Skip to main content

Test versus model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2428 Accesses

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk wordt, aan de hand van een casus, het verschil uitgelegd tussen wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar individuele tests (klassiek testonderzoek) en het ontwikkelen van klinische predictiemodellen. Er zijn verschillende soorten predictiemodellen, afhankelijk van de uitkomst van zo’n model (diagnose, prognose of behandelkeuze). Tevens wordt aandacht besteed aan de interpretatie van gegevens die veelal in een wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar diagnostiek, en zeker de predictiemodellen worden gepresenteerd.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Referenties

  • Hosmer DW & Lemeshow S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moons KGM, Biesheuvel CJ & Grobbee DE. (2004) Test research versus diagnostic research. Clin Chem 2004;50:473–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moons KGM & Harrell FE. (2003) Sensitivity and specificity should be deemphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies. Acad Radiol 2003;10:670–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mower WR. (1999) Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL & Haynes RB. (2002) The architecture of diagnostic research, BMJ 2002;324:539–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, Lewis M, De Vet HC & Koes BW. (2010) Prognosis of patients with nonspecific neck pain; development and external validation of a prediction rule for persistent complaints. Spine 2010;35:E827e35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton TR, Hancock MJ, Maher CG & Koes BW. (2010) Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions. Phys Ther. 2010 Jun;90(6);843–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oort L, van den Berg T, Koes BW, De Vet RH, Anema HJ, Heymans MW & Verhagen AP. (2012) Preliminary state of development of prediction models for primary care physical therapy: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1257–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagemakers HP, Heintjes EM, Boks SS, Berger MY, Verhaar JA, Koes BW, et al. (2008) Diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination for assessing meniscal tears of the knee in general practice. Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Jan;18(1):24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walton DM, Carroll LJ, Kasch H, Sterling M, Verhagen AP, MacDermid JC, Gross A, Santaguida PL & Carlesso L; ICON. (2013) An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain: Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project. Open Orthop J. 2013 Sep 20;7:494–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verhagen, A., Alessie, J. (2014). Test versus model. In: Evidence based diagnostiek van het bewegingsapparaat. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0821-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0821-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0760-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-0821-7

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics