Skip to main content

Moral Acquaintances and Natural Facts in the Darwinian Age

  • Chapter
The Normativity of the Natural

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture ((PSCC,volume 16))

  • 568 Accesses

Standard interpretations of the relevance of natural facts through natural law theory tend to fail once one considers the full implications of evolutionary theory. This chapter argues that natural facts about human beings can still have moral meaning in this context. After a brief discussion of natural law, it is shown that the moral acquaintanceships between human beings (and possibly other beings as well) can give moral meaning to many of the facts about human existence. The importance of these facts may appear similar to the importance granted by natural law theories—and the relevant facts themselves may be quite similar—but the systems differ both in their justification for the importance of natural facts and in the relevance of contingently true facts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ackerman, D. (2004, June 15). I sing the body’s pattern recognition machine. The New York Times. [On-line]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/15/science/15patt.html.

  • Aquinas, T. (2006) The summa theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas (Second and Revised Edition, 1920), Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). [On-line]. Available: http://www.newadvent.org/summa.

  • Aristotle (1908). Nicomachean ethics, W. D. Ross (trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, M. (1986). The handmaid’s tale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N.H. & Charlesworth, B. (1998). Why sex and recombination? Science, 281, 1986–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (1992). The animals issue: Moral theory in practice. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1887). Darwin to Lyell, in F. Darwin (ed.), The life and letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. ii. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. New York:Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. & Lanting, F. (1997). Bonobo: The forgotten ape. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P. (2000). Social Darwinism: Linking evolutionary thought to social theory. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowski, D.A. (1997). Babies and beasts: The argument from marginal cases. Chicago:University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Lobo, A. (2002). Morality and the human goods: An introduction to natural law ethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1997). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. (1986). What is wrong with slavery? in P. Singer (ed.), Applied ethics (pp. 165–184). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, A.E., Thomas, N.H., Cook, L.J., Ellison, D.W., & Walker, J. (1998). Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy with anhidrosis (type IV). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(2), 84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1983). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. J.B. Schneewind (ed.).Indianapolis: Hackett Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.E., Bensch, S., & Price, T.D. (2001a). Speciation in a ring. Nature, 409(6818), 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.E., Irwin, J.H., & Price, T.D. (2001b). Ring species as bridges between microevolution and speciation. Genetica, 112–113, 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P. (2002, June). Saved from extinction: Evolutionary theorising, politics and the state. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(2), 330–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. (2006, January 31). Does your iPod play favorites? Newsweek. [On-line]. Available: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6854309/site/newsweek.

  • Loewy, E. (1997). Moral strangers, moral acquaintance, and moral friends. New York: StateUniversity of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, P.A. (2002). Autonomic neuropathies. Current Opinion in Neurology, 15(5), 605–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M.C. (2001). Natural law and practical rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2002). The natural law tradition in ethics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.[On-line]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/#1.

  • Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S.M. (1987). Justice and gender. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16(1), 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W. (1802). Natural theologies. [On-line]. Available: home.att.net/∼p.caimi/oremia.html.

  • Plato (2006). The republic. R. E. Allen (trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope John Paul II. (1984). Apostolic letter Salvifici Doloris of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II to the bishops, to the priests, to the religious families and to the faithful of the Catholic Church on the Christian meaning of human suffering. [On-line]. Available: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_11021984_salvifici-doloris_en.html.

  • Pope Paul VI. (1968). Humanae vitae. [On-line]. Available: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html.

  • Rachels, J. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T., & Singer, P. (eds.) (1989). Animal rights and human obligations, second edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2000). A Darwinian left: Politics, evolution, and cooperation. New Haven:Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, T.N., Sprung, J., Ackerman, J.D., Bojanic, K., Watson, J.C., & Dyck, P.J. (2006). Anesthesia and patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain. Anesthesiology, 105(2), 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanson, S.S. (2009). Moral Acquaintances and Natural Facts in the Darwinian Age. In: Cherry, M.J. (eds) The Normativity of the Natural. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2301-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics