Abstract
The article aims to examine uncertainty in technology development and its subsequent ramifications for ethical technology assessment. Although uncertainty is a pivotal feature of complex technologies, its importance has not yet been fully appreciated within the field of ethics. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to study uncertainty in technology development and its consequences for ethics. Going on the insight of other scientific disciplines such as environmental studies or economics the concept of uncertainty is disentangled and a typology of uncertainty is proposed and introduced to ethical theory. The uncertainty typology results in a series of questions with regard to the collection of information about the object of assessment (i.e. complex technologies and their development) and the framework of assessment (i.e. ethical theory and its practical aim of guiding the assessment of technology development). What is more, the uncertainty surrounding technology development has ramifications for ethical technology assessment. Any attempt to provide an account of ethics of technology may seem daunting given the fact of uncertainty, because uncertainty results in a lack of information to guide our moral decision-making. In order to deal legitimately with uncertainty, I claim that any adequate ethics of technology needs to account for both substance and procedure. The paper concludes with requirements for any future ethics of technology under uncertainty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BECK, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BEYLEVELD, D. 1991. The Dialectical Necessity of Morality: An Analysis and Defense of Alan Gewirth’s Argument to the Principle of Generic Consistency. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.
BEYLEVELD, D. and BROWNSWORD, R. 2007. Consent In The Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
BREY, P. 2001. Disclosive Computer Ethics. In: R.A. SPINELLO and H.T. TAVANI, (eds). Readings in Cyberethics, Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc. pp.51–62.
BROWN, N., RAPPERT, B., and WEBSTER, A. 2000. Introducing Contested Futures: From Looking into the Future to Looking at the Future. In:N. BROWN, B. RAPPERT, and A. WEBSTER, (eds). Contested Futures. A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. pp.3–20.
CILLIERS, P. 2005. Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism. In: Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), pp.255–267.
CLARKE, S. 2005. Future Technologies, Dystopic Futures and the Precautionary Principle. In: Ethics and Information Technology, 7, pp.121–126.
COLLINGRIDGE, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
GEWIRTH, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
GEWIRTH, A. 1984. Replies to My Critics. In: REGIS, E. Jr. (ed.). Gewirth’s Ethical Rationalism: Critical Essays with a Reply by Alan Gewirth. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp.192–255.
HEALY, T. 2006. The Unanticipated Consequences of Technology [online]. [Accessed 18th October 2006]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/healy/consequences.html>
JOHNSON, D.G. 1997. Ethics Online. Communications of the ACM, 40(1), pp.60–64.
KNIGHT, F.H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. London: The Riverside Press.
MEIJER, I.S.M., HEKKERT, M.P., FABER, J., and SMITS, R.E.H.M. 2005. Perceived Uncertainties Regarding Socio-Technological Transformation: Towards a Typology. In: Proceedings DRUID (Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics) Winter Conference on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Skørping, Denmark.
MOOR, J.H. 1985. What is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16(4), pp.266–275.
OSBORN, D. 2002. Stretching the Frontiers of Precaution. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, pp.37–41.
PARFIT, D. 2006. Climbing the Mountain. (accessed through the Internet: http://individual.utoronto.ca/stafforini/parfit/parfit_-_climbing_the_mountain.pdf, last accessed: 1 October, 2008).
RIP, A. 2006. The Tension between Fiction and Precaution in Nanotechnology. In: E. FISHER, J. JONES and R. VON SCHOMBERG, (eds). Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar. pp.270–283.
SOLLIE, P. 2005. Technology and the Control Dilemma. Exploring an Ethics of Technology. In: P. BREY, F. GRODZINSKY, and L. INTRONA, (eds). Ethics of New Information Technology. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry, 17–19 July 2005, Enschede. Enschede: CTIT. pp.331–343.
SOLLIE, P. 2008. Don’t blame it on the principles! Uncertainty and uniqueness in ethical technology assessment. In: T.W. BYNUM, M. CALZAROSSA, I. DE LOTTO and S. ROGERSON, (eds). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference. Living, Working and Learning beyond Technology, Ethicomp 2008. Mantua: Tipografia Commerciale: pp.430–439.
SOLLIE, P. (forthcoming 2009). The Uncertainty of Ethics and the Ethics of Uncertainty. (PhD-thesis). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
TENNER, E. 1996. Why Things Bite Back. Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Random House.
TIMMONS, M. 2002. Moral Theory: An Introduction. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
VERBEEK, P.-P. and SLOB, A. 2006. Technology and User Behavior. An Introduction. In:P.-P.VERBEEK and A. SLOB, (eds). User Behavior and Technology Development. Shaping Sustainable Relations Between Consumers and Technologies. Dordrecht: Springer. pp.3–12.
VON SCHOMBERG, R. 2007. From The Ethics of Technology Towards an Ethics of Knowledge Policy & Knowledge Assessment. A working document of the services of the European Commission. Research Directorate General of the European Commission, Brussels.
WALKER, W.E., HARREMOËS, P., ROTMANS, J., SLUIS, J.P. van der, ASSELT, M.B.A. van, JANSSEN, P. and KRAYER VON KRAUS, M.P. 2003. Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-based Decision Support. In: Integrated Assessment, 4(1), pp.5–17.
WECKERT, J. and MOOR, J. 2006. The Precautionary Principle in Nanotechnology. In: International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(2), pp.191–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sollie, P. (2009). On Uncertainty in Ethics and Technology. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2228-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2229-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)