Skip to main content

Trauma of the Central Nervous System

  • Chapter
Prognosis of Neurological Diseases
  • 1389 Accesses

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alteration of brain function caused by external mechanical forces. With an estimated annual incidence of up to 500 cases per 100,000 in the USA and Europe, TBI is the leading cause of death and disability among young adults.

The most prominent sign after TBI is the impairment of consciousness, and TBI is traditionally classified according to the Glasgow Coma Scale score as: Mild 12< GCS, Moderate 9≤ GCS ≤12, Severe GCS <9.

Treatment protocols of TBI are devoted to limiting secondary brain injury.

Negative prognostic factors are older age, impairment of consciousness, low GCS score, bilaterally absent pupillary light reflex, arterial hypotension and hypoxia, occurrence of any TBI-related abnormality on neuroimaging, and intracranial hematomas. Mortality of severe TBI is 25 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilson JTL, Laura EL, Pettigrew LEL, et al. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maas AIR, Murray GD, Roozenbeek B, et al, for the International Mission on Prognosis Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Study Group. Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings fromthe IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research. Lancet Neurol. Published Online October 17, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70234-5.

  3. Weir J, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, et al. Does the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale add value to the conventional Glasgow Outcome Scale? J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:53–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens RD, Sutter R. Prognosis in severe brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1104–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. https://www.braintrauma.org/coma-guidelines/searchable-guidelines/. [last visited 04\08\2015]

  6. IMPACT: International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials. TBI. http://www.tbi-impact.org/. [last visited 04\08\2015]

  7. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e165 discussion e165.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. Br Med J. 2008;336:425–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Olivecrona M, Koskinen LO. The IMPACT prognosis calculator used in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with an ICP-targeted therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:1567–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olivecrona M, Olivecrona Z. Use of the CRASH study prognosis calculator in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with an intracranial pressure-targeted therapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;304:81–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gennarelli TA, Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ. Comparison of mortality, morbidity, and severity of 59,713 head injured patients with 114,447 patients with extracranial injuries. J Trauma. 1994;37:962–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:585–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McNarry AF, Goldhill DR. Simple bedside assessment of level of consciousness: comparison of two simple assessment scales with the Glasgow Coma Scale. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:34–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill M, Steele R, Windemuth R, et al. A comparison of five simplified scales to the prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:968–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Galanaud D, Perlbarg V, Gupta R, et al. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1300–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beretta L, Anzalone N, Dell’Acqua A, Calvi MR, Gemma M. Post-traumatic interpeduncular cistern hemorrhage as a marker for brainstem lesions. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:509–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calvi MR, Beretta L, Dell’Acqua A, Anzalone N, Licini G, Gemma M. Early prognosis after severe traumatic brain injury with minor or absent computed tomography scan lesions. J Trauma. 2011;70:447–51. Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1997;15:573–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2471–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nangunoori R, Maloney-Wilensky E, Stiefel M, et al. Brain tissue oxygen-based therapy and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic literature review. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al, for the DECRA Trial Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stiver SI, Wintermark M, Manley GT. Reversible monoparesis following decompressive hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:245–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz DI, Alexander MP. Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:661–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs B, Beems T, Stulemeijer M, et al. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:655–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McKee AC, Gavett BE, Stern RA, et al. TDP-43 proteinopathy and motor neuron disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:918–29.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saboe LA, Darrah JM, Pain KS, Guthrie J. Early predictors of functional independence 2 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Neurosurgery 2013; 72: March Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ploumis A, Yadlapalli N, Fehlings MG, et al. A systematic review of the evidence supporting a role for vasopressor support in acute SCI. Spinal Cord 2010;48:356–62.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zorner B, Blanckenhorn WU, Dietz V, Group E-SS, Curt A. Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:241–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. The ASIA website http://www.asia-spinalinjury.org. [last visited 04\08\2015]

  31. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bozzo A, Marcoux J, Radhakrishna M, Pelletier J, Goulet B. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:1401–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Previnaire JG, Soler JM, El Masri W, Denys P. Assessment of the sympathetic level of lesion in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guimaraes PE, Fridman C, Gregorio SP, et al. DNA polymorphisms as tools for spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:171–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Gemma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gemma, M., Calvi, M.R. (2015). Trauma of the Central Nervous System. In: Sghirlanzoni, A., Lauria, G., Chiapparini, L. (eds) Prognosis of Neurological Diseases. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5755-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5755-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5754-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5755-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics