Skip to main content
  • 495 Accesses

Samenvatting

Amalgaam wordt al sedert 1890 gebruikt. Miljoenen patiënten kregen amalgaamrestauraties voor de behandeling van cariës.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • AADR (American Association for Dental Research) & IADR (International Association for Dental Research) Comments to the FDA dental Products Panel (Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0268), 14 december 2010. Geraadpleegd via http://www.iadr.org/files/public/2010DentalAmalgamComments.pdf op 5 juni 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ADA (American Dental Association) Statement by the American Dental Association to the Government Reform Committee United States House of Representatives on ‘Mercury in Dental Amalgams: An Examination of the Science’. Geraadpleegd via http://www.iaomt.org/testfoundation/burtonamalgamada.htm op 5 juni 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, McKinlay S. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;295:1775-83.

  • Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:775-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Townes BD, Woods JS, Leitão J, Castro-Caldas A, Luis H, Bernardo M, Rosenbaum G, Martins IP. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;295:1784-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issa Y, Brunton PA, Glenny AM, Duxbury AJ. Healing of oral lichenoid lesions after replacing amalgam restorations: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:553-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovarik RE. Restoration of posterior teeth in clinical practice: evidence base for choosing amalgam versus composite. Dent Clin N Am 2009;53:71-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GM, Wilson R, Allard D, Purtill C, Douma S, Gravière J. Mercury exposure and risks from dental amalgam in the US population, post-2000. Sci Total Environ 2011;409:4257-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl MJ. Amalgam – Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Quintessence Int 2001 Jul-Aug;32(7):525-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl MJ. Amalgam –resurrection and redemption. Part 2: The medical mythology of anti-amalgam. Review. Quintessence Int 2001 Oct;32(9):696-710.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Moor, R. (2013). 3 Amalgaam. In: Aps, J., Brand, H., Duyck, J., van Es, R., Jacobs, R., Vissink, A. (eds) Het Tandheelkundig Jaar 2013. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9092-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9092-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-313-9091-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-313-9092-2

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics