Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementatie van richtlijnen voor lage rugpijn in de eerstelijnsgezondheidszorg

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn

  • 1449 Accesses

Inleiding

Er is een enorme hoeveelheid wetenschappelijk onderzoek verricht naar aspecifieke lage rugpijn in de eerstelijnsgezondheidszorg. Vooral in de afgelopen twee decennia zijn honderden gerandomiseerde effectonderzoeken uitgevoerd en gepubliceerd. Deze zijn inmiddels op systematische wijze samengevat in literatuuronderzoek zoals gepresenteerd in hoofdstuk 4 en 5 van dit boek. Onderzoeksresultaten worden doorgaans gepubliceerd in wetenschappelijke tijdschriften, maar dit biedt geen garantie dat deze resultaten daadwerkelijk de doelgroep bereiken (disseminatie ), noch dat ze in de dagelijkse praktijk worden gebruikt (implementatie ).1–3 Een bijkomend probleem in Nederland en België is dat wetenschappelijk onderzoekers gemotiveerd worden de resultaten van hun onderzoek te publiceren in internationale, veelal Engelstalige, wetenschappelijke biomedische tijdschriften. Het aantal publicaties en de zogeheten impact factor van het tijdschrift waarin de artikelen worden gepubliceerd, zijn beoordelingscriteria voor wetenschappelijk onderzoekers. Implementatie van onderzoeksresultaten wordt meestal niet actief beoefend. Er blijft dus een kloof bestaan tussen wetenschap en praktijk. Richtlijnen zijn bij uitstek het middel om deze kloof te overbruggen. In hoofdstuk 6 is beschreven hoe de resultaten van wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar aspecifieke lage rugpijn zijn gebruikt bij de ontwikkeling van nationale en internationale richtlijnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Grol R, Jones R. Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract 2000;17:S32-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wensing M, Weijden T van der, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:991–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318:527–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Maclennan G, Bonetti D, Glidewell L, Pitts NB, Steen N, Thomas R, Walker A, Johnston M. Explaining clinical behaviors using multiple theoretical models. Implement Sci. 2012;7:99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabana M, Rand C, Power N, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 1999;282:1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schers H, Braspenning J, Drijver R. Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:640–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, Burgers JS. Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implement Sci. 2009;4:54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Besters CF, Han D, Westert GP. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grol R, Wensing M, redacteuren. Implementatie: effectieve verbetering van de patiëntenzorg. Maarssen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grol RTPM, Everdingen JJE van, Casparie AP. Invoering van richtlijnen en veranderingen. Een handleiding voor de medische, paramedische en verpleegkundige praktijk. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom;1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, Gracia J, James M, Marshall C, Sakala C, Sanger S, Strid J, Thomas V, van der Weijden T, Grol R, Burgers J; G-I-N PUBLIC. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:38.

    Google Scholar 

  15. van der Wees PJ, Jamtvedt G, Rebbeck T, de Bie RA, Dekker J, Hendriks EJ. Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2008;54(4):233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brusamento S, Legido-Quigley H, Panteli D, Turk E, Knai C, Saliba V, Car J, McKee M, Busse R. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to implement clinical guidelines for the management of chronic diseases at primary care level in EU Member States: a systematic review. Health Policy 2012;107(2-3):168–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability three part evaluation. BMJ 2001a;322(7301):1516–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001b;26(23):2535–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McGuirk B, King W, Govind J, Lowry J, Bogduk N. Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine 2001;26:2615–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rossignol M, Abenhaim L, Seguin P, et al. Coordination of primary health care for back pain. A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2000;25:251–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bishop PB, Wing PC. Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial. Spine J 2006;6(3):282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Becker A, Leonhardt C, Kochen MM, Keller S, Wegscheider K, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Chenot JF. Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2008;33(5):473–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N, Strauch K. Implementation of a guideline for low back pain management in primary care: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Spine 2012;37(8):701–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dey P, Simpson CWR, Collins SI, Hodgson G, Dowrick CF, Simison AJM, et al. Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2004;54:33–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Evans DW, Breen AC, Pincus T, Sim J, Underwood M, Vogel S, Foster NE. The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) randomized trial. Spine 2010;35(8):858–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, et al. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Carter JT, Birrell LN, eds. Occupational Health Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain at Work—Principal Recommendations. London, UK: Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waddell G, O’Connor M, Boorman S, Torsney B. Working Backs Scotland: a public and professional health education campaign for back pain. Spine 2007;32(19):2139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chavannes AW, Mens JMA, Koes BW, Lubbers WJ, Ostelo R, Spinnewijn WEM, Kolnaar BGM. NHG-Standaard Aspecifieke lagerugpijn (Eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet 2005;48(3):113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJM, Koes BW, Oostendorp RAB, Ostelo RWJG, Thomassen J, van Tulder MW. KNGF-richtlijn Lage Rugpijn. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother 2005;115 (Suppl. 1):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Engers AJ, Wensing M, van Tulder MW, Timmermans A, Oostendorp RA, Koes BW, Grol R. Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2005;30(6):559–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, Hendriks EJ, Koopmanschap MA, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Oostendorp RA. Implementation of clinical guidelines on physical therapy for patients with low back pain: randomized trial comparing patient outcomes after a standard and active implementation strategy. Phys Ther 2005;85(6):544–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoeijenbos M, Bekkering T, Lamers L, Hendriks E, van Tulder M, Koopmanschap M. Cost-effectiveness of an active implementation strategy for the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for low back pain. Health Policy 2005;75(1):85–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Brennan GP. Does adherence to the guideline recommendation for active treatments improve the quality of care for patients with acute low back pain delivered by physical therapists? Med Care 2007;45(10):973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rutten GM, Degen S, Hendriks EJ, Braspenning JC, Harting J, Oostendorp RA. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for low back pain in physical therapy: do patients benefit? Phys Ther 2010;90(8):1111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heijmans M, Hendriks HJM, Koes BW, Oostendorp RAB, Tulder MW van. KNGF-richtlijn Manuele therapie bij Lage Rugpijn. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother 2003;113 (Suppl. 3):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Verbeek JHAM, Anema JR, Everaert CPJ, Foppen GM, Heymans M, Hlobil H, Maijer JMA, Melis MTM, Meulenbeld C, Nieuwland E, Oberndorff A. Handelen van de bedrijfsarts bij werknemers met rugklachten. Richtlijnen voor bedrijfsartsen. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arbeids- en Bedrijfsgeneeskunde (NVAB) 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Koes BW, Sanders RJ e.a. Richtlijn aspecifieke lage rugklachten. Utrecht: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tulder MW van, Custers JWH, Bie RA de, Hammelburg R, Hulshof CTJ, Kolnaar BGM, Kuijpers T, Ostelo RWJG, van Royen BJ, Sluiter A. Ketenzorg richtlijn aspecifieke lage rugklachten. ZONMW KKCZ 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Breen AC, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Jensen I, Reardon R, Bronfort G. Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care? Eur Spine J 2006;15(5):641–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, et al. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care 1995;4:55–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer trial. Ann Intern Med 1984;100:130–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Emslie CJ, Grimshaw J, Templeton A. Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples? BMJ 1993;306:1728–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Ensuring that guidelines change clinical practice. In: The development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Report of the Clinical Guidelines Working Group. Exeter: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1995. p. 12–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Grol R, Zwaard A, Mokkink H, Dalhuijsen J, Casparie A. Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:135–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Watkins C, Harvey I, Langley C, et al. General practitioners’ use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:11–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Freemantle N. Implementation strategies. Fam Pract 2000;17:S7–S11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller WL, Crabtree BF, McDaniel R, Strange KC. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract 1998;46:369–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hobbs FD, Erhardt L. Acceptance of guideline recommendations and perceived implementation of coronary heart disease prevention among primary care physicians in five European countries: the Reassessing European Attitudes about Cardiovascular Treatment (REACT) survey. Fam Pract 2002;19:596–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Pooles F. Guidelines in general practice: the new tower of Babel? BMJ 1998;317:862–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Côté AM, Durand MJ, Tousignant M, Poitras S. Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):94–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chenot JF, Scherer M, Becker A, Donner-Banzhoff N, Baum E, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM. Acceptance and perceived barriers of implementing a guideline for managing low back in general practice. Implement Sci 2008;3:7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Evans DW, Foster NE, Vogel S, et al. Implementing evidence-based practice in the UK physical therapy professions: do they want it and do they feel they need it? Proceedings of the 5th International Forum on Low Back Pain Research in Primary Care; 2003 May; Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Verhulststraat 78 2, 1071 NJ, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    M.W. van Tulder

Authors
  1. M.W. van Tulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2013 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Tulder, M. (2013). Implementatie van richtlijnen voor lage rugpijn in de eerstelijnsgezondheidszorg. In: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0276-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-0277-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation