Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 39))

In general, model reduction techniques fall into two categories — moment —matching and Krylov techniques and balancing techniques. The present contribution is concerned with the former. The present contribution proposes the use of a perturbative representation as an alternative to the bilinear representation [4]. While for weakly nonlinear systems, either approximation is satisfactory, it will be seen that the perturbative method has several advantages over the bilinear representation. In this contribution, an improved reduction method is proposed. Illustrative examples are chosen, and the errors obtained from the different reduction strategies will be compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Moore (1981). Principal Component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, Observability and model reduction, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26, 1, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.C. Antoulas, D.C. Sorensen and S. Gugercin (2001). A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems, Contemporary Mathematics, AMS Publications, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.A. Beattie and S. Gugercin (2007). Krylov-based minimization for optimal H2 model reduction, 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Phillips (2003). Projection-based approaches for model reduction of weakly nonlinear, time-varying systems, IEEE Transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems 22, 2, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Condon and R. Ivanov (2005a). Nonlinear systems-Algebraic Gramians and Model Reduction, COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 24, 1, 202–219.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Condon and R. Ivanov (2005b). Balanced Model Reduction from a Perturbative Representation of Weakly Nonlinear Systems, NOLTA 2005, Bruges.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Veijola and L. Costa (1998). Combined electrical and thermal circuit simulation using APLAC, Circuit Theory Laboratory Report Series, No. CT-34, Helsinki University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Condon, M., Grahovski, G.G. (2009). Model Reduction of Weakly Nonlinear Systems. In: Ao, SI., Gelman, L. (eds) Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computational Science. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2310-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2311-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics