Abstract
This chapter explores the ethics of technology in a double sense: it lays bare points of application for ethical reflection about technology development, and it analyzes the ethical dimensions of technology itself. First, the chapter addresses the question of how to conceptualize and assess the moral significance of technological artifacts. If technologies help to shape moral actions and decisions, how to understand and evaluate this moral role of material artifacts? Second, the chapter analyzes the implications of the moral significance of technology for the question of responsibility. If moral actions and decisions are the result of complex interactions between humans and technologies, how to attribute responsibility in such situations? And third, the chapter analyzes how designers can take responsibility for the moral dimensions of their designs. By integrating the methods of stakeholder analysis and mediation analysis, the chapter proposes an expanded framework for the ethics of design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achterhuis, H. (1995), ‘De moralisering van de apparaten’. In: Socialisme en Democratie 52 nr. 1, 3–12.
Achterhuis, H. (1998), De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam: Ambo.
Akrich, M. (1992), ‘The de-scription of technical objects’. In: W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society. Cambridge: MIT Press, 205–224.
Berdichewsky, D. and E. Neuenschwander (1999), ‘Toward an ethics of persuasive technology’. Communications of the ACM 42: 5, pp. 51–58.
Boenink, M. (2007). ‘Genetic diagnostics for hereditary breast cancer. Displacement of uncertainty and responsibility.’ In: G. de Vries and K. Horstman (eds.), Genetics form the Laboratory to Society. Palgrave/Macmillan.
Heidegger, M. (1977), ‘The question concerning technology’. In: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans. W. Lovitt). New York: Harper & Row.
Ihde, D. (1990), Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press (The Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology).
Ihde, D. (1993),Postphenomenology. Evanston, Il.: Northwestern University Press.
Introna, L. (2005), Disclosive ethics and information technology: disclosing facial recognition systems. Ethics and Information Technology 7: 75–86.
Jaspers, K. (1951), Man in the Modern Age (trans. E. Paul and C. Paul). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Knight, W. (2005), ‘Mirror that reflects your future self’. New Scientist, issue 2485, 05 February 2005, p. 23.
Latour, B. (1992), ‘Where are the missing masses? – The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In: W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1993), We have never been modern (trans. C. Porter). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (translation of: Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Parijs: La Découverte, 1991).
Rip, A., T. Misa and J. Schot (eds.) (1995), Managing Technology in Society – the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter.
Schot, J. (1992), Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values 17-1: 36–56.
Smith, A. (2003), ‘Do You Believe in Ethics? Latour and Ihde in the Trenches of the Sciences Wars’. In: D. Ihde and E. Selinger (eds.), Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Steg, L. (1999). Verspilde energie? Wat doen en laten Nederlanders voor het milieu. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP Cahier no. 156).
Verbeek, P.P. (2005). What Things Do – Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
Weegink, R.J. (1996). Basisonderzoek elektriciteitsverbruik kleinverbruikers BEK’95. Arnhem: EnergieNed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verbeek, PP. (2009). The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifacts. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2228-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2229-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)