Abstract
Technology is a major force in modern societies, co-shaping most of its aspects, including established moral norms and values. Technology Assessment aims to explore the consequences of New and Emerging Science and Technology [NEST] in advance, to help create better technology. This article develops a method for enhancing our moral imagination with regard to future techno-moral change. At the core of this method lies so-called NEST-ethics, the argumentative patterns and tropes that constitute the ‘grammar’ of ethical discussions about emerging technologies. This grammar can be applied to explore at forehand the moral controversies and even the moral changes that are provoked by these technologies. In the form of alternative techno-moral scenarios these explorations can be used to inform and enhance public deliberation on the desirability of the NEST in question. This results in a type of ethical TA that is self-reflective regarding its own moral standards. To illustrate our method, we offer ‘fragments’ of a techno-moral scenario on the moral consequences of the introduction of a future ObesityPill.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berman, M. (1983). All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. The Experience of Modernity (3 ed.). London, New York: Verso.
Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutic and Praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bijker, W. (2001). The Need for Public Intellectuals. A Space for STS. Science, Technology & Human Values, 28(4), 443–450.
Coeckelberg, M. (2007). Imagination and Principles. An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: H.Holt & Co.
Dewey, J. (1954). The Later Works. Athens OH: Swallow Press Books.
Dohmen, J. (Ed.). (2002). Over levenskunst. De grote filosofen over het goede leven. Amsterdam: Ambo.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London, New York: Routledge.
Ferretti, M. P. (2007). Why Public Participation in Risk Regulation? The Case of Authorizing GMO Products in the European Union. Science as Culture, 16(4), 377–395.
Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and Moral Imagination. Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). Wharheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (Vol. Band 1). Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kass, L. R. (1997). The Wisdom of Repugnance. The New Republic, 216(22), 17–26.
Kass, L. R. (2002). Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books.
Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., and Swierstra, T. (eds.). (2002). Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Keulartz, J., Schermer, M., Korthals, M., and Swierstra, T. (2004). Ethics in a technological culture. A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 3–29.
Larmore, C. (1987). Patterns of Moral Complexity (2 ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Logister, L. (2004). Creatieve Democratie. John Deweys pragmatisme als grondslag voor een democratische samenleving. Budel: Damon.
Mackenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2 ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
McGee, G. (2002). The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nietzsche, F. (1955). Werke in drei Bänden,(Vol. III). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Notten, P. W. F., Rotmans, J., and Asselt, M. B. A. V. (2003). An updated scenario typology. Futures, 35, 423–443.
Rip, A., and Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change. Volume two: Resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2004). The Case Against Perfection. The Atlantic Monthly(April).
Schermer, M. (2001). The different faces of autonomy. A study on patient autonomy in ethical theory and hospital practice. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The invention of Autonomy. A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (1 ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sclove, R. E. (1995). Democracy and Technology. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Skinner, Q. (1990). Political Philosophy. In C. Schmitt and Q. Skinner (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (2 ed., pp. 389–453). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swierstra, T. (2002). Moral vocabularies and public debate. The cases of cloning and new reproductive technologies. In J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer and T. Swierstra (Eds.), Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Swierstra, T. (2004a). Een tumor is ook collectief bezit. Het afstaan van lichaamsmateriaal ten behoeve van DNA-banken. Krisis. Tijdschrift voor empirische filosofie, 5(4), 36–54.
Swierstra, T. (2004b). Slachtoffer of burger? Een essay over het nader gebruik van lichaamsmateriaal ten behoeve van genomics onderzoek. Amsterdam: NVBE.
Swierstra, T., and Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics. Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. NanoEthics, 1(1), 3–20.
Trappenburg, M. (2003). Darwin in de medische ethiek. In M. Adams, J. Griffiths and G. d. Hartogh (Eds.), Euthanasie. Nieuwe knelpunten in een voortgezette discussie (pp. 237–254). Kampen: Kok.
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press/Collins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D., Boenink, M. (2009). Exploring Techno-Moral Change: The Case of the ObesityPill. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2228-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2229-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)