Skip to main content

Epidemiologie van lage rugpijn

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn
  • 1699 Accesses

Inleiding

Lage rugpijn is een belangrijk gezondheidsprobleem. De aandoening komt vaak voor en leidt tot hoge kosten als gevolg van medische zorg, werkverzuim en arbeidsongeschiktheid. Een recente publicatie van de ‘Global Burden of Disease Study’ liet zien dat van 289 ziekten en aandoeningen die waren onderzocht, lage rugpijn leidt tot de meeste levensjaren met beperkingen (‘years lived with disability’).1 Lage rugpijn heeft niet alleen grote gevolgen voor de patiënt, maar ook voor zijn familie, de gezondheidszorg, zijn werkgever en de maatschappij in het algemeen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M e.a. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380(9859):2163–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouter LM, Zielhuis GA, Dongen MCJM van. Epidemiologisch onderzoek: opzet en interpretatie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; zesde, herziene druk, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spitzer WO, Leblanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987;12(7 Suppl):S1–S59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. Classification of chronic pain. 3rd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nederlandse vertaling van de WHO-publicatie: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, Geneva 2001. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten/Diegem, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA 1992; 268:760–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, York J, Das A, McAuley JH. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60(10):3072–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mens JMA, Chavannes AW, Koes BW, Lubbers WJ, Ostelo RWJG, Spinnewijn WEM, Kolnaar BGM. NHG-Standaard Lumbosacraal radiculair syndroom (LRS) (eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet 2005; 48(4):171–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69:1044–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waddell G. A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain. Spine 1987; 12:632–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulder MW van, Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of observational studies. Spine 1997; 22:427–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chavannes AW, Mens JMA, Koes BW, Lubbers WJ, Ostelo R, Spinnewijn WEM, Kolnaar BGM. Huisarts Wet 2005; 48(3):113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23:2003–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1:277–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Köke AJA, Heuts PHTG, Vlaeyen JWS, Weber WEJ. Meetinstrumenten chronische pijn: deel 1 functionele status. Maastricht: Pijnkenniscentrum; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kopec J, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine 1995; 20:341–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbanks JCT, Davies JB, Couper J, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66:271–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. König-Zahn C, Furer JW, Tax B. Het meten van de gezondheidstoestand: algemene gezondheid. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19:787–805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981;15A:221–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J, Keller A, Clark D, Dietrich A, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Cron Dis 1987;40 (Suppl 1):55S–63S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brooks R. Euroqol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37:53–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hakkaart- van Roijen L, Essink-Bot ML. Handleiding Vragenlijst over Ziekte en Werk. Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kessler RC, Barber C, Beck A, Berglund P, Cleary PD, McKenas D, et al. The World Health Organization health and work performance questionnaire. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45:156–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 1990; 3:35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52:157–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Leboeuf-Yde C. Body weight and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies. Spine 2000; 25:226–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Leboeuf-Yde C. Alcohol and low-back pain: a systematic literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000; 23:343–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoogendoorn WE, Poppel MNM van, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25:387–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between smoking and low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2010;123(1):87.e7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoogendoorn WE, Poppel MNM van, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systemic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 2000; 25:2114–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Power C, Frank J, Hertzman C, Schierhout G, Li L. Predictors of low back pain onset in a prospective British study. Am J Public Health 2001; 91:1671–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 2000; 25:1148–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wynne-Jones G, Dunn KM, Main CJ. The impact of low back pain on work: a study in primary care consulters. Eur J Pain 2008; 12(2):180–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, York J, Das A, McAuley JH. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a171.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Heitz CA, Hilfiker R, Bachmann LM, Joronen H, Lorenz T, Uebelhart D, Klipstein A, Brunner F. Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(12):1829–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bongers PM, Winter CR de, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease; a review of the literature. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19:297–312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Linton SJ. Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11:53–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S, Dunn KM. The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012 Aug 9. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA 2010; 303(13):1295–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kendall N, Linton S, Main C. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington: National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability/Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 1998; 14:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:291–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Grotle M, Brox JI, Veierød MB, Glomsrød B, Lønn JH, Vøllestad NK. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time. Spine 2005; 30(8):976–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, Henschke N. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b3829.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lemeunier N, Leboeuf-Yde C, Gagey O. The natural course of low back pain: a systematic critical literature review. Chiropr Man Therap 2012 Oct 17;20(1):33. [epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  51. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Risk factors and the natural course of acute and recurrent musculoskeletal pain: developing a screening instrument. In: Jensen TS, Turner JA, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, editors. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain. Vol. 8. Seattle: IASP Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Linton SJ. The socio-economic impact of chronic back pain: is anyone benefiting? Pain 1998; 75:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Andersson GBJ. Epidemiology of low back pain. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1998; 281:28–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR. Characterizing the course of low back pain: a latent class analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(8):754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Haanen HCM. Een epidemiologisch onderzoek naar lage-rugpijn [proefschrift]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Miedema HS, Chorus AMJ, Wevers CWJ, Linden S van der. Chronicity of back problems during working life. Spine 1998; 23:2021–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Velden J van den, Bakker DH de, Claessens AAMC, Schellevis FG. Een nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Basisrapport: morbiditeit in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht: NIVEL; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lamberts H. In het huis van de huisarts. Verslag van het Transitieprojekt. Lelystad: Meditekst; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Picavet HSJ, Schouten JSAG, Smit HA. Prevalenties en consequenties van lage rugpijn in het MORGEN-project 1993-1995. Rapport nr 263200004. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  60. van Oostrom SH, Monique Verschuren WM, de Vet HC, Picavet HS. Ten year course of low back pain in an adult population-based cohort—the Doetinchem cohort study. Eur J Pain 2011; 15(9):993–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Valkenburg HA, Haanen HCM. The epidemiology of low back pain. In: White AA, Gordon SL, editors. Symposium on idiopathic low back pain. St. Louis: Mosby; 1092 p. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(6):2028–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, Wyatt M, Cassidy JD, Rossignol M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hartvigsen J, Leino-Arjas P, Latza U, Reis S, Gil Del Real MT, Kovacs FM, Oberg B, Cedraschi C, Bouter LM, Koes BW, Picavet HS, van Tulder MW, Burton K, Foster NE, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Underwood M, Waddell G, Shekelle P, Volinn E, Von Korff M. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 2008; 33(1):95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Meerding WJ, Bonneux L, Polder JJ, Koopmanschap MA, Maas PJ van der. Demographic and epidemiological determinants of health care costs in the Netherlands: cost of illness study. BMJ 1998; 317:111–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lambeek LC, van Tulder MW, Swinkels IC, Koppes LL, Anema JR, van Mechelen W. The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007. Spine 2011; 36(13):1050–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008; 8(1):8–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. The economics of spinal disorders. In: JW Frymoyer (Ed.). The adult spine: principles and practice. 1st ed. New York: Raven Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Watson PJ, Main CJ, Waddell G, Gales TF, Purcell-Jones G. Medically certified work loss, recurrence and costs of wage compensation for back pain: a follow-up study of the working population of Jersey. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Fordyce WE, editor. Back pain in the workplace: management of disability in nonspecific conditions. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Einerhand MGK, Knol G, Prins R, Veerman TJ. Sickness and invalidity arrangements. Facts and figures from six European countries. ’s-Gravenhage: VUGA: 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Scheele J, Luijsterburg PA, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Pereira L, Peul WC, van Tulder MW, Bohnen AM, Berger MY, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW. Back complaints in the elders (BACE); design of cohort studies in primary care: an international consortium. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 19;12:193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Tulder, M. (2013). Epidemiologie van lage rugpijn. In: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0276-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-0277-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics