterial systems are extensively used as standardized bioassays in the environmental impact assessment. An important conclusion of the results that there is no universal bioassay available for detection of all types of pollution. The best results can be obtained with employment of a battery of bioassays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buffagni, A., Birk, S., Erba, S., Cazzola, M., Feld, C., Murray-Bligh, J., Furse, M.T., Clarke, R., Ofenböck, T., Hering, D. and Soszka, H. 2004. Matrix of possible class boundaries of grades of ecological status associated of different methods and stressors. STAR project to the European CIS intercalibration process, 11th deliverable, 31/12/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • BS EN ISO 11348.3, Part 3. 1999. Method Using Freeze-dried Bacteria. Anon. Infonorme London Information, Ascot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. 1983. Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental hazard? Hydrobiologia, 100, 47–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, F.G. 2001. A review of the Microtox® toxicity test system for assessing the toxicity of sediments and soils. Water Quality Res. J. Canada, 36, 475–518.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fentem, J.H. and Balls, M. 2003. Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods. In: Current Situation in the European Union Alternative Toxicological Methods, Vol. 1, Part 2, pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, R., Munz, C.D. and Scholtz, R. 1994. Evaluation and application of aquatic toxicity tests: use of the Microtox test for the prediction of toxicity based upon concentrations of contaminants in soil. Hydrobiologia, 273, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, I. 2001. Use of alternative bioassays in the water quality assessment. In: Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. (Ed), Pollution Surveillance and Control in Wetland Ecosystems. EuroLab Course, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2003. Evaluation of some alternative guidelines for risk assessment of various habitats, Toxicology letters 2003, 140–141, 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2002. A comparison of some alternative ecotoxicological methods in the pollution surveillance of wetland ecosystems. In: Foth, H. (Ed.), Risk Assessment and Management of Large Contamination Sites. Proc. of Congress, Halle, Swg4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2001. Role of environmental factors on the reproducibility of Lemna test. Acta Biol. Hung, 52, 179–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, R., Pattard, M., Pernak K-D. and Winter, A. 1989. Results of harmful effects of selected water pollutants (anilines, phenols, aliphatic compounds) to Daphnia magna. Water res., 23, 495–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Barera, J. 1995. Biomarkers in Ecotoxicology. Eurotox Proc. Toxicology in Transition. Springer V. Berlin, pp. 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, 1990. Ecotoxicology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccarty, L.S., Power, M. and Munkittrick, K.R. 2002. Bioindicators versus biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological risk assessment, 8, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markert, B.A., Breure, A.M. and Zechmeister, H.G. 2003. Definition, strategies and principles for bioindicators/biomonitoring of the environment. Trace Metals and Other Contaminants in the Environ., 6, 3–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2002. Lemna sp. Growth inhibition test. Draft Guideline 221, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoon, G. and Jansen, C.R. 1998. Freshwater Invertebrate Toxicity Tests. In: Calow, P. (Ed.) Handbook of Ecotoxicology. Blackwell Science, UK, pp. 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoon, G. 2000. Overview of the FITA4 Programme Sustainable Development/Water Quality and Human Health. International Workshop, Budapest, pp. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, T., Kováts, N., Kiss, I. and Bozó, T. 2000. Factors Influencing Extrapolation of Laboratory Lemna Tests to Field Conditions. Fifth International Symposium and Exhibition on Environmental Contamination in Central and Eastern Europe, Prague, Proceedings (CD ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Törökné, A. and Takács, Z. 2000. Effect of cylindrospermopsin and a newly isolated cyanobacterial toxin on Thamnocephalus platyurus. In: Sustainable Development/Water Quality and Human Health. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Budapest, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 1996. OPPTS 850.4400 Aquatic Plant Toxicity Test Using Lemna spp. Public Draft, EPA 712-C-96-156. p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. 1990. Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing. Environmental Res., 52, 7–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kiss, I. (2009). The Use of Biomarkers in the Toxicological Risk Assessment. In: Simeonov, L.I., Hassanien, M.A. (eds) Exposure and Risk Assessment of Chemical Pollution — Contemporary Methodology. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2335-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics