Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interdisciplinarity, Applied Ethics and Social Science

  • Chapter
Evaluating New Technologies

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 3))

Abstract

The bonds between applied ethics and social science seem to become increasingly tight. This does not only manifest itself by social scientists and ethicists working together, but also by an increasing attention, from both sides, to the very nature of their cooperation. The debate on this topic has been ongoing for more than twenty years, but in the last years the discussion became more intense. However, one can doubt whether up until now the relevant questions have been sufficiently distinguished. Particularly the notion “empirical ethics” creates more confusion than clarification with regard to the different conceptual and methodological dimensions. The methodological debates show a wide spectrum of topics. This paper aims to make an inventory of the questions raised in the debate on the role of empirical research in (applied) ethics. We argue that there are at least five distinct groups of questions to be found in this debate, concerning: (1) the fact-value gap, (2) the notions of ‘discipline’ and ‘interdisciplinary’, (3) the nature of both ethics and social sciences, (4) the type of empirical research relevant for ethics, (5) the embeddedness of the individual researcher. The paper concludes with some suggestions for further debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvarez, A.A.A. (2001), “How Rational should Bioethics be? The Value of Empirical Approaches”, Bioethics 15 (5/6), 501–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnason, V. (2005), “Sensible Discussion in Bioethics: Reflections on Interdisciplinary Research”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics14, 322–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.M. and Forrow, L. (1993), “Empirical Research in Medical Ethics: An Introduction”, Theoretical Medicine 14, 195–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, R.E. (2003), “Constructing Empirical Bioethics: Foucauldian Reflections on the Empirical Turn in Bioethics Research”, Health Care Analysis, 11 (1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, R.S. (2001), “Checklists for Improving Rigour in Qualitative Research: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog?”, BMJ 322, 1115–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (1989), Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress J.F. (2001), Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fifth Edition. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. and Cribb, A. (2003), “The Relevance of Empirical Research to Bioethics: Reviewing the Debate”, in: Häyry & Takala (2003a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. (1999), “Ethics and Social Science: Which Kind of Co-Operation?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice2, 319–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., and Dierickx, K. (2004a), “What is the Role of Empirical Research in Bioethical Reflection and Decision-Making? An Ethical Analysis”, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., and Dierickx, K. (2004b), “Empirical Ethics: A Challenge to Bioethics”, editorial, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., and Dierickx, K. (2005), “The Birth of the Empirical Turn in Bioethics”, Bioethics19 (1), 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosk, C.L. (1999), “Professional Ethicist Available: Logical, Secular, Friendly”, Daedalus 128 (4), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenkerk, B. (2006), “Biotechnology, Disagreement and the Limitations of Pubic Debate”, in Kaiser, M. & Lien, M.E. (eds.), Preprints of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics: Ethics and the Politics of Food, Oslo, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenkerk, B. and Poort, L.M. (2008), “The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate”, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22 (1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B.A. (1993), “Assessing Empirical Research in Bioethics”, Theoretical Medicine 14, 211–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. and Jennings, B. (eds.) (1983), Ethics, The Social Sciences and Policy Analysis. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, K.D. and Gert, B. (1990), “A Critique of Principlism”, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2), 219–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A. (2005), “Informed Consent: Bioethical Ideal and Empirical Reality”, in: Häyry & Takala (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devries, R. and Subedi, J. (eds.) (1998), Bioethics and Society: Contructing the Ethical Enterprise. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M. and Steigleder, K. (2003), Bioethik; Eine Einführung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M. (2008), Bioethik; Methoden, Theorien und Bereiche, Stuttgart [etc.]: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M. (2005), “Sozialwissenschaften, Gesellschaftstheorie und Ethik”, Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. and Swazey, J. (1984), “Medical Morality is not Bioethics- Medical Ethics in China and the United States”, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27, 337–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, M.J. (2005), “Evidence Based Ethics? On Evidence-Based Practice and the “Empirical Turn” from Normative Ethics”, BMC Medical Ethics 6 (11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2004), “The Normative Basis of (Health) Technology Assessment and the Role of Ethical Expertise”, Poiesis & Praxis 2, 145–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, M. (2005), “Disziplinarität und Inter-Disziplinnarität in Methodologischer Sicht”, Technikfolgenabschätzung- Theorie und Praxis 2 (14), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, E. (2002), “What Can the Social Science Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substantive Considerations”, Bioethics 16 (2), 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartogh, G. den (1999), “Empirie en Theorievorming in de Ethiek”, K&M: tijdschrift voor empirische ethiek 23, 172–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Have, H.A.M.J., and Lelie, A. (1998), “Medical Ethics Research Between Theory and Practice”, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19, 263–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, M. and Takala, T. (eds.) (2003a) Scratching the Surface of Bioethics. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, M. and Takala, T. (2003b), “What is Bioethics All About? A Start”, in: Häyry & Takala (2003a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, M. and Takala, T. (eds.) (2005), Bioethics and Social Reality. Amsterdam: Rodopi Hedgecoe, A.M. (2001), “Ethical Boundary Work: Geneticization, Philosophy and the Social Sciences”, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 4, 305–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe, A.M. (2004), “Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics”, Bioethics 18 (2), 120–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeger, R. and Willigenburg, T. van (1993), The turn to applied ethics. Kampen: Kok Pharos Hoffmaster (1990), “Morality and the social sciences”, in: Weisz (1990). pp. 241–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. and Jonas, M. (2004) Engaging the world: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology. Amsterdam [etc.]: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J, Schermer, M., Korthals, M. and Swierstra, T. (2004), “Ethics in Technological Culture: A Programmatic Proposal for a Pragmatist Approach”, Science, Technology & Human Values 29 (1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krones, T. and Richter, G. (2003), “Kontextsensitive Ethik”, in: Düwell & Steigleder (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. (2003a), “Public Consultation in Bioethics. What’s the Point of Asking the Public When They Have Neither Scientific Nor Ethical Expertise?”, Health Care Analysis 11 (1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. (2003b), “Better Together? Sociological and Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics”, in: Häyry & Takala (2003a). pp. 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. (2004), “Complimentarity Rather than Integration”, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 81–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. and Häyry, M. (2005), “Overcritical, Overfriendly? A Dialogue Between a Sociologist and a Philosopher on Genetic Technology and Its Applications” Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 8, 377–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, J. (2004), “How Sociology Can Save Bioethics… Maybe”, Sociology of Health and Illness26 (7), 875–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays, N. and Pope, C. (2000), “Qualitative Research in Health Care: Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research”, BMJ 320, 50–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (2003), An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Cambridge [etc.]: Polity Press Mittelstrass, J. (2005), “Methodische Transdisciplinarität”, Technikfolgenabschätzung- Theorie und Praxis 2, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout A.M., Otten W., Dupuis H.M. and Kievit, J. (2003), “Implicit Normativity in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics Research”, Health Care Analysis 11 (1), 62–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molewijk, B. (2004a), “Integrated Empirical Ethics: In Search for Clarifying Identities”, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 85–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout A.M., Otten W., Dupuis H.M. and Kievit, J. (2004b), “Empirical Data and Moral Theory. A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics”,Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (1980), “The Case for Qualitative Research”, The Academy of Management Review 5, 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musschenga, A.W. (1999), “Empirical Science and Ethical Theory: The Case of Informed Consent”, in: Musschenga, A.W. & Steen, W.J. van der (eds.) (1999), Reasoning in ethics and law. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, R.A., Miles S.H. and Arnold, R.M. (1993), “Contributions of Empirical Research to Medical Ethics”, Theoretical Medicine 14, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/ Value Dichotomy. Cambridge MA [etc.]: Harvard UP. Ritchie, B.F. & Kaplan, A. (1940), “A Framework for an Empirical Ethics”, Philosophy of Science 7 (4), 476–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, L. van der and Widdershoven, G. (2004), “Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity?”,Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, 71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorupinski, B. and Ott, K. (2002), “Technology assessment and ethics”, Poiesis & Praxis 1, 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der (1995), Facts, value and methodology. Amsterdam [etc.]: Rodopi. Solbakk, J.H. (2004), “Use and Abuse of Empirical Knowledge in Contemporary Bioethics”,Medicine Health Care and Philosophy7, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J. and Sulmasy, D.P. (2001), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington DC: Georgetown UP. Twine, R. (2005), “Constructing Critical Bioethics by Deconstructing Culture/Nature Dualism”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8, 285–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, D. (1989), Practical Reflection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorstenbosch, J. (1993), “Four Ways of Leaving the Ivory Tower; Perspectives on Research in Applied Ethics”, in: Heeger & Van Willigenburg (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorstenbosch, J. (1999), “Open Deuren en Dichte Luiken”, K&M: Tijdschrift Voor Empirische Ethiek 23, 178–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, G. (ed.) (1990), Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht [etc.]: Kluwer. Welie, J.V.M. (1998), “Clinical ethics: Theory or Practice”, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19, 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zussman, R. (1997), “Sociological Perspectives on Medical Ethics and Decision-Making”, Annual Review of Sociology 23, 171–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zussman, R. (2000), “The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics”, Hastings Center Report 30 (1), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Niels Nijsingh & Marcus Düwell

Authors
  1. Niels Nijsingh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcus Düwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University Ethics Institute, Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands

    Paul Sollie  & Marcus Düwell  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nijsingh, N., Düwell, M. (2009). Interdisciplinarity, Applied Ethics and Social Science. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation