Skip to main content

Ethics of Technology at the Frontier of Uncertainty: A Gewirthian Perspective

  • Chapter
Evaluating New Technologies

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 3))

  • 1317 Accesses

Abstract

Complexity and uncertainty are central to technological innovations. Many emerging complex technologies are developed under conditions of uncertainty. This brings to the fore the question of how we should deal with risky and uncertain technology developments that are potentially detrimental and harmful to human beings and the environment. It is argued that uncertainty gives rise to three fundamental questions with regard to ethical theory, namely its justification, its practicability, and, as a sub-question, how it deals with complex, uncertain cases that thwart practical moral reasoning due to a resultant lack of knowledge. Any ethics of technology should be able to formulate answers to these questions if it is to be regarded as adequate. This article purports to provide an answer to these questions by investigating Gewirth’s supreme moral principle—the Principle of Generic Consistency (PGC)—that requires every agent to act in accordance with its own and its recipients’ generic rights to freedom and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beyleveld, D. The Dialectical Necessity of Morality. An Analysis and Defense of Alen Gewirth’s Argument for the Principle of Generic Consistency. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. “Principle, Proceduralism, and Precaution in a Community of Rights.” Ratio Juris 2006, 19, 2, 141–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, D. The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. Reason and Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. “The Basis and Content of Human Rights” Georgia Law Review 1979, 13, 4, 1143–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. “The Justificatory Argument for Human Rights” Social Philosophy & Policy 1984, 1, 2, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. “Participation as a Means of Enhancing the Legitimacy of Decisions on Technology? A Sceptical Analysis.” Poiesis & Praxis 2004, 3, 1, 106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moor, J. “Just Consequentialism and Computing.” Ethics and Information Technology 1999, 1, 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontzen, H. “Discourse Ethics in TA Procedures: A Game Theory Model.” Poiesis & Praxis 2006, 4, 3, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regis, E. Jr. (Ed.). Gewirth’s Ethical Rationalism: Critical Essays with a Reply by Alan Gewirth. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorupinski, B, and Ott, K. “Technology Assessment and Ethics.” Poiesis and Praxis 2002, 1, 2, 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollie, P. “Ethics, Technology Development and Uncertainty: an outline for any future ethics of technology.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2007, 5, 4, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, E.H. Ethics Within Reason. A Neo-Gewirthian Approach. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder, K. Grundlegung der normatieve Ethik. Der Ansatz von Alan Gewirth. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W.E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., Sluis, J.P. van der, Asselt, M.B.A. van, Janssen, P. and Krayer Von Kraus, M.P. “Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-based Decision Support.”Integrated Assessment 2003, 4, 1, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sollie, P. (2009). Ethics of Technology at the Frontier of Uncertainty: A Gewirthian Perspective. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics