Abstract
The risk assessment procedure made either for protection of ecosystem or human health is normally based on standardized toxicological test methods. Most of these tests are expensive and require in vivo animal experiments. On the other side, it is important to detect low concentrations of toxic substances in various mixtures that are present together with other non-toxic compounds, as early, as possible. For this early warning the traditional methods in toxicology cannot supply an adequate basis. Recently, some relatively inexpensive and simple methods suitable for classification of dangerous wastes and pollution of surface water have been developed. The practical implementation of such methods would have of high significance in the assessment of the state of surface waters (rivers and lakes), as well, as industrial effluents. In order to compare the performance of the various bioassays a series of examinations have been carried out with various methods. Microbio-test kits seem to be especially useful for the water quality assessment of rivers and lakes. Data are given on the monitoring of some important habitats in Hungary. The toxicity estimation with different bioindicators discussed in the presentation can give us a habitat-specific indication of the pollution. The results revealed that the alternative tests are sensitive to indicate the combined effect of various pollutants in aquatic ecosystems. It seems to be that the tests using crustacean species would give realistic results in well-defined point sources, but they can be accepted somewhat more sceptic when comparing samples taken form different habitats. Daphnia heart rate were specific for a number of compounds. Presently the luminescent bacterial systems are extensively used as standardized bioassays in the environmental impact assessment. An important conclusion of the results that there is no universal bioassay available for detection of all types of pollution. The best results can be obtained with employment of a battery of bioassays.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buffagni, A., Birk, S., Erba, S., Cazzola, M., Feld, C., Murray-Bligh, J., Furse, M.T., Clarke, R., Ofenböck, T., Hering, D. and Soszka, H. 2004. Matrix of possible class boundaries of grades of ecological status associated of different methods and stressors. STAR project to the European CIS intercalibration process, 11th deliverable, 31/12/04.
BS EN ISO 11348.3, Part 3. 1999. Method Using Freeze-dried Bacteria. Anon. Infonorme London Information, Ascot, UK.
Cairns, J. 1983. Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental hazard? Hydrobiologia, 100, 47–57.
Doherty, F.G. 2001. A review of the Microtox® toxicity test system for assessing the toxicity of sediments and soils. Water Quality Res. J. Canada, 36, 475–518.
Fentem, J.H. and Balls, M. 2003. Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods. In: Current Situation in the European Union Alternative Toxicological Methods, Vol. 1, Part 2, pp. 31–42.
Galli, R., Munz, C.D. and Scholtz, R. 1994. Evaluation and application of aquatic toxicity tests: use of the Microtox test for the prediction of toxicity based upon concentrations of contaminants in soil. Hydrobiologia, 273, 179–189.
Kiss, I. 2001. Use of alternative bioassays in the water quality assessment. In: Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. (Ed), Pollution Surveillance and Control in Wetland Ecosystems. EuroLab Course, pp. 43–52.
Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2003. Evaluation of some alternative guidelines for risk assessment of various habitats, Toxicology letters 2003, 140–141, 411–417.
Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2002. A comparison of some alternative ecotoxicological methods in the pollution surveillance of wetland ecosystems. In: Foth, H. (Ed.), Risk Assessment and Management of Large Contamination Sites. Proc. of Congress, Halle, Swg4.
Kiss, I., Kováts, N. and Szalay, T. 2001. Role of environmental factors on the reproducibility of Lemna test. Acta Biol. Hung, 52, 179–185.
Kuehn, R., Pattard, M., Pernak K-D. and Winter, A. 1989. Results of harmful effects of selected water pollutants (anilines, phenols, aliphatic compounds) to Daphnia magna. Water res., 23, 495–499.
Lopez-Barera, J. 1995. Biomarkers in Ecotoxicology. Eurotox Proc. Toxicology in Transition. Springer V. Berlin, pp. 57–79.
Moriarty, 1990. Ecotoxicology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Mccarty, L.S., Power, M. and Munkittrick, K.R. 2002. Bioindicators versus biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological risk assessment, 8, 159–164.
Markert, B.A., Breure, A.M. and Zechmeister, H.G. 2003. Definition, strategies and principles for bioindicators/biomonitoring of the environment. Trace Metals and Other Contaminants in the Environ., 6, 3–39.
OECD. 2002. Lemna sp. Growth inhibition test. Draft Guideline 221, July 2002.
Persoon, G. and Jansen, C.R. 1998. Freshwater Invertebrate Toxicity Tests. In: Calow, P. (Ed.) Handbook of Ecotoxicology. Blackwell Science, UK, pp. 51–65.
Persoon, G. 2000. Overview of the FITA4 Programme Sustainable Development/Water Quality and Human Health. International Workshop, Budapest, pp. 5–13.
Szalay, T., Kováts, N., Kiss, I. and Bozó, T. 2000. Factors Influencing Extrapolation of Laboratory Lemna Tests to Field Conditions. Fifth International Symposium and Exhibition on Environmental Contamination in Central and Eastern Europe, Prague, Proceedings (CD ROM).
Törökné, A. and Takács, Z. 2000. Effect of cylindrospermopsin and a newly isolated cyanobacterial toxin on Thamnocephalus platyurus. In: Sustainable Development/Water Quality and Human Health. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Budapest, p. 16.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 1996. OPPTS 850.4400 Aquatic Plant Toxicity Test Using Lemna spp. Public Draft, EPA 712-C-96-156. p. 8.
Wang, W. 1990. Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing. Environmental Res., 52, 7–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kiss, I. (2009). The Use of Biomarkers in the Toxicological Risk Assessment. In: Simeonov, L.I., Hassanien, M.A. (eds) Exposure and Risk Assessment of Chemical Pollution — Contemporary Methodology. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2335-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2335-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2334-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2335-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)