Abstract
Locally recurrent cancer or, less commonly, a bulky, primary tumor arising adjacent to the urologic organs, requires an extended operation for salvage. During surgery for colorectal carcinoma (CRC), or pelvic surgery, a carcinomatous infiltration of adjacent urological organs is found in 5–10% of all cases [1]. However, this rate increases to ~50% in T4 and even higher rates for rectal carcinomas, as it is only partially covered by the visceral peritoneum, and to ~80% in recurrent carcinomas [2]. In these advanced cases in particular, an inherent surgical problem is the impossibility of distinguishing between inflammation and malignant infiltration of the adjacent organs during surgery [3]. Total pelvic exenteration (PE) and its modifications are surgical options for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. Total PE may involve en bloc removal of the rectum, bladder, prostate, or ureters, since it is essential to create clear margins if the procedure is to be curative. As a result, patients often require double stomas, which severely compromise quality of life (QoL) despite achieving acceptable locoregional control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stief CG, Jonas U, Raab R (2002) Long-term follow-up after surgery for advanced colorectal carcinoma involving the urogenital tract. Eur Urol 41:546–550
Harada K, Sakai I, Muramaki M et al (2006) Reconstruction of urinary tract combined with surgical management of locally advanced non-urological cancer involving the genitourinary organs. Urol Int 76:82–86
Levin KE, Dozois RR (1991) Epidemiology of large bowel cancer. World J Surg 15:562–567
Fujisawa M, Nakamura T, Ohno M et al (2002) Surgical management of the urinary tract in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. Urology 60:983–987
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC (eds) (2012) Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10th ed. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia
Rackley RR, Abdelmalak JB (2001) Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty. Surgical technique. Urol Clin North Am 28:663–670
Pantuck AJ, Han KR, Perrotti M et al (2000) Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion: long-term results and complications of direct versus nonrefluxing techniques. J Urol 163:450–455
Hautmann S, Chun KH, Currlin E et al (2006) Refluxing chimney versus nonrefluxing LeDuc ureteroileal anastomosis for orthotopic ileal neobladder: a comparative analysis for patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 175:1389–1393 (discussion 1393-–1394)
Bricker EM (1950) Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 3: 1511–1521
Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A et al (2007) A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer. 78(3 Pt 1):945–948 (discussion 948–949)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quarto, G., Muscariello, R., Sorrentino, D., PerdonĂ , S. (2016). Techniques of Urological Reconstruction. In: Romano, G.M. (eds) Multimodal Treatment of Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5767-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5767-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5766-1
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5767-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)