Skip to main content

Robust Automatic Mapping Algorithms in a Network Monitoring Scenario

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
geoENV VII – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 16))

  • 1603 Accesses

Abstract

Automatically generating maps of a measured variable of interest can be problematic. In this work we focus on the monitoring network context where observations are collected and reported by a network of sensors, and are then transformed into interpolated maps for use in decision making. Using traditional geostatistical methods, estimating the covariance structure of data collected in an emergency situation can be difficult. Variogram determination, whether by method-of-moment estimators or by maximum likelihood, is very sensitive to extreme values. Even when a monitoring network is in a routine mode of operation, sensors can sporadically malfunction and report extreme values. If this extreme data destabilises the model, causing the covariance structure of the observed data to be incorrectly estimated, the generated maps will be of little value, and the uncertainty estimates in particular will be misleading. Marchant and Lark (2007) propose a REML estimator for the covariance, which is shown to work on small data sets with a manual selection of the damping parameter in the robust likelihood. We show how this can be extended to allow treatment of large data sets together with an automated approach to all parameter estimation. The projected process kriging framework of Ingram et al. (2008) is extended to allow the use of robust likelihood functions, including the two component Gaussian and the Huber function. We show how our algorithm is further refined to reduce the computational complexity while at the same time minimising any loss of information. To show the benefits of this method, we use data collected from radiation monitoring networks across Europe. We compare our results to those obtained from traditional kriging methodologies and include comparisons with Box–Cox transformations of the data. We discuss the issue of whether to treat or ignore extreme values, making the distinction between the robust methods which ignore outliers and transformation methods which treat them as part of the (transformed) process. Using a case study, based on an extreme radiological events over a large area, we show how radiation data collected from monitoring networks can be analysed automatically and then used to generate reliable maps to inform decision making. We show the limitations of the methods and discuss potential extensions to remedy these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://eurdep.jrc.it/.

  2. 2.

    German Federal Office for Radiation Protection.

References

  • Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc 26(2):211–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Hawkins DM (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12(2):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csató L, Opper M (2002) Sparse online Gaussian processes. Neural Comput 14(3):641–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Tawn JA, Moyeed RA (1998) Model-based geostatistics. Appl Stat 47:299–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Genton MG (1998) Highly robust variogram estimation. Math Geol 30(2):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram B, Csató L, Evans D (2005) Fast spatial interpolation using sparse Gaussian processes. Appl GIS 1(2):15:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram B, Cornford D, Evans D (2008) Fast algorithms for automatic mapping with space-limited covariance functions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(5):661–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant BP, Lark RM (2007) Robust estimation of the variogram by residual maximum likelihood. Geoderma 140(1–2):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilz J, Pluch P, Spoeck G (2004) Bayesian Kriging with lognormal data and uncertain variogram parameters. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on geostatistics for environmental applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the European Commission, under the Sixth Framework Programme, by the Contract N. 033811 with the DG INFSO, action Line IST-2005-2.5.12 ICT for Environmental Risk Management. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Ingram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingram, B., Cornford, D., Csató, L. (2010). Robust Automatic Mapping Algorithms in a Network Monitoring Scenario. In: Atkinson, P., Lloyd, C. (eds) geoENV VII – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2322-3_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics