Skip to main content

De rol van hulpverleners in het palliatieve zorgonderzoek

Niet te veel beschermen?

  • Chapter
  • 939 Accesses

Samenvatting

Een arts, verbonden aan een hospice, hoort van Amerikaanse collega’s enthousiaste verhalen over een crème tegen misselijkheid: het werkt geweldig en is minder belastend voor patiënten dan reguliere middelen tegen misselijkheid.

Wetenschappelijk onderzoek met kwetsbare proefpersonen gatekeeping behoefte aan evidence-based kennis van palliatie

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. De casus is fictief, maar losjes gebaseerd op: Buss MK, Arnold RM. Challenges in palliative care research: one experience. J Palliative Med. 2004;7:405-406.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kendall M, Harris F, Boyd K, et al. Key challenges and ways forward in researching the ‘good death’: qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study. Br Med J. 2007;334:521.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tan H, Wilson A, Olver I, Barton C. Recruiting palliative patients for a large qualitative study: some ethical considerations and staff dilemmas. Explore (ny). 2010;6:159-165.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharkey K, Savulescu J, Aranda S, Schofield P. Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010;36:363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Artikel 19, Verklaring van Helsinki, Fortaleza 2013. Online beschikbaar via: www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3.

  6. Hurst SA. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics. 2008;22:191-202.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schroeder D, Gefenas E. Vulnerability: too vague and too broad? Camb Q Healthc Ethic. 2009;18:113-121.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levine C, Faden R, Grady C, Hammerschmidt D, et al. The limitations of ‘vulnerability’ as a protection for human research participants. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:44-49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luna F, Vanderpoel S. Not the usual suspects: addressing layers of vulnerability. Bioethics. 2013;27:325-332.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7e druk. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Thiel, G., Kars, M. (2018). De rol van hulpverleners in het palliatieve zorgonderzoek. In: van Zuylen, L., van der Heide, A., van de Vathorst, S., Geijteman, E. (eds) De dokter en de dood. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2060-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2060-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2059-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-2060-8

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics